« December 2008 | transCurrents Home | February 2009 »

January 31, 2009

Nagesh: Comedy King of Tamil Cinema

By D.B.S. Jeyaraj

"Naghaichchuvai Mannan" (King of Comedy) Nagesh passed away in Chennai today (Jan 31st 2009).While eating breakfast he got chest pain and was taken to hospital where he breathed his last. Nagesh was 75.

[Nagesh 1933-2009]

He was the undisputed king of comedians in Tamil cinema from the early sixties to mid-seventies of the previous century. After a "lull" the versatile actor re-entered Tamil cinema in a new "avatar" playing character and villain roles. Even during his stint as comedian, Nagesh acted in quite a few lead roles too. [Click here to read the article in full ~ in dbsjeyaraj.com]

Winning the hearts and minds of the Tamil people in the North

by Shanie

The war, in its current phase, is nearing its end. There was never any doubt that the security forces, with their superior manpower, superior arms and control over the skies and sea, would in the end prevail over the LTTE in conventional operations. But the question was as to the extent of lives that would be lost, totally or partially, in regaining the territory under the control of the insurgents.

Many in civil society, including religious leaders, had urged a softer approach with an occasional temporary truce. That was in the hope that such an approach would result in less trauma for those affected, both combatants and civilians caught-up in the crossfire and their families, and less loss of military, LTTE and civilian lives. The end result of this soft approach, even though it would have taken longer to achieve, would have been the same. But the defence establishment preferred a hard line approach, pushing for victory over the LTTE in the shortest possible time, irrespective of the increased trauma and casualties that such a strategy would have entailed.

The bulk of the LTTE’s fighting cadres are now holed up in and around Puthukudiyiruppu. But with them are also an estimated 230 to 250 thousand civilians. The Government has announced a ‘safety zone’ into which these civilians can move. It makes sense for these civilians to move into such a safety zone and there can be little doubt that the majority of them would prefer to do so. But the LTTE’s strategy, as expected, is to keep them as human shields. If all the civilians move out, their cadres would be sitting ducks to the fire power of the security forces. So the civilians are forced to remain in the cross-fire. But it is the duty of the Government to be mindful of the helplessness of these civilians. Subjecting them to artillery fire or preventing food from reaching them should not be employed as a strategy to force the civilians to flee at immense risk to their lives. It is within the capacity of the security forces, at least at this stage, to change strategy to ensure civilian safety. After all, they have the LTTE almost surrounded and there is no possibility at this stage of the LTTE regrouping and re-arming itself. Instead of working to political imperatives and election deadlines, it will be in the long-term interests of our country and our people if the security forces now show total commitment to the welfare and safety of the trapped Tamil civilians, a commitment that the LTTE has hardly ever shown. Such a commitment by the government will not be lost on the Tamil civilians.

The future for the people of the North – and the East, despite claims of its ‘liberation’ – is a matter of concern to the country. The LTTE has been a monolithic outfit, totally under the control and direction of one leader. History has shown that any non-democratic organization will quickly collapse in the absence of its authoritarian leader. That surely will be the fate of the LTTE if its leader is captured or killed. If however he is able to go (or has gone) underground and continue leading the LTTE, then the outfit will go back to what it was in its early years and operate as a guerrilla force. It is difficult to predict if they will be a more deadly as guerrilla outfit, rather than as conventional insurgents.

But even as a guerrilla outfit, the LTTE’s effectiveness would be nullified if the Government commits itself to winning the hearts and minds of the Tamil people in the North, a commitment which they have not shown during the past three years. Replacing the LTTE with another armed group is not the way to go about providing democracy to the people of the North. The Government should have by now learnt the lessons of that policy in the East, where the LTTE has now re-emerged and is now making its militant presence felt. The Government dismisses the Tamil National Alliance as a proxy of the LTTE and has not even invited the TNA to make a contribution to the deliberations of the All Party Conference or the APRC. The irrelevance of the APRC today is of course not due to the absence of the TNA, but allowing only the armed groups to represent the Tamils was a disastrous decision. The TNA remains the only democratically elected representative of the Tamil people and by ignoring them the government has shown that it prefers to do business with armed clones of the LTTE rather than with elected representatives. After all, the TNA received over 90% of the votes in the Jaffna District.

After the assassinations of the early leadership of the TNA (and the earlier TULF), over the last ten years the TNA has lost leaders with a broad vision like Neelan Tiruchelvam, Joseph Pararajasingham and Nadarajah Raviraj to the assassin’s bullet and Veerasingham Anandasangari to intra-party politics. Only R Sambandan remains. He may be surrounded by hawks and chauvinists, but he is a person respected by the Tamil people and the government would have done well to recognise him with respect as an elected leader of the Tamil people.

The fear of the Tamil and Muslim people in the North and East is of continuing to live under discrimination and authoritarianism, even after driving out the LTTE from controlling any part pf the country. The government has shown no inclination so far to implementing the provisions of the 13th Amendment in its entirety, leave alone bringing any new meaningful devolution proposals. Armed groups still go round abducting, killing, robbing and harassing people in the ‘cleared areas’ of the North and East. And there are credible reports of planned colonisation of Muslim and Tamil lands by Sinhala settlers, implemented by chauvinist and fascist groups who are part of the government. That was the same disastrous policy followed in the nineteen seventies and eighties that gave birth to the LTTE. President Rajapaksa will understand the truth of the well–known saying of George Santayana about the danger of repeating the mistakes of history. Those who cannot remember the past, wrote Santayana, are condemned to repeat it. That is, those who fail to learn from the mistakes of their predecessors, are destined to repeat the same mistakes.

To win over the local civilian population to the cause of peace and democracy, it is not enough to make pronouncements to that effect. In addition to the implementation of political devolution proposals in terms of the Constitution, there will be a need for a strong civilian administration. Such an administration should be manned by strong independent professionals. Even in a non post-war situation, politicians and military officers do not usually make good administrators. There have been exceptions no doubt. In the Uva, we have an ex-politician who is keeping the provincial politicians on their toes, irrespective of party politics. In the East, in an earlier era, we had an ex-military officer who provided an impartial administration. But in the current situation, we need independent Tamil or Muslim professionals who will be able to provide leadership to the people without having to be confined to their offices surrounded by security. We need professionals who will be above politics, above partisanship and who will be able to stand up both against political meddling as well as against armed groups of all types. Only such an administration can prevent militancy from raising its head once again and crucially win the hearts and minds of the civilians, who have undergone decades of harassment from various quarters.

A military presence will still be necessary but it will have to be a not-so-visible one. After years of fighting an ethnic insurgency, mindsets of the security forces will be difficult to change. A re-orientation programme will be necessary to effect a change. But there will be chauvinists and fascists who will not want that mindset to change. How the governments handles this will be crucial to the development of democracy and good governance in the region. It can be questioned how a government that has failed to build up democratic freedoms and adherence to the rule of law in the rest of the country can do in the new situation in the North.

The only hope is that political expediency will be less of a factor in the North. But we are doomed if the government succumbs to political expediency and installs an armed group there.

(This article is from the column NOTEBOOK OF A NOBODY published in The Island)

January 30, 2009

17 Killed and 39 Injured in Bombing of Church Premises at Suthanthirapuram

Despite denials by Sri Lankan government ministers and officials that innocent civilians are being killed and injured in the aerial bombardment and artillery shelling by the armed forces in the Wanni , there is mounting evidence to the contrary. In a horrible incident on January 28th the Church premises of the American Ceylon Mission at Suthanthirapuram was bombed. 17 persons were killed and 39 including Rev. Anandarajan were injured. We reproduce here a letter sent by Rev. S. Jeyanesan of the ACM.

Further to my mail about the Wanni deteriorating situation, I am sad to inform you that one of our Church of the American Ceylon Mission Minister, the Rev. S. I. Anantharajah, Parish Priest of Murukandy and the manager of the Murukandy Girls' Home and the Day Care Center was injured as a result of aerial bombardment yesterday 28-1-2009 at Suthanthirapuram Church premises.

Along with him, 39 people were injured, among them 3 of our Orphanage Children. We also heard 17 people were killed in our compound the same day.

A month ago Rev. Anantharaja moved from Murukandy with his family, children of the Murukandy Girls' Home and the parishners of his Church to our Kilinochchi Church compound. Then he and the other pastors, considering the worsening situation in Kilinochchi, decided to move further interior and went to Vivsamadu Church Premises.

A month ago Rev. Anantharaja moved from Murukandy with his family, children of the Murukandy Girls' Home and the parishners of his Church to our Kilinochchi Church compound. Then he and the other pastors, considering the worsening situation in Kilinochchi, decided to move further interior and went to Vivsamadu Church Premises.

When I visited Visvamadu in December 2008, there were about 3000 people in the premises. Later I heard that number increased to 7000, including all our CACM ministers, Anglican Priests, Methodist Pastors, Catholic Priests and the orphan children of Karunanilayam, Navajeevanam and Shalom Nagar.

I was informed a week ago by the Rev. P. N. Anukoolan, the Area Minister in Wanni, that it has become impossible and dangerous to stay at Visvamadu. I advised them to leave all their belongings and to move out to Suthanthirapuram, which was considered safe zone.

At that time the Government also announced Suthanthirapuran as a neutral zone. I wonder how an aerial bombardment could happen at a Government declared neutral zone. I do not know how many people were there when the incident took place.

Communications are completely cutoff.

We also receive reports that hundreds and hundreds of injured people are there without any medical care.

Even at this juncture I reiterate that an immediate cease fire and cessation of hostilities is absolutely essential and urgent. Please do pray for the situation and do whatever possible.

With peace and prayers,

Yours very sincerely,

Rev. Dr. S. Jeyanesan
January 29, 2009

From Sri Lanka to Darfur:Funeral Procession of Massacred Innocents

by Bernard Kouchner

'Modern" war disgusts us in the tragic consequences it has for civilians.

How could we not be horrified at the sight of bodies, atrociously maimed or burned; the bodies of women, men and children lying in the smoking ruins of their homes, in hospitals unable to cope that have become simply places to die, absent sufficient drugs and equipment?

Unfortunately, such atrocities are to be seen in many places around the world, usually with relative indifference - the paradoxical outcome of the way in which the media have made violence an everyday event.

Somalia, Congo, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, Darfur, Gaza: this depressing litany of conflicts with their multitude of innocent civilian victims swept away by the storms of war must not however leave us indifferent.

The international community - and in particular France and the European Union, for which human rights are a core value, the very foundation of their sense of identity - cannot stand silently by in the face of such a situation.

In a period of armed conflict there is in fact a body of rules and principles that all parties to the conflict must obey: international humanitarian law.

That body of law, which has been largely built up since World War II, derives mainly from the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols.

While the International Committee of the Red Cross is the statutory guardian of those standards, all states parties to the conventions must not only obey them but also ensure that they are obeyed by the parties in an armed conflict.

What that means is that the international community has a special responsibility in ensuring compliance with international humanitarian law.

Indeed, one of the essential principles of international humanitarian law is that a distinction must be made at all times and in all circumstances between combatants and non-combatants, along with its corollary: a distinction between military targets and civilian targets, the latter to be protected. There are few conflicts in which that principle is fully respected.

In northeastern Sri Lanka, 230,000 civilians have been caught up in the fighting. The Tamil Tigers are accused by all NGOs of refusing to allow civilians to flee the war zone.

During the Israeli offensive in Gaza, there were several strikes in areas apparently devoid of any identifiable military target, and in particular that of Dec. 27, which hit the Gaza Training College, and the series of bombardments on Jan. 6 aimed at schools run by UNRWA (the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees).

Hamas also is responsible for violations of international humanitarian law, in part by firing rockets which were not aimed at military targets, but clearly intended to terrorize civilians in southern Israel.

Moreover, both Israel and Hamas have used weapons that have indiscriminate effects, since aerial bombing and mortar fire were not used in such a manner as to spare civilians. Yet the prohibition of the use of weapons with indiscriminate effects is another key principle of international humanitarian law.

The tragedy to which we have been witness in recent weeks is unfortunately not an isolated instance. Far too many armed conflicts ravage other parts of the world, from Sri Lanka to Darfur, from Somalia to Iraq, each with its funeral procession of massacred innocents. In each case the parties commit grave breaches of international humanitarian law, and in some cases mass atrocities punishable by international criminal justice.

Access is impeded to humanitarian aid and aid workers, plunging civilians into total destitution and depriving them of the most basic medical treatment. Children, some less than 10 years old, are enlisted as soldiers as well as sex slaves.

In various conflicts, rape is increasingly being used in a systematic, planned and large-scale manner; in short, it is used as a genuine weapon of war, whether in the Kivus or in Sudan, with almost total impunity. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, a woman is raped every 30 minutes; 30,000 were raped in the Kivus in the first half of 2007.

In the face of situations in which civilians are deliberately targeted, the maintenance and the restoration of peace are constant challenges.

France is engaged in numerous peacekeeping operations under UN mandates. The purpose of several of them - first and foremost the European Union operation in eastern Chad and north-eastern Central African Republic - is to provide protection to innocent civilians.

Such protection must involve first and foremost a guarantee of adherence to the principles of international humanitarian law in armed conflict and the inclusion of the issues surrounding the protection of civilians in mandates for peacekeeping operations.

I am convinced that compliance with international humanitarian law must be made the subject of depoliticized discussions at the United Nations, since such compliance is the duty of all, irrespective of the legitimacy of the military action undertaken by a specific state or armed group.

That is why I have asked France's permanent representative to the United Nations in New York to mobilize our partners on this matter. An initial meeting will be held in the coming days with a view to organizing a debate in the weeks to come.

What is at stake here is the credibility of the United Nations, and of the Security Council in particular, as the guardian of international peace and security.

(Bernard Kouchner, a co-founder of Medicine Sans Frontiers (MSF) is the foreign minister of France.This article appeared in International Herald Tribune of Jan 28th 2009)

January 29, 2009

MIA says Tamil Civilian and Tamil Tiger are like a square and a circle

MIAPBS0129.jpgOscar and Grammy award nominated singer Maya "MIA" Arulpragasam interviewed by Tavis Smiley of PBS:

Tavis: M.I.A. is a talented singer-songwriter and hip-hop artist who has the rare honor of being nominated -- get this -- for an Oscar and a Grammy in the same year. She's featured on the soundtrack of one of the year's biggest films, "Slumdog Millionaire," and is up for record of the year for her song "Paper Planes." Here is some of the video for "Paper Planes.

Tavis: So we'll deal with the obvious first -- somebody's having a baby.

M.I.A.: It's M.I.A. and the baby here. (Laughter.)

Tavis: Somebody's having a -- the baby ain't M.I.A., I can see that.

M.I.A.: I know, it's very there.

Tavis: Yeah, there he is. The funny thing -- maybe funny's the wrong word; I found it interesting -- so you're nominated for a Grammy and I'm told the baby is due on Grammy night?

M.I.A.: Mm-hmm. So if I turn up --

Tavis: M.I.A. is a talented singer-songwriter and hip-hop artist who has the rare honor of being nominated -- get this -- for an Oscar and a Grammy in the same year. She's featured on the soundtrack of one of the year's biggest films, "Slumdog Millionaire," and is up for record of the year for her song "Paper Planes." Here is some of the video for "Paper Planes.

Tavis: So we'll deal with the obvious first -- somebody's having a baby.

M.I.A.: It's M.I.A. and the baby here. (Laughter.)

Tavis: Somebody's having a -- the baby ain't M.I.A., I can see that.

M.I.A.: I know, it's very there.

Tavis: Yeah, there he is. The funny thing -- maybe funny's the wrong word; I found it interesting -- so you're nominated for a Grammy and I'm told the baby is due on Grammy night?

M.I.A.: Mm-hmm. So if I turn up --

Tavis: How'd you work that out?

M.I.A.: -- I have to turn up in my hospital gown on a stretcher, (laughter) and they already have, like, a helicopter organized for my fast exit plan.

Tavis: So did you plan it this way, to have the baby on the Grammy day?

M.I.A.: No, not at all. I didn't even know I was going to get nominated, and then they nominated me for a Brit as well, in England, and it was just like everything happened in the same week. But yeah, it's just -- it's insane.

Tavis: I asked M.I.A. when she walked out, we were just talking off camera, and I said, "So where's home for you these days? Where do you live?" She says, "I live in New York." So I was asking her when she was headed back to New York. She said, "Oh, no, I can't fly now, I'm stuck in L.A." So we know where the baby's going to be born, because you're not getting on a plane to go back to New York for a few days.

M.I.A.: No, and the Grammys are here anyway, so it just worked out. Like, as soon as I came they were, like, "You can't fly," and then I found out that I was nominated. And that's kind of why they invited me to go on the show to do the Grammys and perform there. They say anything could trigger off labor, so.

Tavis: Not now -- not for the next nine minutes, please.

M.I.A.: I know, I know. But I think, like, singing with Jay-Z and Lil Wayne and Kanye and --

Tavis: Yeah, that could make anything happen.

M.I.A.: -- T.I. could, yeah.

Tavis: Yeah, that could make -- with them Negros, anything could happen.

M.I.A.: Exactly. (Laughter.)

Tavis: So just not for the next nine minutes. What do you make of all of this? This is, like, rare.

M.I.A.: This is a good luck baby for me, and all the events, the way it's been happening, the way I've been sort of seeing it, is that being the only Tamil in the Western media, I have a really great opportunity to sort of bring forward what's going on in Sri Lanka. Like my success, it just seems to parallel the situation in Sri Lanka -- the more successful I'm getting, the dire the situation in Sri Lanka's getting.

And there's a genocide going on, and it's kind of -- it's ironic that I am the only Tamil, and I've turned into the only voice for the Tamil people, the 20 percent minority in my country. And yeah, it's weird that I'm being given the opportunity.

Tavis: This platform.

M.I.A.: Yeah, a platform.

Tavis: Since you've been given the platform, take it for just a second. For those who may not be familiar with Sri Lanka and the Tamil people, tell me the top line of who the Tamil people are, what's happening in Sri Lanka, now that you have this platform to talk about it.

M.I.A.: Well, Sri Lanka is an island off the coast of India. There's two ethnicities there; one the Sinhalese, which is the majority and the government, and the minority, who are the Tamils. That's where I'm from. And my lifetime sort of began there, I spent 10 years, and I was there during when the war started and fled as a refugee to England.

And basically since I fled till now, it's -- there's been a systematic genocide which has quiet thing because no one knows where Sri Lanka is. And now it's just escalated to the point there's 350,000 people who are stuck in a battle zone and can't get out, and aid's banned and humanitarian organizations are banned, journalists are banned from telling the story.

It's just, like, one-sided, 100 percent, and I think it's just escalated because Obama was coming into power, because only under sort of Bush's presidency that you could get away with doing as much as that.

Tavis: When you say there's genocide happening there, what's your sense for why a story of genocide isn't being covered more in the media? Why don't we know more about this?

M.I.A.: You don't know more about it because due to the propaganda -- when you think Tamil, you automatically thing tiger, and that is completely disproportionate. So human beings around the world have to be taught to go Tamil equals Tamil civilians first, and the Tamil Tiger is a separate thing. And both of those groups are different. It's like a square and a circle.

And the thing is there's only 4,000 Tamil Tiger soldiers in Sri Lanka, and if you want, you could just sneeze and wipe them out in a day. They're not that sophisticated with their weaponry and stuff like that -- the Sri Lankan government, which is a million soldiers big, can handle that.

But using those people, we're managing to wipe out the whole Tamil population, the civilians, and that is why you don't hear about it, because the propaganda in the media, because if you're a terrorist organization, you don't have the right to speak, that is passed on to the Tamil civilians. The Tamil civilians don't have the right to speak or right to live, they don't have any liberties.

So that's been the key thing, that when you think al Qaeda, you're not thinking Afghanistan. That if you want to go and fight and kill al Qaeda, then you can, but you can't wipe out Afghanistan. And that's what's happening in Sri Lanka, and I think it's really important for America to understand that, because they set the precedent on how you fight terrorism around the world.

And it's really important that just that sort of throwaway comment, "Oh, Tamil, she must be a Tamil Tiger," actually, the repercussions of that is killing people back home.

Tavis: And offensive, I would assume.

M.I.A.: Yeah, definitely.

Tavis: I'm glad we had a chance to talk about that. I learn something on this show every day, so I thank you for indulging my questions about that. You mentioned -- we were talking about your country you mentioned that you sort of grew up there and you were there for at least 10 years. There were some other years when you weren't there, and I was reading about your background -- you've lived, like, a lot of places. How has that impacted your music, your sound, your style, the fact that you --

M.I.A.: Well, I've lived in India, too, and --

Tavis: Right. And London, and --

M.I.A.: Yeah. I've just always traveled because that's what you do when you're a refugee, and I think it's just impacted me because I'm not judgmental, and I like to hear things from the horse's mouth and I use my own brain to make judgments about what the truth is and what isn't, and I know it from my own experiences what that is.

And I think it's always been that's the thing about my music. Like, I wanted to become a musician and help, like, some sort of change, or stand up for what I believe in, or use music for what it's supposed to be for. And so it wasn't really about getting fame and success and becoming a celebrity and selling records, it was more about bringing together an opinion or a point of view of the other that doesn't usually get heard in the mainstream.

Tavis: You know there are a lot of artists who shy away from that; they don't want to bring their truth, whatever that is, into their music. They just want to entertain people.

M.I.A.: I know, but music was also used for social change. It's not a bad word. And I think we just kind of shy away from it because the pressure of being successful and the pressure of being sexy and standing up for nothing is just so big, you know what I mean? (Laughter.)

Tavis: Yeah, I like that.

M.I.A.: Yeah, so I think that is -- you have to be pretty tough to, like, fight that, and the fact that I kind of had the experiences that I had made me so tough and thick-skinned that it didn't matter what anyone put onto me, but it was more about the people that I was representing.

Tavis: Tell me about the song for which you were nominated for this Academy Award.

[M.I.A shares her feelings about her Oscar-nominated song from the Slumdog Millionaire soundtrack-click for full interview]

M.I.A.: It's kind of stirred up some emotions. I feel like people either love me or hate me, which is good, because that was the point of what I do. The point of M.I.A. is to be -- it's either to be loved or hated. At least you evoke that much of a strong opinion about music.

And "Paper Planes" I think is one of those songs that did that, and people couldn't work it out, and I think it was subversive for some people and it was too obvious for other people. Everyone constantly asks me what it's about, and like, "Are you a terrorist?" And it's like, "No," that has nothing to do with it.

And it could be about gun corporations selling guns and making billions of dollars, or it could be about immigrants coming over and being the scary other that's going to take everyone's jobs. And I kind of want to leave it ambiguous for my fans.

Tavis: Well, you picked the right soundtrack to be on.

M.I.A.: Yes.

Tavis: This movie is huge -- 10 nominations.

M.I.A.: Yeah, Danny emailed me. I was in -- I hadn't -- I wasn't really aware of it, but he went to India and then after he filmed the film he emailed me and asked if I wanted to be a part of it. And I love Danny Boyle. "Trainspotting" is one of my films that I would take to my grave.

And yeah, he basically gave me the opportunity to work on it, and the way I saw it when he showed me "Paper Planes" in the movie, it just looked like the most expensive, well-directed video I could have had for my song. (Laughter.)

So I was, like, "Yeah, great," and it made me cry, actually, when I saw it, because it was just really true and amazing.

Tavis: My time with you is up. Will you indulge me just one time? I want to hear you say your full name. Just say it for me one time, your full name.

M.I.A.: It's Mathangi "Maya" Arulpragasam.

Tavis: I just wanted to hear that. That's all. (Laughter.) I knew I never could. I'll just call her M.I.A.

M.I.A.: It's a Tamil thing.

Tavis: Yeah, it's a Tamil thing. I'll just call her M.I.A. She's nominated for Grammys, Academy Award, baby due on Grammy night -- what a year it is turning out to be for M.I.A. Congratulations on this and all of this, and I'm glad to have you on.

M.I.A.: Thanks.

Tavis: It's my pleasure.

Two of a Kind:Lasantha Wickrematunge and Vijaya Kumaratunga

By Dr. Carlo Fonseka

The premeditated murder in cold blood of the lawyer-politician-journalist Lasantha Wickrematunge in broad daylight, on a highway, in a high security zone is a matter about which I find it impossible to remain silent. If I remember rightly, it was Martin Luther King Jr. who memorably said that our lives begin to end on the day we become silent about things that matter. I count many friends among journalists and when no less than 15 members of their profession have been killed in recent times for plying their pens according to their best lights; my conscience tells me that it is ignoble to remain silent.

I did not know Lasantha personally but I have spoken to him a couple of times on the phone. In 2004 my longtime friend Mahinda Rajapakse asked me whether I would care to write an article to commemorate the 37th death anniversary of his father D.A. Rajapakse. I readily agreed and wrote an article titled “The Rajapakses of Ruhuna” and gave it to him. I expected it to be published in a Lake House newspaper, but it appeared as a beautifully illustrated spread in The Sunday Leader of 21 November 2004. Never before had an article of mine been so conspicuously displayed in a newspaper. So I phoned Lasantha and thanked him though I knew he hadn’t done it for my sake.

Last year I phoned him to complain bitterly that The Sunday Leader did not give me a fair and equal opportunity to refute my dear friend Gamini Weerakoon who writes a regular column in The Sunday Leader. Gamini never tires of pooh-poohing the efforts of The National Authority on Tobacco and Alcohol (NATA) to prevent children from acquiring the smoking and drinking habit by imitating their celluloid heroes on television. Laws have been passed to obliterate such smoking and drinking scenes on television. More than once Gamini criticized and tried to ridicule this policy in his column. Three times the Editor of The Sunday Leader refused to publish my refutation of Gamini’s ill informed conjectural criticisms. Gamini has said that Lasantha greatly respected him because he was his father’s buddy. Perhaps he could not tolerate anybody challenging Mr. Weerakoon – as Lasantha unfailingly called him – in his paper.

Whatever the reason, I felt very angry with him and strongly disliked the stance he took on this matter. Nevertheless, I did not question then, and do not question now, an Editor’s freedom to publish only what he likes in his newspaper and face the legal consequences, if any. It was as an undergraduate that I first read Bertrand Russell’s essay called “What Is Freedom?” Two lines from it remain etched in my old brain: “To tolerate what you like is easy. It is the toleration of what you dislike that characterizes the liberal attitude”.

From that digression necessary to keep things in perspective, I must return to Lasantha who has now achieved iconic status in the wide world of journalism. In retrospect he was a bit like a hero in a Greek tragedy who poised himself against the gods and, even with the knowledge of the futility of the struggle, pressed on until he met his inevitable fate. Lasantha Wickrematunge proved himself to be the most courageous journalist of our time in our thrice-blessed land. One might say that muck-raking was his specialty. He seemed to revel in it. If something particularly nasty about anybody had to be written, no one could do it better than Lasantha.

It was breathtaking to see how hazardously close he could sail to the wind of the libel laws. He went for the jugulars of the high and mighty, caring not a jot even for what Shakespeare’s Othello called, “pride, pomp and circumstances of glorious war”. For a deeply committed Christian he was occasionally extraordinarily uncharitable and rarely even malicious in his flashes of catty wit. Amazingly, in some 15 years of merciless excoriation of assorted people, not once was this pitiless critic who cared naught for the feelings of his targets, successfully prosecuted.

He was murdered on the 8th of January. An editorial poignantly titled “And then they came for me” appeared in his paper three days later while Lasantha was still lying in his unburied coffin. Implicitly he had himself written it in grim anticipation of his impending liquidation. The eternal sceptic in me would sooner believe on the testimony of others that a monkey sang our national anthem than believe that Lasantha had written that editorial for instant replay after his extermination. Is it possible, probable or plausible that he wrote it?

Plausible would be my choice of option. So plausible in fact that the editorial was like a thunderbolt that ripped open our society to demonstrate that the exercise of the freedom of expression could be lethal in our society. The world press zeroed in on the editorial and it quickly became the most quoted piece of editorial comment in living memory. It is an indictment of the government of Mahinda Rajapakse. This distresses me because I too contributed my enthusiastic mite to bring it to power. Thereafter, in these troubled times, I have given this government the benefit of every doubt.

Addressing Mahinda Rajapakse directly the editorial categorically declares that “we both know who will be behind my death, but dare not call his name”. This seems to make Mahinda Rajapakse at once guiltless of Lasantha’s blood but somehow responsible for his death as the principal repository of collective responsibility. The pity of it is that this seriously imperils the good name of an amiable President at the pinnacle of his popularity and glory.

Unarguably Lasantha was the most courageous journalist this country has known. Really courageous men are rare. I have been privileged to know intimately one such. He was Vijaya Kumaratunga. Like the rest of us he wasn’t a perfect human being. Like all of us he had his faults. But unlike the vast majority of us, he was phenomenally courageous and brave and self-sacrificing. Lasantha in his life and death proved to be no less courageous and brave and self-sacrificing than Vijaya Kumaratunga.

He too had a strong wish to live in order to try and remold our country nearer to his heart’s desire. He too demonstrated a readiness to die in the struggle to remold it. He said that he was impelled to write what he wrote by the call of conscience. What Ernest Hemmingway once said applies equally to both of them. “If people bring so much courage to this world, the world has to kill them to break them; so, of course, it kills them.”

National Govt needed for peace through power-sharing plan

By H. L. Seneviratne

maga hondata tibe nam - yanta dasat pene nam
kima badivala yanne - man mulavu ekek se

(If the path is clear and you’ve got eyes to see it, why go in jungles like one who has lost his way.) — Pandit Koggala Dhammatilaka

We as a nation are once more face to face with a choice of paths, the path of reason which will lead us to happiness and prosperity, and the path of delusion which will lead us to misery. We have been at crossroads before, and in our in recent history, it is the path of delusion rather than the path of reason that we have chosen. Nothing however can be gained from complaining about past decisions. The pragmatic and healthy step to is to learn from our mistakes and make the right decision now, and lead ourselves and our children to a happy future.

One of the greatest drawbacks that we as a nation have suffered since we gained independence is the inability of the nationalist sentiment to move beyond bitterness at being colonized. Now and again, nationalist sentiment had surged, on provocations often trivial, and prevented the exercise of sober judgment, and blocked the path of reason. Needless to say it is too bad that we were colonized, but that is past, and is a fact of history. Besides, it is not the fault of our conquerors that we were underlings, of our own making, by means of our petty divisions and betraying our sovereign. If we now do not get our house in order, we have no one to blame but ourselves, and this time around, consequences of faulty action are going to be more regrettable than so far.

With the military successes over the LTTE we are now at a point of surge in nationalist sentiment. This carries with it a fund of public support that can be expended wisely or unwisely. The wise approach is to use it for purposes of establishing a lasting peace, which is only possible through a fair and reasonable arrangement for power sharing. The pressures will be too powerful to obstruct that path, because the unappeased nationalist sentiment, awash in victory, wants its pound of flesh in the form of majority supremacy. And for the leadership, the temptation of that path will be too great as it will assure a new lease of office and power. In the long run however such a step will be suicidal for both the leadership and the nation. It will plunge the nation in protracted instability and unrest, and economic collapse. It will set us on an irreversible path to a Zimbabwe.

It is our bitter and divisive political culture that has so far prevented a reasonable arrangement for power sharing. We know well that when the government in power came up with a plan for devolution, the opposition derailed it, and the same government derailed it in turn when it assumed the role of the opposition, both parties taking turns to appease extremist sentiment. While this seesawing was going on, the nationalist forces were quietly but steadily at work, and gaining strength, and they are now fast eating into the political mainstream. The logical conclusion of this is plainly obvious.

This fateful process can only be arrested if reasonable men and women do what they surely can towards forging a national consensus. In the circumstances we are in, such a consensus alone will lead to happiness and fulfillment for all citizens. The indispensable basis for happiness and fulfillment is economic prosperity, which is possible only through political stability and social harmony. Neither is present today, and if we are to survive as a nation we have no choice but to lose no time in seeking them.

It is therefore necessary for us to forge a national consensus with the resolve that we collectively, all of us, irrespective of ethnic, linguistic, religious, and ideological differences, work together to bring about the basics necessary for political stability and social harmony.

We must further realize that, at this time, a national consensus is best forged and expressed in the formation of a national government for a specified period of time. We must, within that time, resolutely lay the foundation of a stable polity and a strong economy. Once that is done and a measure of social harmony and economic prosperity established, party politics, conceivably of a species more civil than to-day’s, can resume. This I believe is not only an effective formula, but the sole path available to us to avoid precipitation into a Hobbesian or lokaanta war of each against all.

The priorities of such a national consensus and a resulting national government are obvious. The first is restoring peace through a plan of power sharing, and the implementation of the 17th amendment. It is encouraging that appointments to the Constitutional Court are being made. A national consensus and a national government can achieve marvels in a relatively short period of time.

Let me conclude by quoting the Bard:

There is a tide in the affairs of men

Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life

Is bound in shallows, and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat;

And we must take the current when it serves,

Or lose our ventures.

African National Congress urges ceasefire in Sri Lanka

Full Text of ANC Press Release:

ANC0129TC.gifThe African National Congress (ANC) expresses its very serious concern at the unfolding humanitarian crisis that is emerging on the Island of Sri Lanka.

The United Nations and International Red Cross Committee has reported that over 300 000 civilians of Tamil origin are caught in the crossfire in the war that is currently raging in Sri Lanka between the fighters of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) who have retreated into the jungles of The Vanni in the north of the Island

This liberation war between the Tamil Tigers for self determination and the Sri Lankan Government has been going on for well over 27 years and has resulted in the deaths of hundreds and thousands of civilians from both sides of the conflict and much destruction in the country.

The continued conflict in Sri Lanka has been cited on the "human rights watch" international monitoring mechanisms as a conflict now reaching genocidal proportions.

The ANC urges all parties in the conflict, both the LTTE and the Sri lankan Government to call a halt, immediately institute a ceasefire and allow humanitarian aid to be brought to civilians caught in the conflict who are in dire need of assistance. The ANC calls on all political players to immediately return to the negotiating table and resume a peaceful process of finding a lasting political solution to the conflict.

Issued by:
Carl Niehaus
National Spokesperson

Enquiries:
Carl Niehaus 072 343 4007
Brian Sokutu 071 671 6919

ANC: South Africa's National Liberation Movement

UN human rights chief deplores deteriorating situation for civilians in Sri Lanka

GENEVA -- The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay said Thursday she was deeply concerned by reports of the rapidly deteriorating conditions facing a quarter of a million civilians trapped in the conflict zone in northern Sri Lanka, and of alleged human rights abuses and a significant number of civilian casualties, as well as the huge displacement. Pillay also expressed concern at the highly restricted access to the Vanni region for aid agencies and impartial outside observers, including journalists and human rights monitors.

NPTC0129.jpg“The perilous situation of civilians after many months of fighting, multiple displacements and heavy rains and flooding is extremely worrying,” Pillay said. “The lack of access for independent monitors, humanitarian workers and the media only adds to concerns that the situation may be even worse than we realize,” she added.

The High Commissioner cited reports of forced recruitment, including of children, as well as the use of civilians as human shields by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). She also condemned the fact that safe zones promised by the Government have subsequently been subjected to bombardment leading to civilian casualties.

“People trying to flee the conflict areas are reported to have either been prevented from doing so, or to have been arbitrarily detained in special centres,” she said. “It seems there may have been very grave breaches of human rights by both sides in the conflict, and it is imperative that we find out more about what exactly has been going on. It is also urgent that civilians in the north can find safe shelter, away from the fighting.”

Pillay noted that along with the Secretary-General and other heads of UN agencies, she had already expressed her concerns directly to the Government of Sri Lanka. “We are all seriously alarmed by the situation,” she said, “as are many of the NGOs and other organizations operating in Sri Lanka.”

Pillay said the conflict had reached a critical stage: “While the Government has made military gains on one hand, the rule of law has been undermined on the other. The killing of the prominent newspaper editor Lasantha Wickrematunge earlier this month was the latest blow to the free expression of dissent in Sri Lanka. The searing article he wrote prophesying his own murder is an extraordinary indictment of a system corrupted by more than two decades of bloody internal conflict.”

The High Commissioner observed there had not been any successful investigations or prosecutions of political killings, disappearances and other violations committed in recent years.

“It is the Government's duty to provide safety to all Sri Lanka's citizens, whatever their ethnic origin or political views,” Pillay said. “That means not only protecting civilians during military operations in the north, but also ensuring space for journalists and human rights defenders to seek out the truth and expose abuses.”

Pillay added that “a strenuous effort needs to be made to tackle the core problems that have fuelled this conflict for a quarter of a century, in order to bring peace and prosperity and restore fundamental rights and freedoms for all Sri Lankans in all parts of the country.”

Prabhakaran Living in a world of illusion Like Hitler in the Final Days

By B. Raman

An organisation headed by a leader, who understands only terrorism, is unlikely to rehabilitate itself in the eyes of the international community. Prabakaran is a liability for the LTTE and the Sri Lankan Tamils in the post-9/11 world. The time has come for the LTTE leaders and the Sri Lankan Tamils---including their overseas diaspora--- to do an introspection on their future course of action. If they have to preserve the gains made by thousands of their cadres since 1983, they have to find a new leadership. Prabakaran is no longer the man of the future. He is passe. He has become a liability for the Tamil cause. The sooner the Sri Lankan Tamils realise it, the better for them."

Extract from my article of January 22,2007, titled LTTE Avoids Battle of attrition in the East

The reports regarding the desperate plight of about 1,50,000 Sri Lankan Tamils caught up between an advancing Sri Lankan Army and a retreating Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in the Wanni area of northern Sri Lanka are confusing.

Many have reportedly died and many, including many children, have been injured in the exchange of artillery fire between the two sides. In a situation like this, it is impossible to establish whose artillery killed whom. All one can say is that innocent civilians are paying a heavy price for the heavy exchange of artillery.

The Sri Lankan Army is disinclined to agree to a ceasefire to let the civilians be evacuated by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) lest the LTTE take advantage of it to regroup. The LTTE is disinclined to let the civilians move to the safety zones set up by the Government lest this facilitate the advance of the Army.

The international community, including the Government of India, are unable to effectively bring pressure on both sides to help out the civilians. The Sri Lankan Army has estimated that it is only a few weeks away from totally eliminating the capability of the LTTE for conventional fighting and it is determined to achieve that objective even at the risk of some collateral damage to the civilians. The LTTE is afraid that if it lets the civilians go, it will have a face-to-face confrontation with the Army in which it is unlikely to do well.

Prabakaran, who is believed to be still commanding the retreating LTTE fighters, does not seem to realise that the chances of the LTTE staging a spectacular come-back as it did in the 1990s and recaptured Kilinochchi and Mulaithivu are remote. The loss of control over territory in the Northern Province is not so devastaing for him as the loss of control over the Tamil population in the Eastern Province.


In the past, many of the conventional fighters of the LTTE came from the Eastern Province and many of the terrorists from the Northern Province. It is no longer possible for him to get new recruits from the Eastern Province. The recent fighting in the North has indicated that the LTTE's shortages in arm and ammunition and explosives are much more serious than originally estimated. With the rapidly decreasing possibility of finding replacement of human and material resources, his chances of staging a come-back conventionally are much less than what they were in the 1990s.

The terrorist wing of the LTTE also seems to be facing severe problems due to a shortage of explosive material, a drop in volunteers for suicide terrorism and the lack of time and space in the midst of a furious conventional war to motivate and train new volunteers and mount operations.

The use of the civilians to avert an impending final defeat on the ground should be condemned by all the political parties in Tamil Nadu, by the Government of India and the international community. Prabakaran has been living in a world of illusions just as Hitler was in the final days of the defeat of the Nazi Army before he and his mistress committed suicide in a Berlin bunker to avoid being captured by the advancing Soviet Army. Till he decided to kill himself, Hitler was fondly hoping that a reversal of fortunes was still possible.So too, Prabakaran seems to be having a fond hope that he and his men can stage a come-back even at this stage.

It is time for the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora to assert itself and call upon the LTTE cadres to overthrow Prabakaran and other leaders, arrest them, hand them over to the Sri Lankan authorities and proclaim a unilateral ceasefire. It is time for the diaspora to come to terms with the reality and act before more civilians are killed.If they fail to do so and continue to encourage Prabakaran in his irrational illusions, history will judge them harshly.

(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com )

‘We must love all Tamils the way we love Muralitharan’

by Hemantha Warnakulasuriya

Muttiah Muralitharan claimed his 500th ODI wicket, just two less than Wasim Akram. The whole of Pakistan and those in the Gaddafi Stadium cheered loud when Muralitharan achieved the feat of being the second bowler in the world to have grabbed 500 ODI wickets. All over Pakistan photographs of a smiling Muralitharan were published and someone even asked him whether he would be going for the 600th wicket.

In Sri Lanka, after President Mahinda Rajapaksa, the most loved hero and others are from a different playing field. They are all cricketers. I believe Sanath Jayasuriya is the hero of millions and Muralitharan would come very close to him. When Muralitharan delivers the ball, all Sri Lankans believe that it is a dangerous weapon and would destroy the opponent’s wicket. So we love Muralitharan.

As we inch forward in eliminating terrorism from our motherland, we have another mission to accomplish and that is to love all Tamils like we love Muralitharan. This is the only way we can thwart racial bigots from preventing a substantial devolution package being approved in Parliament. The wish of President Rajapaksa is clear: "First, we must eliminate terrorism; secondly, we must eliminate the causes of terrorism". I believe that the second task is as important as the first: we must make all Tamils feel that they are partners in the engine of growth; we must make all Tamils feel that they are not being discriminated against by what happened during the last 30 years.

President Rajapaksa is one of the most anti-racial persons I have known since his days at Law College. Some of his best friends are Tamils and he is genuinely interested in helping them with their grievances. The majority must feel that without a joint effort of all races we can never become a fully developed state. Take Malaysia and Singapore as examples; the contribution that the Tamils made for their economic development is great. We must believe that the defeat of terrorism is the defeat of racialism.

The whole of Sri Lanka wants Muralitharan to play as long as possible to grab 600 ODI wickets. We pray for him that he will have the strength and the capacity to grab 1000 test wickets. We must also pray that we will embrace all Tamils with open arms, even the former LTTEers, so that we can show the world that our country is unique, being the first country to defeat terrorism and ensure peace, tranquillity and security to all for the well-being of the nation.

( Well -known lawyer Hemantha Warnakulasuriya is Sri Lanka's Ambassador to Italy)

Post Mullaitheevu: Tigers have plan A, Plan B and Plan C

By Dayan Jayatilleka

The trick is to grasp the main needs of the present while being able to see into the future, with its problems and prospects, while being aware that the choices we make today, in the here and now, will determine the shape of tomorrow.

First things first: the Tigers have been almost completely overthrown and almost totally defeated, but not yet and not quite. The task is to stay focused and finish the job, resisting all external pressures from whichever quarter however exalted or powerful.

If the foot-soldiers of an army survive but not its General staff, it is almost impossible for it to continue to fight, but as long as a leader and his General staff survive, they can raise an army. Antonio Gramsci reminded us of this, with Napoleon Bonaparte as the classic example.

Velupillai Prabhakaran and his commanders are still alive, and as long as they remain so, they pose a deadly threat to the Sri Lankan state. The war can be said to have been won only when they are eliminated. That remains the task at hand.

The Tigers have a Plan A, B and C. Plan A is to generate an international outcry which, together with Tamil Nadu pressure, will force a halt or slowdown of Sri Lankan armed forces operations, even if it does not result in their best-case scenario of a ceasefire and negotiations. The ludicrous but intentionally diversionary parallels with civilians in Gaza are best countered by reminding audiences that the Sri Lankan state is not preventing civilians from escaping the conflict zones, unlike the Israeli state which kept and keeps Gaza “an iron cage” or “open prison camp”, with its exits -- barring the one controlled by Egypt -- sealed off.Plan B is a sustained slow-burn guerrilla struggle in the Mullaitivu jungles, combined with terrorism in the urban centers. That is the Taliban strategy. This has dubious prospects given that the Sri Lankan armed forces won’t take their eye off the ball as did the Americans, and in any case, there are no Tora Bora mountains and a porous land border for the Tigers to escape into and across.  
 
Plan C, that of escape and re-entry, is best set out by the late Sri Lankanologist Prof Urmila Phadnis’ student Sudha Ramachandran writing in the Asian Times Online (Jan 27):  ‘Pro-LTTE sections of the Tamil Diaspora are in favor of Prabhakaran moving overseas, so that he can revive the LTTE from outside the island and "then strike at the Sri Lankan government at a time of his choosing to free the Sri Lankan Tamil people again". It is expatriate Tamils who funded the LTTE's war for the past several decades, fueling Prabhakaran's dreams of setting up an independent Tamil Eelam and ignoring his at-times brutal rule over the Tamils. And it is this community that he can count on now to provide him with sanctuary overseas’.
Sudha Ramachandran’s essay also hints, albeit unintentionally, at the downside of handing Prabhakaran over to any other country’s jurisdiction in the unlikely event of capture: “…Prabhakaran has been captured alive before. That was in Chennai (then Madras) in 1982, when he, along with a leader of a rival militant group, was arrested for exchanging fire on a busy street. The Sri Lankan government pressed India for his extradition and India agreed. But then things changed. Mass rallies organized by P Nedumaran, a Tamil nationalist who continues to be Prabhakaran's most loyal supporter in India, opposed the deportation to Sri Lanka on the grounds that the two would be tortured there. The pressure worked. India said Prabhakaran would be tried here and stayed the deportation. He never was tried. Prabhakaran was granted bail, which he eventually jumped and went on to wage a deadly separatist war against the Sri Lankan state.”There is only one way to pre-empt these fallback options of the Tigers and their supporters, namely to crush all LTTE resistance, extirpate the LTTE’s leadership and annihilate its fighting cadre in the ongoing campaign in Mullaitivu and whatever un-liberated residue of Kilinochchi. There are those such as the highly regarded General Kalkat who commanded the IPKF, who give credence to the guerrilla option. Talking to him, Kallol Battacherjee of The Week (India, Feb 1, 2009) retraces the important history of the decisive days in the IPKF-LTTE confrontation:“Velupillai Prabhakaran was no mouse in October 1988. …The IPKF captured the land routes of the Tigers. Then they took Wanni, Jaffna and Kilinochchi. At Nitikaikulam, they cornered Prabhakaran. Sensing his end was near he turned tail and escaped through a 7km tunnel into a forest near Mullaiteevu. The Indian soldiers had it easy till then. But what followed was decisive, and still shapes India's response to the Sri Lankan conflict. "The LTTE surprised the IPKF by booby trapping the forest near Mullaiteevu; they knew the terrain like the back of their palm and put up fierce resistance," said IPKF commander Gen. (rtd) A.S. Kalkat. The Indian attack plan was to drive the Tigers from the forest, but Kalkat found that the forest was the Tigers' best ally.” What is Lt. Gen. Kalkat’s conclusion? "It is perhaps one of the most dangerous forests in the world and till the Sinhalese forces defeat the LTTE there, they cannot be called real victors," Kalkat said. For him, the Sri Lankan campaign of 2008-09 is a copy of his campaign of the late 1980s. "The ultimate battle of the Sri Lankan army against the LTTE is yet to be fought".This much is true, but the conclusion he derives or seems to derive, that the outcome is still wide open and victory is uncertain for the Sri Lankan forces, is unwarranted. It is unwarranted because Gen Kalkat tells the truth about Nithikaikulam and the IPKF experience, but not the whole truth. I know, because General Kalkat used to report up the chain of command to general Suneet Francis Rodriguez, the Chief of Staff of the Indian Army who was in overall command of the IPKF operation, and while the Nithikaikulam battle was on, EPRLF founder-leader K. Padmanabha, Suresh Premachandran (deputy leader) and I were in General Rodriguez’ office, with its maps and scale models of the terrain. I was, of course, using an assumed identity.The top brass was gung-ho. The IPKF Para commandos were going in after Prabhakaran, braving the booby traps and the claymores, and may well have got him -- except that politics intervened. As several top Indian personalities including Shri JN Dixit have disclosed, at the same time the IPKF jawans and the Para commandos were risking their life and limb, the RAW was in negotiation with the LTTE’s representative in Madras, Kittu. Those talks seemingly bore fruit, if fruit it was, in the form of a package deal which permitted the LTTE to keep a specified number (300, if I remember rightly) of automatic weapons including M 16s for the personal protection of the leadership, while it came into the mainstream of the Accord. It is possible that Kittu negotiated in good faith, not knowing the real thinking of Prabhakaran who kept his cards very close to his chest. It is also likely that the RAW negotiator (in charge of the Sri Lanka operation and named as such by Lalith Athulathmadali) was already in the LTTE’s pocket or was in the process of being ‘turned’ by the Tigers—something that was suspected only after the Rajiv Gandhi assassination a few years later, though it should have been suspected after EPRLF leader Padmanabha’s murder in Chennai in 1990, the year before Rajiv was killed by the same LTTE cell.RAW chief Anand Verma took the Kittu deal to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and won over some top officials eager to secure the Tamil Nadu vote. Not everyone was that gullible in New Delhi and with the decision making circle divided and in deliberation, a compromise was struck: General Kalkat was asked to draw up encirclement – in the event, involving 5,000 troops. This delay in pressing home the advantage with the elite Para Commandos permitted Prabhakaran to escape, dig in and turn the tables eventually on the IPKF. This he did, not merely militarily but politically and psychologically. JR Jayewardene was still Sri Lanka’s President at the time. Mr. Verma even flew to Colombo to persuade President Jayewardene to endorse a ceasefire with the LTTE but failed in his effort, with JRJ insisting on the total decommissioning of weapons.Even if the Ravana-esque villain of the Indian re-telling of the IPKF tale, namely Ranasinghe Premadasa, had not been born, the IPKF would have been pulled out, because that was a solemn campaign pledge made, in order to win Tamil Nadu, by VP Singh, who triumphed at the general election. This is why the IPKF analogy does not hold, though the Tamil Diaspora and Indian analysts may find some comfort in the thought that Prabhakaran will do to the Sri Lankan armed forces what he did to the IPKF from his redoubt in the Mullaitivu jungles. The IPKF was not motivated, there was political dissent in its rear, the institutions of the state were at variance, the standard armament of the infantryman was the ridiculous SLR (the FN rifle) pitted against the Tigers’ Kalashnikovs and M-16s (mostly purchased with RAW funds or procured through its channels, bypassing the procurement red tape which ensnared the IPKF), and there was hardly any use of tactical airpower—except on October 10th 1987, in Chavakachcheri, courtesy of the Sri Lankan side, a strike that injured Prabhakaran.Of central importance is also the main goal and objective of military strategy. The IPKF had a wholly erroneous goal of pushing the Tigers to the negotiating table. It wasn’t even sure if killing Prabhakaran should be an objective, and it certainly wasn’t one held to consistently. In a brilliant piece of deception, the LTTE fed the RAW who fed the IPKF the nonsense that LTTE deputy Gopalaswamy Mahendraraja alias Mahattaya was a deadlier foe; more anti-Indian because he was allegedly “Naxalite influenced”, and should be eliminated so his baleful influence on Prabhakaran was ended. Rajiv Gandhi was victim of this utterly erroneous reading. By contrast, this time the Sri Lankan government and state have political clarity and a unified will to win. This time, a gutsy Deputy Minister of Defense isn’t having to fight a war while recruitment is drying up due to a unilateral antiwar campaign (“Sudu Nelum”- White Lotus) spearheaded by  a fellow Cabinet Minister. This time the Sri Lankan armed forces have a clear objective: the elimination of the LTTE as a fighting force. This is as it should be, for General Vo Nguyen Giap has said that the goal of all military strategy should be the annihilation of the living forces of the enemy. The IPKF ignored this dictum.The Sri Lankan armed forces have none of the disadvantages and delusions the IPKF labored under. Therefore Prabhakaran cannot perform the same miracle of survival and recovery that he performed against the IPKF. There is something to be wary of though. As the latest issue of Security Index, the premier Russia journal on international security, co-published by the Centre for Policy Studies, Moscow and the Centre Russe d’etudes Politiques, Geneva, says: “America’s serious mistakes in Iraq and Afghanistan were not so much military as political, made well after the main stage of the military operation was over.” (Yuri Fedorov, ‘Black August or The Return of History’, Security Index, Winter 2008/9, p.95)This then is the category of mistakes Sri Lanka must avoid, and be conscious of as the victorious end of the war draws closer like the red sail of an incoming ship on the horizon, to use Mao’s metaphor. These were the mistakes of the Bush administration, and with our own version of the Republican neoconservatives, cultural warriors and religious right-wingers who determined and distorted US perspectives forcing a deviation from Realism, it is the kind of mistake we could easily make. Unlike the USA we will have no Barack Obama to redeem us from their consequences.

(These are the strictly personal views of the writer)

 

 

 

 

 

Winning the war and losing the future for the Sinhala South

By Kusal Perera

"Wars, conflict, it's all a business.
One murder makes a villain.
Millions, a hero. Numbers sanctify." - Charlie Chaplin

It's all now a talk of living in a country free of "terrorism". The Separatist Tigers are almost eliminated. Driven to the forests of Mullaitivu and restricted to lick their wounds, till they are completely annihilated as promised by the Defence head. Ruthless and merciless as no other armed organization on this planet earth, the LTTE had to be cornered, tamed and eliminated politically, long before. That not done in a pragmatic manner, we are told "a full scale war" is the only option "within our unitary State". The hard and rigid position of claiming a non-compromising unitary State in a Sinhala dominated country, perhaps left no other option but a war for the majority psyche that believes it owns this plot of marooned land.

Yet, at what cost ? In rupees and cents, the total is huge. It was 130 billion rupees in 2007 plus a supplementary budget that enhanced the defence allocation by another 15 per cent, half way through the year. In 2008 it was 166 billion plus another supplementary budget allocation of 28 billion, making it a staggering 194 billion rupees for the war, with 177 billion budgeted for 2009, for now. Cost of war is not only the allocated annual defence budgets. It is also the cost of rebuilding and replacing the massive destruction caused to buildings, roads, bridges, rail tracks, electricity pylons and other infrastructure, after the war. How many billions more would we need for that ? That in rupees or dollars is not the total lost in this war. Add the productive cost of a society, how ever meagre that may be, that was and is being lost over the years due to war.

A very educated professional considered a friend by me, told me, "War has its own cost any where. It takes lives and there is no point in counting them. Its so in Iraq . Its so in Gaza ." Whilst Iraq and Gaza does not justify a weeping and bleeding Vanni, but only makes it two plus one in human tragedy, he and his family are fortunately living in a very secure urban residency in Colombo, 450 km away from all the innocent people who speak a different language to his, who are dying, left destitute and in hunger and pain. With broken and shattered families, politically and ideologically distanced from the Sinhala polity. That cost of war tragedy has no assessment in rupees and cents in a modern civilised world.

Is that all ? No. Count the number of Sinhala youth who are permanently limping around you. Those who have their adult life maimed. Count the number of young widows who are staring blank into the future, with a fatherless infant on her lap. Count the little children who are often used as "exhibits", standing in rows for politicians to grin at them, the children of "war heroes". Make a note of all those teenage village girls who frequent the Anuradhapura town for a living, waiting to be picked up by vacationing young soldiers. They are looked after by organised mafia and the underworld is infested with army deserters in large numbers. Some allegedly used by powerful politicians.

Is that all ? Sorry. There are more. More that goes unaccounted and unaudited socially. The Sinhala society that supports the full scale war has also come under a sledge hammer of a rigidly regimented defence establishment that by now has become an indispensable factor in political decision making. The organised social fabric that defines and decides democratic functioning of the society is shredded. The media had been openly coerced into compromising and to live as told, through threats direct and indirect. With gunmen on motor bikes and white vans. The Sinhala society accepts with glee, the political explanations wrapped in military priorities doled out by this defence establishment in defending all that suppression and also how the democratic structures should behave in its day to day life. The judiciary has been ignored by the Executive to maintain its own indemnified power. The political regime uses all those regimentations in society to live an unchallenged, unquestioned life seeped in corruption, nepotism and political arrogance. Protests are allowed at the expense of protest leaders running the risk of meeting masked armed men on motor bikes and white vans there after, who would never be tracked down. Any dissent in society, any deviation in perceptions thus comes under brutal suppression.

The Sinhala society has been herded into this subordination and this subjugation on the twin slogan of "patriotism against Tiger terrorists" and "supporting the war heroes". What has now emerged is a totalitarian regime on the strength of crushing the LTTE terrorism and accepted and given the honour to be just that by a citizenry that for now wish to live with that euphoria. Like it or not, that's where we have come to in accepting a full scale war against Tiger terrorism and that's from where we would have to wake up, to see what the future holds for us amongst all this debris and human carnage left.

Right now, it's India and the international community that talk loud. The international community that lived to see a bloody human tragedy evolve, issuing diplomatically phrased statements blaming all sides and asking for respect of international law protecting civilian life, from a government they themselves accused of impunity in violating basic human rights, has now hurried to assess the possible rehabilitation of the devastated areas. Yasushi Akashi was around and in Trincomalee, meeting the Eastern Province Chief Minister too, in his 17th visit as a peace envoy to talk about humanity and development, even before the SL military entered Mullaitivu.

India that blundered at a heavy cost trying idiotically to manipulate in teaching the Jayawardne government a lesson by training and teething the armed groups, rushed Pranab Mukherjee, acting PM and Minister for External Affairs, to Colombo when the government was being accused in Tamil Nadu of targeting thousands of displaced and stranded civilians trapped in cross fire, with government forces pushing hard towards Mullaitivu. Indian strategy was always clear with Delhi only worried of Pakistani presence. Given the annihilation of LTTE and Prabhakaran, the armed menace they nurtured and promoted for a long time, Delhi would try to placate Tamil sentiment to the extent it would not embarrass the Rajapaksa government.

What more would you expect from a selfish world ? Till the next phase of armed Tamil politics gather its own strength and justification to fight on for yet to be honoured dignity as equal citizens in a shared country, the Rajapaksa government and its extensions would be showered with soft loans and grants for "rehabilitation and reconstruction of devastated life". It would now have the right to continue as it did through war. The carpet of savage suppression doesn't have to be rolled back. The South agreed to have it spread out all these years. Why roll it back now ? All indications are, that "patriotically bloodied" repressive carpet would now be legalised and strengthened for political arrogance to walk on. All indications are, with such change, the military would continue in politics. "Winning the war does not mean I have finished my job." said the Army Commander to the Daily Mirror a fortnight ago. "I have other work. I have to strengthen the army." he said.

It’s a big price the South would have ended up paying to live without Tamil separatism. Without a decent and a sane Opposition that does not know it's in the Opposition to challenge an overstepping government. It's the price of living without its own democratic life for the South.

Bob Dylan's definition of "peace" - the moment when you reload your riffle

Beyond Sri Lanka’s ‘War on Terror"

by Darini Rajasingham Senanayake

It looks like one of the more winnable conflicts in an age of the global ‘war on terror’. The Sri Lankan government appears to be on the brink of announcing victory in its drawn-out battle against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). The armed separatist group, listed as one of the world’s most dangerous terrorist groups, has fought successive Sri Lankan governments for over a quarter of a century in the guise of liberating the island’s Tamil community from a state that has increasingly marginalised linguistic and religious minorities. However, the question remains as to whether the victory would be pyrrhic when finally manifest, consolidated on irreparable damage to the county’s increasingly fragile democratic institutions and centuries-old multicultural, multi-religious and hybrid social fabric.

Several conflicts have been assimilated to the global ‘war on terror’ in the aftermath of 9/11 and the United States-led global ‘war on terror’ that casts a long shadow in South Asia. In 2006, the conflict in Sri Lanka was officially renamed a ‘war on terror’ after a highly internationalised Norwegian-brokered ceasefire agreement collapsed. Prior to that, the past quarter of a century of violence punctuated by three abortive peace processes, was known as an ‘ethnic conflict’ or a ‘liberation struggle’, depending on the perspective. The current government has worked hard to portray its battle against the LTTE, now in its final stages, as a ‘war on terror’. This time the top priority is to recapture the island’s northeastern territories controlled by the LTTE’s quasi-state, and the LTTE leader, Velupillai Prabhakaran, who is also wanted by India for assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.

One is familiar with the adage ‘one man’s terrorist is another’s liberation fighter’, a phrase that was common in many parts of Asia, Africa and Latin America during the era of post-colonial struggles for self-determination and independence from European empires. The Sri Lankan government also terms the current bid a ‘humanitarian war’ to liberate innocent Tamil civilians from the grip of an organisation that has held people as a buffer and human shield to deflect the onslaught of the military and air force. On the other hand, the LTTE claims that it is seeking to liberate Tamil-speaking people from the abuse and humiliation meted out by the post-colonial state dominated by the majority Sinhala community. There is good evidence to suggest that minority communities in Sri Lanka have had a raw deal in the form of discriminatory policies on language, education, land settlement and development. There have also been episodic riots and pogroms against minority Tamils and Muslims since independence in 1948.

Clearly the conflict in the island is complex and it is necessary to look beyond the blame game between the two principle protagonists and the gloss of the ‘war on terror’ to seek sustainable solutions. After all, sustainable peace would need to be based on an analysis and address of the root causes of conflict. In the case of ethno-nationalist guerrilla movements such as the LTTE, once a group loses territory, it may melt into the people and return years or decades later to fight, if the root causes of the conflict are not addressed. Several long-term, low-intensity conflicts that predate the global ‘war on terror’ in South Asia make this apparent.

Democracy as Collateral Damage

At independence from Britain in 1948, the prognosis both for democratic governance and development in the island nation then called Ceylon was generally rated excellent. Sri Lanka was considered a ‘model democracy’ with an established record of peaceful co-existence between diverse ethnic and religious communities until the armed violence erupted in the early 1908s. Its social indicators (literacy, health and education), were the envy of much of the developing world in the decades of the 1960s and 1970s, and they remain the best in South Asia.

Nobel prize-winning economist Amartya Sen was fond of referring to Sri Lanka and its particular development model and trajectory as an ‘outlier’ because of high levels of social development despite relatively low per capita income. Later it was expected that the island, given its size and ethno-religious mix, would develop like Singapore rather than Malaysia which was seen to have an uneasy ethnic peace [1]. Lee Kuan Yew’s Singapore was indeed the role model for the J. R Jayawardena regime in the late 1970s and 1980s. However, somewhere along the way, the country’s politicians and policy-makers seemed to lose the plot and were subsequently ambushed by the LTTE, which in its early days was funded by India’s intelligence agency, Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), during the period of proxy wars of the Cold War. Although the LTTE was started locally in the late 1970s to secure the rights of a minority marginalised by the state, it subsequently morphed into one of the world’s most ruthless terrorist groups.

After the ethnic riots of 1983 which may be better described as a pogrom, the LTTE grew exponentially. A quarter of a century of violence killed over 70,000 people, mainly in the north and east of the country, and displaced between 5-10 percent of the island’s 20 million people. The LTTE forcibly evicted the Muslim minority population from the northern Jaffna Peninsular in 1990, claiming they were a security threat to the Tamil homeland. A significant number of Tamils displaced in the conflict between the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE have formed a powerful disapora in North America, Europe, Australia and parts of South Asia and Southeast Asia, and from afar, they have contributed to sustain family members and communities as well as subsidise the conflict in their homeland. It was largely with the funds generated from the diaspora that the LTTE was able to run a de facto state for almost a decade in the northern and eastern parts of the country. However, its territory has been slowly but surely retaken by the ongoing military offensive of the government to ‘liberate’ the Tamil people.

It was against this backdrop that the first week of 2009 saw the fall of the capital of the LTTE’s de facto state in the north of the country. A few days later, troops gained control of the Elephant Pass base and the A-9, the main trunk road that links the southern capital, Colombo, to Jaffna, the cultural capital of Sri Lanka Tamils. Celebrations were held throughout the country while government institutions hoisted the national flag. The capture of the LTTE’s capital was termed ‘an incomparable victory’ and the President used the rhetoric of the ‘war on terror’: “What our heroic troops have achieved is not only the capture of the great fortress of the LTTE, but a major victory in the world’s battle against terrorism”.

For 23 years, parts of the A-9 highway had been controlled and sealed off by the LTTE. The securing of the highway means that travel between Jaffna and Colombo would no longer need to be by sea or air and would bring down the cost of living in the Jaffna peninsular. The Sri Lankan government also plans to roll out reconstruction and development plans for Kilinochchi, now a ghost town vacated by civilians fleeing the military onslaught and air force bombing campaign to dislodge the LTTE from bunkers dug deep in the earth. Simultaneously, the first two weeks of 2009 saw a dramatic rise in refugees arriving in South India. According to the International Committee of the Red Cross, the only humanitarian organisation operational in the conflict areas, 200,000 people have been displaced.

It is axiomatic that, as externalised threats are perceived and nations go to war, civil liberties and rights in the domestic sphere are eroded. This phenomenon was observed by Max Weber, a founding father of the discipline of sociology. Within days of the celebrations following the capture of LTTE’s de facto capital, one of the island’s leading journalists, Lasantha Wickrematunge, Editor-in-Chief of the Sunday Leader newspaper, a liberal anti-establishment paper known for exposing corruption and nepotism in the state apparatus, was assassinated in broad daylight in Colombo.

At his funeral, where thousands gathered, an effigy of the Sri Lanka’s President, Mahinda Rajapaksa, was burnt. The slain journalist’s funeral was attended by political leaders, media representatives, civil society organisations and senior foreign diplomats in Colombo. The slain journalist, who was also a lawyer, had penned his own obituary three day’s before his assassination: “And then they came for me”, naming in all but words his killers. His final editorial published posthumously which has come to be known as the ‘letter from the grave’ constitutes a powerful indictment on the regime that would be hard to shake off in a country where astrology, the symbolic and uncanny, carries significant weight in politics. Minimally, the state is accused of promoting a ‘culture of impunity’ that has rendered Sri Lanka ‘one of the world’s most dangerous places for journalists’ according to the organisation, ‘Reporters without Borders’.In the past two years, at least eight journalists have been killed in the country, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.

As the war (including an information war) has escalated, the phenomenon of extra-judicial killings has risen. Wickramatunge’s assassination was in the wake of a series of killings and intimidation of journalists and lawyers, and attacks on independent media institutions in the south. A few weeks earlier, the largest independent television station in the capital, MTV, criticised by segments of the state of being unpatriotic, was attacked by a masked gunman in a city teaming with security forces. A few months earlier, the house of a leading lawyer and head of Transparency International, Sri Lanka, who had appeared in several fundamental rights cases, was struck by grenades. In August 2008, Sri Lanka lost its seat in the United Nation’s Human Rights Council and has since turned down several requests of the United Nations Human Rights Commission to set up an observer mission to monitor the situation in the country.

Needed: An Exit from Violence

Implicit in renaming the conflict in Sri Lanka a ‘war on terror” is the suggestion that the current war is a ‘just war’, which has elicited considerable support from members of the international community engaged in the global war on terror. The challenge of war, be it a ‘just war’, ‘humanitarian war’, a ‘war on terror’ or even an oxymoronic ‘war for peace’ is to avoid destruction of the lives, institutions, values and ideals sought to be liberated or protected. The LTTE, which began as a movement for the rights of a minority community against state discrimination, over time morphed into a self-sustaining war machine that has sapped the strength of the very community it sought to protect. During the decades of conflict, there have been several rounds of negotiation with the assistance of the international community. However, the LTTE has failed to grasp the opportunity to negotiate peace for the war wary and depleted population that it seeks to ‘liberate’.

The armed group has been, for some time now, fighting a war of diminishing returns. The globally networked organisation, which draws support from a significant diaspora in North America, Europe and Asia, has been banned in many countries. Likewise, successive regimes in Sri Lanka have periodically used an emergent ‘war economy’ to benefit from violence, while extended periods of Emergency Rule has seen the attenuation of the rule of law, while a growing culture of impunity has stymied investigation of grave human rights violations, corruption, and rent-seeking behaviour by state actors, non-state actors and paramilitaries. Hence the conflict has been also referred to as a ‘dirty war’.

Over the two and a half decades of conflict, a variety of politicians, members of the defence industry and paramilitary groups had acquired illegal personal profit and political power as the economy periodically morphed into a ‘war economy’. Sri Lanka seems to be in the midst of one such cycle. At the same time, the regime may be increasingly dependent on the use of majoritarian nationalism and the militarisation for survival, given the soaring cost of living with one of the highest inflation rates in South Asia. Sri Lanka has the largest defence budget in South Asia in percentage terms. At the November 2008 budget, President Rajapaksa, who is also the Minister of Finance and whose brother is the Minister of Defence, promised to raise defence spending by seven percent to a record US$1.6 billion in 2009, according to figures presented to the Parliament.

In his inauguration speech, Franklin D. Roosevelt remarked, “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself - nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyses needed efforts to convert retreat into advance”. Naming a complex conflict such as Sri Lanka’s ‘war on terror’ may be counterproductive. Indeed as John Sidel, a specialist on Indonesia noted in his book, “Riots, Pogroms, Jihad”, that since 9/11 an industry of terrorism experts has reframed diverse types and forms of complex political conflict in South Asia and Southeast Asia. To call Sri Lanka’s complex conflict simply a ‘terrorist war’ or an ‘ethnic conflict’ is to get history and indeed geography wrong. For it is necessary to talk of state terrorism in the same breath, as the LTTE is no doubt vicious terrorism which has included violence against the very community it seeks to liberate, including the assassination of those who do not agree with it, recruitment of women and child soldiers, and perfecting the suicide bomb.

There is little doubt that the LTTE engages in terrorist acts and combating it requires special measures. However, renaming Sri Lanka’s complex conflict a ‘war on terror’ may leave little space for the reasoned analysis required to understand and address the root causes of the conflict so as to ensure a lasting political solution that would underwrite sustainable peace. The quarter of a century-long conflict in the country cannot be solved by military means alone. It would require a political solution that ensures power-sharing with the minorities in the north and east. Otherwise the LTTE would very likely regroup and return to fight another day, as has occurred in the past. However, because the current regime in Colombo has key nationalist parties as its allies, it seems unlikely that it would be able to deliver a genuine power sharing package at this point in time. The All Party Representatives Committee, convened almost three years ago to formulate a political solution, has yet to deliver a solution acceptable to all Sri Lankans, particularly the island’s minority communities.

Epilogue

Arguably, it was in recognition of the collateral damage that the global ‘war on terror’ inflicted on democratic rights, values and the rule of law that United States President Barack Obama, in his inauguration speech, signalled a change in strategy and method to deal with threats to peace, “As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our founding fathers faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world and we will not give them up for expedience’s sake”. The global ‘war on terror’ may no longer be expedient for states that are required to address complex domestic identity conflicts through genuine power sharing agreements.

References

Horowitz, Donald, 1989, “Incentives and Behaviour in the Ethnic Politics of Sri Lanka and Malaysia”, Third World Quarterly October, 1989.

Sen, Amartya, 1993, “Capability and Well being” in The Quality of Life. Amartya Sen and Nussbaum, Martha C. eds. Oxford. Clarendon Press.

Sidel, John, 2007, “Riots, Pogroms, Jihad: Religious Violence in Indonesia”. Cornell University Press.

January 28, 2009

Amnesty charges Govt and LTTE of violating laws of war

Reports emerging from Sri Lanka suggest that government forces and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) are violating the laws of war by targeting civilians and preventing them from escaping to safety.

Amnesty International has received information that the LTTE has, in at least one instance, prevented injured civilians from moving to safer areas or accessing medical care, an act that could constitute a war crime.

“Recent fighting has placed more than a quarter of a million civilians at great risk. People displaced by the conflict are experiencing acute shortages of humanitarian aid, especially food, shelter and medical care. There has been no food convoy in the area since 16 January,” said Yolanda Foster, Amnesty International’s Sri Lanka researcher.

The Government of Sri Lanka is carrying out military operations in areas with a civilian population. The aerial and artillery bombardment has reportedly led to civilian deaths, injuries, the destruction of property and mass displacement.

Sri Lankan government forces have pushed the Tamil Tigers out of all major urban areas they had held for nearly a decade and into a small pocket of land. More than 300,000 civilians who have fled the oncoming government troops are also trapped in this small area. They have been displaced multiple times and are increasingly vulnerable as fighting moves closer.

Hundreds of people have been killed or injured and such medical care as has been available is threatened due to danger to the few health workers and damage to hospitals.

The government had declared “safe zones” to allow civilians to seek shelter, but information made available to Amnesty International indicates that several civilians in the so-called safe zone have been killed or sustained injuries as a result of artillery bombardment.

A doctor working in a hospital in a “safe zone” says that about 1,000 shells fell around the hospital.

A convoy of 24 vehicles, arranged by the Red Cross and the UN to transport up to 300 wounded people, including 50 children, was stopped from leaving the area by the LTTE.

The UN says it will attempt to help evacuate the wounded for a second time, if permission is granted by LTTE and if a lull in the fighting permits. They hope to cross the frontline at midday Thursday.

Targeting civilians and carrying out indiscriminate attacks by any party to the conflict violates international humanitarian law.

“The immediate priority is medical attention for the seriously wounded. The Tamil Tigers must let injured civilians go” says Yolanda Foster, “Preventing civilians from accessing medical care constitutes a war crime.”

Govt just cant blame everything on the LTTE says HRW

(New York) - The Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) should take immediate steps to allow thousands of civilians trapped in a shrinking conflict zone safe passage and to ensure that they receive desperately needed humanitarian aid, Human Rights Watch said today. Intense fighting between the Sri Lankan army and the separatist LTTE has caught an estimated 250,000 civilians in deadly crossfire, and in the past week civilian casualties have risen dramatically.

"The situation for hundreds of thousands of vulnerable civilians trapped in the Vanni war zone is becoming increasingly dangerous," said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. "Both the government and the LTTE need to take urgent action to prevent large-scale civilian deaths."

The LTTE has long prevented civilians under its control from fleeing to government-held areas. As the LTTE has retreated into its stronghold in the northern Vanni area since the start of a Sri Lankan army offensive in October 2008, the rebel group has forced civilians deeper into territory they control. An estimated 300 local staff members of the United Nations and international humanitarian organizations are trapped in the Vanni because the LTTE refuses to allow them to leave for safe areas. Altogether, an estimated 250,000 civilians are now trapped in the small part of Mullaittivu district that remains under LTTE control.

The Sri Lankan government has contributed to the risk to civilians by detaining those who have managed to flee LTTE areas, including whole families, in militarized detention camps, denying them freedom of movement.

"Civilians are scrambling for shelter in an area that is under heavy artillery fire, including many children, wounded, and elderly who need urgent assistance," said Adams. "The UN and concerned governments should press Sri Lanka to take all necessary steps to spare civilians from harm."

Over the last week, reports of high civilian casualties from the fighting have been reported by the few doctors in Mullaittivu district. The Sri Lankan army says it created a "safety zone" for civilians inside the war zone, but there are credible reports that shelling has occurred inside this zone.

According to the United Nations, a compound sheltering UN national staff inside the safety zone was shelled on January 24 and 25, killing at least nine civilians and wounding more than 20. On January 26, another artillery attack narrowly missed UN local staff working in the safety zone, but reportedly caused dozens of civilian deaths. In a January 27 statement, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) expressed concern that "[h]undreds of patients need emergency treatment and evacuation to Vavuniya Hospital in the government-controlled area." Because of government restrictions on the movement of journalists and human rights monitors, Human Rights Watch could not independently verify this information.

Military spokesman Brig. Udaya Nanayakkara told the media that "There were no civilians killed," and added: "We are targeting the LTTE. We are not targeting any civilians, so there can't be any civilians killed." Human Rights Watch said that the Sri Lankan military's blanket rejection of any civilian deaths in the latest fighting raised serious concerns about its genuine willingness to minimize future civilian casualties.

The government-ordered September 2008 withdrawal of all UN and nongovernmental humanitarian organizations (with the exception of the ICRC and Caritas) from the Vanni plunged the region into a serious humanitarian crisis, with acute shortages of food, shelter, medicine, and other humanitarian supplies. The humanitarian crisis was documented by Human Rights Watch in its December 2008 report, "Besieged, Displaced, and Detained." A companion report, "Trapped and Mistreated," focused on LTTE abuses against the civilian population in the Vanni.

"The government's near-total news blackout from the war zone prevents Sri Lankans and the rest of the world from knowing the full extent of the humanitarian crisis in the Vanni," said Adams. "The government can't just blame everything on the LTTE and wash its hands of responsibility for protecting civilians."

The conflict in Sri Lanka is governed by international humanitarian law. Human Rights Watch has long urged both the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE to abide by the laws of war, including taking all feasible precautions to minimize harm to civilians during military operations and ensuring that civilians have access to humanitarian assistance.

Hard to Achieve Peace When 'They Just Want the Tamils... Wiped Out'

by Stephanie Nolen

Reaching a political solution to conflict in Sri Lanka seems next to impossible

COLOMBO, SRI LANKA — Sri Lanka's National Peace Council has long had two goals: first, a negotiated end to the country's 25-year-old civil war, and second, a political solution based on federalism.

"I suppose the first goal is gone," Jehan Perera, the council chair, remarked with a bit of dry despair a few days ago.

There seems to be little hope for a negotiated settlement, as the Sri Lankan armed forces claim to be within days of taking complete control of the island country, ending the rule in the north of the rebel Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

So what of the peace council's second goal: a political solution to the conflict that would incorporate both the demands of the Sinhalese majority as well as the minority Tamil population, long the victims of legally sanctioned discrimination?

Dr. Perera is an optimist and hopes the government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa - who with his brother Gothabaya, the Defence Secretary, launched this crushing strike at the Tigers 18 months ago - can be magnanimous in victory.

"The hope lies in the fact that the President was in the past a human-rights campaigner, when he was in the opposition," Dr. Perera said.

"Because he has been fighting a war he had to have the Sinhalese extremists with him, but once he wins the war he won't need them. Maybe then the President will surround himself with different advisers. That's what we have to hope, that when the situation on the ground changes that our leaders will change accordingly."

Yet it seems unlikely that President Rajapaksa has any plans to negotiate. His stated goal is to eliminate "any trace" of the Tigers. And two weeks ago, his government "proscribed" the Tigers, making it illegal to talk to them.

Nor is it clear whom the President could have negotiated with, in any case: The Tigers, in their iron reign over the area they called a homeland, moved with cold precision against anyone else who tried to speak for Tamils.

"The Tigers wiped out genuine leaders of the Tamil people - now they have neither guns nor political leaders of any eminence," observed Dr. Perera, who is Sinhalese. "For peace to be just, it has to be negotiated between equals" but such a dialogue is now impossible, he said.

Many Tamils agree that their community is woefully without a representative. "We have never had good leaders," said Ram Ranmohan, a Tamil businessman in the eastern city of Trincomalee who is a respected community elder and advocate of a non-violent resolution to the conflict. "But then, we have had no place for good leaders."

A Norwegian-led peace process that had in the past led to ceasefires and some confidence-building measures has been moribund since President Rajapaksa, seemingly intent on solidifying his own political fortunes, and utterly indifferent to calls for a negotiated settlement, launched his multipronged military offensive in 2006.

Few observers of that peace process believe the Tigers participated in those talks with any sincerity: Tiger leader Velupillai Prabhakaran would seem either to have had a misguided belief his movement could win a military victory or because of his egomaniacal desire to rule even his small fiefdom at the expense of pursuing a greater peace that would erode his power.

President Rajapaksa has promised Tamils their "peace and freedom" will follow the end of the LTTE, a pledge met with considerable skepticism by international observers here. "This government says all the right things but they speak with forked tongues," said a Western diplomat who is not authorized to speak on the record. "They just want the Tamils crushed and wiped out."

The diplomat suggested that traditionally Tamil areas would likely continue to be under heavy military occupation, while a few showpiece development initiatives are undertaken.

Mr. Ranmohan said that Tamils are worn down by the fighting and living under both regimes - either Tiger or Sinhalese-majority government - and have little energy left for anything but survival. "Probably we will be like your ... Indians, pushed into a reservation," he said. "It's going to be a terrible ending and the scar will be there for generations."

Dr. Perera, however, clings to the hope that the country now has, at the very least, the opportunity for change. "Maybe on the positive side, the problem that has blocked progress in Sri Lanka for 30 years - at least that is over and the stalemate is broken and there is possibility of progress. The focus will move from the military and open up space for political issues," he said.

"When war diminishes, people will once again demand freedom and the space to articulate their views."

'How can people say this is peace?'

by Stephanie Nolen

Eastern Sri Lanka chafes under the oppressive rule of a government that says it is committed to democracy

TRINCOMALEE, SRI LANKA — In the local office of Sri Lanka's national Human Rights Commission here in this eastern seaside town, they have statistics: Ninety-eight people were abducted in this area last year, snatched off the streets by the infamous white vans with no licence plates that are used by government security agencies. Eighty-five other Tamils simply disappeared. At the commission they have case files and police reports.

But none of the staff will talk about them. "We are helpless," one staff member said apologetically, ushering a visiting journalist out of the office. "We would like to help the people but we have to be afraid for our lives, too."

And who do they fear at this government office?

The government.

Eastern Sri Lanka offers insight into what the north of the country - the area that until weeks ago was held by the rebel Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam - will soon look like. The Tigers have lost all but a tiny portion of their territory to a punishing air and ground assault by government forces, launched by a president determined to end the country's 25-year-old civil war to win elections in April. He promises peace and development for the civilians of the north, where long-time oppression of the minority Tamils by the Sinhalese-dominated government helped to create a powerful secessionist movement.

Until 2006, this swath of the east was also held by the LTTE. But infighting within the Tigers, which Canada and many other nations list as a terrorist organization, led to a split and the rebels of the east soon allied themselves with the government.

Today the government holds up Eastern Province as a model of its magnanimity, pointing out that elections were held there shortly after its military control was established, and that a Tamil party headed by ex-rebels won the region.

"The President has shown his commitment to honourable peace in Eastern Province; those people were given the chance to elect their own people. They know they are being represented, not neglected," said Lakshman Hulugalle, spokesman for the Ministry of Defence.

But international observers said the poll was marred by rigging, violence and intimidation, and the provincial government is dominated by ex-fighters from the breakaway Tamil faction who have little support from the population, which resented the rebels' often oppressive rule. Indeed the Chief Minister of the province is Sivanesathurai Santhirakanthan, better known by his nom de guerre Pillayan, which he acquired when he joined the Tigers as a 14-year-old fighter. Today he is ostensibly the most powerful man in the province, a claim he rejects with a small, tight smile.

"The government is eliminating terrorism, offering a political solution, and that is how I have been elected Chief Minister," he began in a recent interview in his office, then added, "I have become a chief minister but I have not received powers from Colombo. For the past six months Colombo says, 'This is not the right time to devolve powers.' They say they will give them in time."

Most local and international observers - even Mr. Hulugalle of the Defence Ministry - predict that when the LTTE loses control of all its territory in the north it will launch an underground, Iraq-style insurgency. The Tigers have since the first days of their fight used suicide attacks on civilians, including those at prayer in places of worship, as one of their standard tactics.

"The LTTE will go to the jungle as resistance, and even if there are a few hundred of them, the government has to maintain a military presence in the north; their residual force will require suspicion of all Tamils," said Jehan Perera, head of the National Peace Council. "The situation is likely to be the same or much worse than in the east - the soldiers, the questioning of people, the difficulty of getting private business to invest there."

And the peace of the victors will be a cold one for the Tamils, he predicted. "They say they will be doing infrastructure, building roads and that kind of thing, but it will all be done by the central government, and this conflict grew in the first place from the view the central government is Sinhalese and doesn't take their interest into account," he said.

Thus the streets of Trincomalee, banded every 150 metres or so with checkpoints where Tamils are grilled about who they are and where they are going and whether they can prove they do not support the LTTE, offer a grim vision of what the north will soon be like.

"What democracy do we have today?" asked the president of a respected local development organization, too afraid to be quoted by name. "We cannot meet, we cannot talk, even if someone sees us now, the security will come and ask what we are discussing. Every time you leave your house it's like you are going to court to face charges."

Sure, he said, the government has built a few roads (using Sinhalese-owned contractors and only Sinhalese labourers), and yes, he got to vote, for the first time in decades. But that is cold comfort, he said. "You can put a parrot in a nice cage and feed it nice food like apples but it's still a caged bird."

Pillayan, the Chief Minister, knows people are frustrated, and said that the situation will change. "The central government gave assurance that the 13th amendment [to the constitution, which promises power-sharing with the Tamils and other minorities] and even more will be there," he said. "We still have hope."

Yet as frightening as the disappearances, and perhaps more likely to cause further conflict over time, is the government's unabashed campaign of "Sinhalization." Historic sites commemorating ancient Tamil kingdoms have, in the months since the government took control of the area, suddenly become memorials to Sinhalese kingdoms. Some Tamils stopped at checkpoints can no longer give the names of their home villages, because those places have new Sinhala names, local and international human-rights monitors say.

The government recently announced that the fishermen of Trincomalee were back to catching their prefighting hauls of fish, but neglected to mention that it continues to deny all but a handful of Tamil fishermen the right to put to sea (citing the security risk that they might ferry supplies to the Tigers) and has instead brought in Sinhalese fishermen from the south, to whom it affords much more freedom.

"All the land seized as a 'high security zone' in the 2006 fighting is still in the hands of the military, and you have tens of thousands of people stuck in resettlement camps where they aren't allowed to fish and don't have land to farm and have a miserable existence," said one United Nations employee who was not authorized to discuss the situation on the record.

UN agencies, which are feeding civilians on both sides of the conflict and supporting a host of development projects across the country, as well as other aid agencies, are routinely denounced in the state-controlled Sri Lankan media as overt partisans and backers of the LTTE, a fact that both hinders their work and has the effect of blunting their criticism.

There is an additional layer of tension in the east because the LTTE is still present here, albeit underground - a situation that will be doubly true in the north. The rebels continue to pressure the Tamil population to provide funding and other support for the nationalist cause, and attempt to enforce vote boycotts and other obstacles to peaceful political participation.

In the anxious offices of the Human Rights Commission, investigators are regularly reminded by their government masters that official policy is: All is well in the east. And they despair. "How can people live like this?" a staff member asked. "How can people say this is peace?" [courtesy: the globe and mail]

In Pictures: Vanni humanitarian crisis

The office of the Regional Director of Health Services in Kilinochchi said in a communiqué today Jan 28th: “Disaster situation is at peak. Civilians are running to find safest place. Staying at Bunkers is the maximum safety. But unfortunately heavy rains flooded the bunkers. Deaths and injuries are common among IDPs living places. Many feel they should not be the next victims. People are hopeless on outside help. They are praying for better life”

injured mother crying.jpg

[Injured mother]

Civilian casualities 2.jpg

[Civilian casualties]

Civilian casualities 3.jpg

[Civilian casualties]

Civilian casualities 4.jpg

[Civilian casualties]

Civilian casualities 5.jpg

[Civilian casualties]

Civilian casualities 6.jpg

[Civilian casualties]

Civilian casualities 7.jpg

[Civilian casualties]
DSC01029.jpg

[Civilian casualties]

IDPs at Hospital primises.jpg

[IDPs at Hospital Premises]

Injured child.jpg

[Injured child]

Udayarkaddu hospital  under shell attack.jpg

[Udayarkaddu hospital under shell attack]

Udayarkaddu temporary hospital 2.jpg

[Udayarkaddu hospital under shell attack]

[Pictures by: RDHS]

January 27, 2009

Sri Lanka: Major humanitarian crisis unfolding

Colombo / Geneva (ICRC) - Hundreds of people have been killed and scores of wounded are overwhelming understaffed and ill-equipped medical facilities in Sri Lanka's northern Vanni region, following intensified fighting between the Sri Lanka Security Forces and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

"People are being caught in the crossfire, hospitals and ambulances have been hit by shelling and several aid workers have been injured while evacuating the wounded. The violence is preventing the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) from operating in the region," said Jacques de Maio, ICRC head of operations for South Asia in Geneva.

The terrified population is in need of protection, medical care and basic assistance, according to the ICRC.

An estimated 250,000 people are trapped in a 250 square-kilometre area which has come under intense fighting. They have no safe area to take shelter and are unable to flee.

"When the dust settles, we may see countless victims and a terrible humanitarian situation, unless civilians are protected and international humanitarian law is respected in all circumstances," said Mr de Maio. "It's high time to take decisive action and stop further bloodshed because time is running out."

The ICRC urgently appeals to both sides to allow and facilitate the safe and voluntary movement of civilians out of the combat zone.

The ICRC is determined to stay as long as possible in the Vanni, but the parties must respect its presence and its work. Humanitarian assistance must be allowed to enter the Vanni and aid workers and their premises must be protected from shelling and looting, as required by international humanitarian law.

Both sides are strongly urged to spare the lives of those not, or no longer, taking direct part in the fighting. Hundreds of patients need emergency treatment and evacuation to Vavuniya Hospital in the government-controlled area.

In response to the crisis, the ICRC is stepping up its support for Puthukkudiyiruppu Hospital in the Vanni. The ICRC, which is the only international aid agency to have remained permanently in the Vanni over the past four months with the agreement of both sides, continues to work alongside the Sri Lanka Red Cross Society helping those in need.

For further information, please contact:

Carla Haddad Mardini, ICRC Geneva, tel +41 22 730 24 05 or +41 79 217 32 26
Sarasi Wijeratne, ICRC Colombo, tel +94 11 250 33 46 or +94 773 1588 44

ICRC News Release Jan 27, 2009

Killing of Civilians:Hands of Both Govt and LTTE are Tainted

By Col R Hariharan

The security forces have captured Mullaitivu, the last bastion of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). This is comes as the icing on the cake of their achievements in the war against one of the toughest insurgent forces in the world, which has no hesitation in using terror tactics. However, the security forces have to address an issue that is disturbing not only to NGOs and UN humanitarian agencies but to many others who are no sympathisers of the LTTE.

In the last few days almost all international news agencies have reported the death of a number of civilians in Sri Lankan air strikes and artillery shelling carried out repeatedly to soften up the LTTE defences in support of the advancing security forces. A report of the Associated Press quoted Sri Lankan health officials saying that at lest 30 civilians were killed in a single day on January 20 due to shelling on a school and a hospital in the newly declared safety zone. The fact that the TamilNet, the pro LTTE website, had been reporting such deaths of civilians almost every day does not minimise the gravity of these incidents. Hundreds of civilians have died in such firing; even Indian newsmen who had been to Mullaittivu have confirmed it. One Indian reporter has spoken of heaps of dead bodies lying outside the makeshift hospital in Mullaittivu.

The death and injury among civilian population used as the human shield of the LTTE is caused when the security forces use artillery fire and air strikes to neutralise the LTTE pockets embedded in the midst of civilians. So it cannot be condoned as inevitable "collateral damage" of war. Such reports are even more serious if death and destruction of civilians come from an area that is supposed to be "safety zone". So it is not surprising that the issue has drawn strong criticism worldwide.

Deaths of civilians and displacement of population from their habitations are perhaps the two most certain events in any war. When a society unleashes war as a solution, such happenings are to be expected. And war is also the biggest violation of citizens' basic right to life and property. The expectation of privation is no consolation to the hapless population struggling just to survive between the foes. So what both the government and the LTTE do to mitigate their suffering is as important as winning or losing in battlefields.

It is in the nature of air strikes and artillery bombardment to cause death and destruction in areas around the target. Even with all the technology for precision strikes, both air and artillery fire has inherent probability error in hitting the target area. In fact even the most accurate artillery gun has to correct its fire for every target with a couple of salvos before it opens its barrage on the target. This is done to minimise error of shells not hitting the target. Such an area would extend to a radius of at least 100 yards around the target. That is how the damages from 'collateral' causes occur. As it is inherent in the use of artillery fire to call it collateral is absurd. The use of artillery fire and air strikes in civilian areas regardless of compulsions is to be condemned strongly because it is so inhuman.

Unfortunately bombs and bullets do not discriminate between soldiers and "human shields" or hapless civilians trying flee the battlefield. In times of war, displaced population have neither the resources nor energy to take protective measures taken by the troops. Women and children form bulk of such civilian casualties because they cannot run as fast as men to safety.

The security forces are repeatedly told to exercise caution while using their fire power. War is not a cricket match; it is each man fighting not only to save himself, but to kill the enemy to fulfil his commander's mission. That is why soldiers are trained to become part of a gigantic killing machine that armies are. Their principles of war tell them to use superior force with preponderance of fire power while maintaining their objective. Under such compulsions of war, expecting the security forces to enforce a zero civilian casualty policy is extremely difficult if not impossible. So it is for other government agencies to take measures to ameliorate the fall out of battles on civil population well in advance and train them on how to save themselves.

In this regard the hands of both the government and the LTTE are tainted. The security forces have stepped up the use of artillery including multi barrel rocket fire and air power even as the LTTE areas are shrinking every day increasing the density of civilians per square kilometre. And the role of the LTTE is despicable and heartless. Even the UN has critically commented on the LTTE's cynical strategy of not allowing civilian population to get out of the battle zone, even though it knows that it is not going to defend the area unto death of the last of its cadres.

The government run by an elected body of people's representatives cannot absolve its responsibility in this respect by blaming the LTTE. As an organised government its norms are clearly defined and public accountability is an essential part of it. It is expected to perform better than the LTTE which has no pretension of such niceties and has only its leader Prabhakaran's edicts as norms of functioning.

Media is the conscience keeper of society. When the government fails to operate according to the norms of governance, it is the duty of media to report it. This is more so in times of war, when people accept the curbing some of their fundamental freedoms in the national interest. Unfortunately, the Sri Lankan media feels increasingly insecure when they face violence and intimidation directly or indirectly from elements of government or suspected to have close connections with it.

President Rajapaksa had been enjoying better press than his predecessors and most of the other politicians. In spite of this, his repeated reassurances on media freedom have not made much headway because other limbs of the government continue add a new episode to media confrontation almost daily. What is surprising is the government attitude to the media trying to report on the war, when only government is the "authorised source" of information. The latest in the government's firing line was the BBC Sandeshaya for quoting the civilian casualty figures given by a representative of Mullaittivu hospital in its report. Media men dig for news from any available source when they are denied independent access to the happenings. This is what is happening

Victory in war is a heady thing. It can cloud government's perspectives on fundamental issues of governance. Victories in battlefields would not mean much in the long run if people do not feel secure and trust the government. The opposition Janatha Vimuthi Peramuna leader put it aptly: "These war victories can be meaningful to the people only when democracy is restored." Unfortunately, Sri Lanka is giving the impression that this is not happening.

After Mullaitheevu: Fate of Prabhakaran and Future of LTTE

By Col R Hariharan

The capture of Mullaitivu, the last big town under the control of the Liberation of Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), in a way came about as abruptly as Kilinochchi on January 25. But 59 Division of the Sri Lanka security forces which captured Mullaitivu had to fight its way through in some of the worst terrain against well fortified defensive positions. The fall of Mullaittivu was not unexpected. In fact in my article in the Hindu last week, I had said, "With such a large force confronting them, the LTTE cadres defending Mullathivu are facing a situation that is not dissimilar to what they faced during their defence of Kilinochchi, which crumbled after the government forces broke through the perimeter defences. Mullathivu might face the same fate with the final assault going through as a walk-in into a ghost town."

Only this time around, the approaches to Mullaitivu pulled some surprises with the strong resistance east of Dharmapuram up to Viswamadu-Viswamadukulam. Security forces had reported blasting of the Kalmadukulam tank by the LTTE and flooding the Dharmapuram, Ramanathapuram, and Viswamadu areas to stall the advance f the security forces. According to the media, occupying an area of five square km this tank was the second largest in the north.

However, the LTTE cadres in defending area between Puthukkudiyiruppu and to its south and west have little chance of holding on with approximately five divisions converging on it from three directions. 55 Division advancing along Nagarkovil-Chundikulam axis in the north captured Chundikulam crossing the lagoon of the same name. It plans to link up with 59 Division in Mullaitivu which would close the last bit of free access to the sea between Mullaitivu and Chundikulam to the LTTE.

The chief of LTTE Velupillai Prabhakaran has become elusive even as a lot of hype was built up by the security forces about his presence in Mullaitivu area. As the Sri Lanka expects to rout the LTTE completely by March 2009, Prbhakaran's whereabouts become crucial after Mullaittivu's capture. The LTTE has been silent on speculations about its supreme leader, having lost its tenor due to the fading fortunes of war.

The Sri Lankan army commander Lt Gen Sarath Fonseka has claimed that 95 percent of the LTTE is "finished." Territorially speaking he is probably correct. But I am sure the security forces know that would not be the "real" 95 percent of the LTTE unless most of the cadres are killed or caught and the weapon inventories of the LTTE are accounted for. They also would acknowledge Prabhakaran has to exit the Sri Lanka scene for "finishing" the LTTE finally.

His continued leadership is vital for rebuilding the LTTE to survive another day. He has been the guiding spirit of the LTTE in war and peace all these years and many of the followers would not know what do without his command. More than that, he has not allowed the rise of any other leader to the stature of being his successor. As the LTTE revolves around Prabhakaran his death or apprehension could fold up the LTTE. His fate is also interlinked with the fortunes of his acolytes and fellow travellers both at home and abroad, particularly in Tamil Nadu.

Just before Mullaittivu fell, there had been widespread speculation in Sri Lanka media that he might have gone to Kerala or Tamil Nadu or even Penang State in Malaysia. All the three regions, where pockets of LTTE sympathisers exist, are not in the good books of Sri Lanka. However, at present these stories appear to be more fiction than factual.

With these stories, the Sri Lanka intelligence agencies probably hoped to demoralise the LTTE cadres defending Mullaitivu.

The LTTE cadres at the battle front are out of touch with Prabhakaran. This is not surprising as Prabhakaran normally does not join frontline battles though he keeps close touch with operations. The Tiger leader is also known to change his location frequently even in normal times. These are sensible survival precautions of a paranoid leader who has made too many enemies. And that is how he has survived. The Prabhakaran mystique is built as much on his low visibility and as the high secrecy of his location.

But where is Prabhakaran? Despite inspired stories about his departure to India, Malaysia or elsewhere, he runs the risk of being arrested in most of the 37 countries the have banned the LTTE in some form or other. Only Myanmar, Thailand and Kampuchea could become destinations of a fleeing LTTE leader. Of course, South Africa and Eritrea are touted as two other possibilities. But both are too far and travel would be too risky for the LTTE leader. The LTTE had a history of striking deals with corrupt elements of Myanmar military regime. But its socially downtrodden Tamil ethnic population has little influence and the military regime might sacrifice Prabhakran in adversity. Kampuchea where the LTTE had been buying his arms and Thailand where the LTTE has some clout with powerful Sri Lankan Tamil expatriates appear to be the only possibilities.

But own assessment is that given his doggedness built around the goal of achieving Tamil Eelam, Prabhakaran might not quit Sri Lanka to the comfort of Sri Lanka government. Tamil Nadu and Kerala coasts are the easiest to reach. Tamil Nadu in particular is an attractive destination for Prabhakaran because LTTE has built support assets there. However, it could be extremely risky also. Prabhakaran may welcome Indian coast for the limited use as a transit point before sneaking out to one of the western countries where death sentence does not exist and such leaders do get accommodated. After all Britain still has given refuge to one of the most wanted Chechen terrorist leaders. So Tamil Nadu and Kerala would do well to be on guard as Sri Lankan boats getting abandoned on India coasts have been repeatedly reported since last December.

January 26, 2009

Torn apart by unrest, Tamil family longs for freedom

by Stephanie Nolen

Vavuniya, Sri Lanka: When he saw the pair of young women walking up to his front door, Anthony T knew his family had not escaped.

Months before, he had at last succeeded in scraping together loans for $50,000 (U.S.) and paid a smuggler to get his son to Canada as a refugee claimant. He got his oldest daughter into pre-college bioscience studies. He thought, then, that his children might be spared.

But 18 months ago, recruiters for the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam came to the home of Mr. T, 57, a coconut and rice farmer whose identity has been confirmed by The Globe and Mail but will not be published due to concerns for the safety of his family.

The young women spoke at length to Mr. T and his family about the Vietnam war. "They told us it was a long war that no one thought the Vietnamese could win, but that they endured and it was a people's war and they won in the end," Mr. T recalled a few days ago with a small, painful smile.

He had managed to send his son out beyond their reach but now the Tigers wanted one of his daughters. "I never thought they would come for her."

During the past 18 months, the government has used a massive military offensive to squeeze the LTTE in all directions, and yesterday announced that the army had seized the northern town of Mullaitivu, the rebels' last stronghold - although no journalists are allowed in the area to try to confirm this.

"The Sri Lankan army captured the Mullaittivu bastion completely today," Lieutenant-General Sarath Fonseka, the army commander, said last night in a speech after LTTE fighters had been driven out of the town earlier in the day.

The guerrillas have come back from near-obliteration before, but this time it seems likely that their control over the north is ended.

The end didn't come soon enough for Mr. T's daughter. The recruiters came back to their home, in a village 12 kilometres from Mullaitivu, three more times. His daughters were terrified, he said, and didn't want to go; their parents were equally afraid. So the Tigers turned up the pressure, taking Mr. T himself away for "questioning." They only held him for a day, he said, but their message had been effectively delivered: when he arrived back home, it was to find his three daughters arguing over whom should go, so that their father would not face incarceration or worse. They decided in the end to send the eldest, who was then nearly 18, because her educational background might get her a job as a medic, and perhaps some security away from the front lines.

So she went, just as the Sri Lankan government intensified ground and air attacks on the area where the LTTE had long run a sort of autonomous semi-state. And so began Mr. T's days of worry, an anxiety that has sharpened to corrosive fear as the Tigers lost their capital, Kilinochchi, three weeks ago, and then, day by day, were pushed back up against the sea. "It's all I think about, all I can ever think about," he said.

Mr. T, a quiet, grey-haired man wearing a pale blue sarong, relayed all this in Vavuniya, the "exchange point" where some civilians are allowed to pass between army and Tiger territory. He came down a few days before, bringing a nephew in urgent need of medical treatment; as the oldest family member, he was the least likely to incur the suspicion, and possible detention, by the Sri Lankan government when he crossed out of rebel territory.

Since he arrived, he has learned his family has been almost constantly on the run, driven from one area to another by aerial bombing and by the Tigers.

The practice has been condemned by the United Nations, which estimates that as many as 300,000 civilians have been trapped now between the opposing forces. "Pretty soon there will be nowhere to go but into the sea," Mr. T said quietly.

The LTTE has been fighting since the mid-1970s for an independent homeland for Sri Lanka's Tamil minority, which continues to be oppressed by the Sinhalese majority that dominates the national government.

The Tigers have been listed as a terrorist organization by countries, including Canada, because of their use of suicide attacks on civilians, and have long been condemned by human-rights organizations for their forcible recruitment of soldiers, including a great many children.

He has lost all hope that the LTTE will maintain their "independent homeland" in the north, and in some ways, he won't miss them, dragging off people's children and constantly demanding "donations" for the cause, as soon as he had saved a few rupees.

Yet at the same time he fears the repression that will come with living in a militarized north under government control. "Intelligence has a list of whose family is in the LTTE," he said. "If we cross over here, we will be under surveillance and persecuted."

All the options are bad, he said simply. "There is no saviour, neither the LTTE nor the government." But neither side cares how he and people in his village feel, he added.

"It doesn't matter who we are living under, it has to be without violence. We are not troublemakers. We want to live in peace, independence and dignity. We want the same facilities and rights that people enjoy in the rest of the country: education, jobs and access to land. If we have this, then there won't be any problem."

Now he waits in Vavuniya, desperate to go home, or as close to it as he can manage, in case his daughter is either released by the Tigers, or manages to slip away.

"Maybe, maybe, I will be able to get to her and somehow I can get her away. We can all get away." [courtesy: The Globe and Mail]

January 25, 2009

How many more?

By Kshama Ranawana

Lasantha Wickramatunge is dead. A strident voice brutally stilled. Hot on the heels of his assassination an attempt was made on the life of yet another veteran journalist, Upali Tennekone, the Editor of the sinhala weekly, Rivira.

Lasantha’s killing has unleashed a storm of protests –unprecedented even, with condemnation coming from all quarters- human rights bodies to the US State Department.

Judging by the vast crowds that attended his funeral on Monday, January 12th, and the demonstrations that ensued, it seems that his assassination jolted the conscience of a cross-section of society. Rather reminiscent of another abduction and killing eighteen years ago, that of journalist and actor Richard de Zoysa. He was killed during yet another intolerant regime, and when State forces were battling both the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna. Journalist Sivaram’s killing too evoked anger and despair. Neither of those killings however, sparked such an outcry as Lasantha’s did.

The gradual erosion of fundamental rights began with the enshrinement of constitutional changes introduced in the early 1970’s. Yet, Sri Lankan’s have, for the most part shrugged their shoulders and got on with their lives. “If it does not affect me, it does not matter” seems to be the creed that many live by.

Richards killing gave birth to groups such as the Mothers Front and the Free Media Movement; associations which are constantly attacked by those who support corrupt leaders. The brave few, who carry on regardless and call for negotiated solutions and turn the spotlight on the breakdown of law and corrupt deals, are branded unpatriotic.
That is a label pinned on any person or organization (NGO’s in particular) that dares speak on issues other than applauding the war on terror. Such attacks, have oft’ times been led by those who fancy themselves as “professional journalists!”

Richard and Lasantha shared many similarities; they hailed from privileged backgrounds, hobnobbed with the nation’s elite and were English language journalists known both locally and internationally.

Yet, scores of other less known journalists, media rights activists and those affiliated with the profession have been killed, abducted, assaulted and harassed. Just days before Lasantha was killed the MTV/MBC networks was set on fire, as was the Leader Groups press in November 2007. Not even newspaper distributors have been spared. A majority of the incidents took place in the north and the east, and spread southwards as military successes increased. More than fifty such incidents have been recorded both in 2006 and 2007.

Non-media persons too have paid the price for their efforts of safeguarding the rights of civilians and minorities. All of these incidents have been recorded, protested and mourned by a handful of human rights defenders.

The use of violence and censorship to keep the truth from being told is indeed the tools of the cowardly; who live with the mistaken belief that wiping out the “trouble makers” would silence all dissent.

How many more Lasantha’s, Richarads, Keith’s, Namal’s, Raviraj’s, Maheswarans and Tisanayagam’s and Upali’s must it take for Sri Lankan society to awake from its slumber? We’ve stood by and watched while those who hold the reigns of power destroy a once peaceful society. It is time that genuine patriots support the few who are unafraid to call for reform. It is still not too late to work together to ensure that every Sri Lankan feels at home, and make our country the vibrant democracy it used to be.

“No matter that patriotism is too often the refuge of scoundrels. Dissent, rebellion and all-round hell- raising remain the true duty of patriots”. -Barbara Ehrenreich, professional pot-stirrer

January 24, 2009

Caught between the Tigers and the tanks

by Stephanie Nolen

VAVUNIYA, Sri Lanka — Every day, the women get up in the cool of early morning and walk a few kilometres north to the heavily fortified checkpoint that stands between them and their families. And every day a kindly staffer from the International Committee of the Red Cross tells them that they still cannot cross.

So they turn away from the barbed wire and stacks of sandbags and camouflage and walk back into town, where they squat in the shade of the main government office, waiting for the road home to open — and knowing it won't, until home has changed so much that they will scarcely recognize it.

TC0125A.jpg

[A medical staff wheel an ethnic minority Tamil child patient, who was injured by heavy combat between Tamil tigers and government military in the Tamil rebel territory, at a hospital in Vavuniya, about 260 kilometres (160 miles) north of Colombo January 22, 2009. - Reuters-via Yahoo! News]

These women (along with their children and a few old men) come from a war zone — a region of Sri Lanka called Vanni, where until a few weeks ago the vicious Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) maintained a de facto independent state Now, a punishing air, sea and land campaign by the Sri Lankan military has driven the Tigers into a tiny corner of the north, their backs against the bright blue sea.

In their retreat, the rebels have taken with them most of the civilians who lived under their control — an estimated 300,000 people.

One of the world's longest-running conflicts, the 25-year-old civil war in Sri Lanka, seems to be entering its final phase of conventional warfare.

The Red Cross says an unknown number of civilians have been killed and injured since President Mahinda Rajapaksa set out in 2006 to crush the LTTE — which most Western countries, including Canada, consider a terrorist organization, best known internationally for carrying out grisly suicide attacks on civilians.

The rebels now hold an area no bigger than 30-by-30-kilometres, around the northern city of Mullaitivu. They have been pinned down before and fought their way back to power, but most observers think this is probably their end as a controlling force.

However, this war, which has already cost the lives of at least 70,000 people, seems certain to get much bloodier before it ends, as the cornered Tigers dig in and prepare to unleash their considerable arsenal.

The United Nations has issued repeated calls for the Tigers to release civilians and for the government to treat them well. The assumption is that all the civilians in the north would flee if they could.

A few have managed to get out, and these people stand on one side of the checkpoint, awaiting a long and unpleasant "security screening" by government soldiers hunting for any sign they have links with the Tigers. Those who pass muster — and most men 14 to 45 years old don't even bother to try — are waved through and taken to a refugee camp, where they will live behind thick coils of razor wire, forbidden to leave.

But no one here is talking about the other line in Vavuniya, the one five times as long — the line of people desperate to go back the other way. No one admits what it says about the chances for real peace in Sri Lanka that so many people see more hope for their families in a war zone than in the calm of the government-held side.

But the Tamil women here have no trouble explaining it. Each has come across in the past few days or weeks to seek medical treatment or write exams, as part of a system of exchanges between LTTE and government territory that, surprisingly, kept functioning through the worst of the war until now.

"I'd rather go back and die with my family than be here alone," says Kala, a 29-year-old schoolteacher (like many others here, she is afraid to be quoted with her full name). Kala's family has been displaced at least three times so far in the fighting; in the five days since she left to bring an aunt to the hospital here, their village has been shelled and her family is on the run again.

"I had a phone call from my three-year-old daughter screaming, 'Mommy, come home,'" Kala says, tears on her cheeks. "We are trapped between the government forces and the LTTE. We are trapped between both sides with no idea what to do."

The LTTE won't allow whole families to flee south, but even if it did, Kala says she would be petrified that her husband would disappear after the crossing. Young Tamil men are frequently detained on suspicion by the armed forces — by law, they can hold a person 18 months without charge; in practice, confinement can last much longer.

"If I am there, I can guard him," she says. "When they come with their questions — 'Who are you?' 'What are you doing?' — I can say, 'This is my husband. This is my daughter's father, leave him.'"

COLONIAL LEGACY

Sri Lanka's conflict has its roots in historic tensions between the majority Sinhalese population, who are mainly Buddhists, and the minority Tamils, who are mostly Hindu — tensions deliberately exacerbated by the British colonial administration in a divide-and-rule strategy that lasted until independence in 1948.

In the 1950s, to cement its power, the Sinhalese-dominated government began a series of overtly chauvinistic actions such as making Sinhala the only official language, giving special status to Buddhism and passing a law that said Tamil students required higher marks to enter university than Sinhalese students did.

There were communal riots — which international organizations, including Human Rights Watch, describe as state-sponsored — in which tens of thousands of Tamils were killed or lost property. The then-president called the killers "heroes of the Sinhalese people."

There was a corresponding rise in Tamil nationalism, and in the 1970s the LTTE, having killed off Tamil leaders who favoured a non-violent push for federalism, emerged as the dominant force demanding an independent Tamil nation in the north and east of the country.

The ensuing conflict was largely ignored by the outside world until the 1980s, when the Tigers unleashed fleets of suicide attackers, whose most famous victim was Indian prime minister Rajiv Gandhi — killed by a young female LTTE fighter who bent to touch his feet in a gesture of veneration before triggering the explosives beneath her sari.

The LTTE did not limit itself to political or military targets: It blew up buses full of poor rural people and slaughtered worshippers at one of the holiest shrines of Buddhism.

Nevertheless, the vast majority of the 70,000-plus casualties of the war have been Tamil civilians, and hundreds of thousands have been displaced. Nearly half the Tamil population has fled, the bulk of them to Canada, which has the largest population of Sri Lankans outside the country — at least 300,000, two-thirds of them in the Toronto area.

Periodic peace efforts, spearheaded by Norway, have yielded little. Most observers agree that LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran was never serious about negotiations. Both sides violated ceasefires. The last one broke down with the launch of this military campaign.

The government has promised that after its military victory, it will begin intense reconstruction and development efforts in the north to demonstrate to Tamils that they will be equal citizens. "The President has promised a just and honourable peace," says Lakshman Hulugalle, a spokesman for the Ministry of National Defence.

Earlier this month, however, the government "proscribed" the LTTE, making it illegal to talk to the organization and closing the door on any negotiated settlement.

BATTLING ACCOUNTS

It is impossible to obtain precise information about what is happening in the north, which the government has completely sealed to both Sri Lankan and foreign journalists. Both sides blatantly manipulate the information they release.

"We have zero damage to civilians and the minimum to our forces," says Mr. Hulugalle. "The downfall of LTTE terrorism is very near." Official reports say the Tigers are now pinned by the army on three sides and blockaded by the navy from an exit by sea.

On their websites, though, the Tigers insist they have not lost territory but rather strategically withdrawn to position themselves better for a fight; that they have killed thousands of government troops; and that the armed forces' air and artillery strikes have left hundreds of Tamil civilians dead.

United Nations officials say privately that the Sri Lankan military has indeed taken thousands of casualties. And while the government insists that no more than 1,000 or perhaps 2,000 Tiger fighters remain, senior staff with aid agencies and diplomatic missions (not permitted to speak on the record) say that the real figure may be as high as 40,000 of the most seasoned rebels and that the Tigers have brought their weaponry from across the northern territory with them into Mullaitivu.

There is feverish speculation on the whereabouts of Mr. Prabhakaran, the shadowy Tiger leader. Some say he has left the country, after sending out his family — his sister, for example, lives in Toronto. But most people here believe that he is still on the island and that he will fight to the end with his much-vaunted cyanide capsule worn around his neck to make sure he is not taken alive.

"He says he will fight to his last breath for us," says one older man in Vavuniya who is in his fifth day of waiting for the border to open. Then he adds, with a sardonic smile: "Whether we like it or not."

Meanwhile, an unknown number of people is stuck in the middle of the increasingly fierce fighting. How many, again, depends on whom you ask: The government says 100,000 at most. The Red Cross says perhaps 200,000. But it's at least 300,000, according to United Nations staff working on the ground in the north with the few agencies that are sporadically bringing in humanitarian supplies.

"We have been able to get basic supplies to them, but they don't have what they need," says Neil Buhne, a Canadian who is the top UN official in Sri Lanka.

"Many have moved 10 times, sometimes more, and they're very scared, scared of everything, as any population in this situation would be. It's important that every effort be made to protect them — that they be allowed to come out if they want to, or stay if they want to stay."

The government says the Tigers are holding the civilians in the north, using them as human shields and not letting them flee. The LTTE uses a cold, calculated system of "bail" for any Tamil who wants to leave its area — the person must "post" a relative or close friend, who will be taken for manual labour or to fight if the person does not return in a specified time.

The practice has been widely condemned by human-rights organizations, but the people waiting in Vavuniya simply see it as part of life.

Kala's brother-in-law offered to be her bail; she does not know where he has been since their village was bombed, but she has no doubt the Tigers will find him if she doesn't come back.

Yet bail is not the only explanation for why, even in the thick of war, she and many others still wait and want to go home.

"We want to die together," says Nandini, 27 and in the middle of a high-risk pregnancy that brought her over the line of control for tests.

She has chafed against the restrictions of LTTE rule most of her adult life, but she is desperate to get home — even though bombers have come low over her village, 10 kilometres from Mullaitivu, for weeks. "Either we live together or die together."

INSURGENCY IN WAITING

Army commanders say it is a matter of days or weeks at most until they control the whole north; diplomatic and aid workers say it could take several months.

But there is agreement that the all-out military strategy embraced by Mr. Rajapaksa and his brother, Secretary of Defence Gotabhaya Rajapaksa (a former software engineer in California's Silicon Valley), has been a military success.

The campaign has combined heavy air attacks with multi-pronged advances by army brigades.

The forces have reclaimed an area called Elephant Pass, which links the peninsula of Jaffna in the north to the main island. But their most conspicuous success was the capture on Jan. 2 of Kilinochchi, which the Tigers for years called the capital of their independent homeland, with a parallel civil administration including customs and taxation offices and banks.

The news was greeted with jubilation in the streets of Colombo, the national capital. But the noise of celebratory firecrackers was, within hours, dwarfed by the explosions of two Tiger suicide attacks that left several military officers dead.

There is a sense here that any declaration of victory by the government would be hollow, as the Tigers will switch to a different sort of war, using the shelter of the dense jungles of the north and a community still hungry for freedom to wage an Iraqi-style insurgency.

"There will be for the next couple of years bombs coming up — they will be able to do it, but they won't control areas," says Mr. Hulugalle, the defence spokesman. "It's very difficult to crush it 100 per cent, we accept that. The war will be over, but terrorism will be there."

As a result, he says, the government will be obliged to maintain its vast network of checkpoints and other "security measures" loathed by the Tamil population, which include sealing off prime land, restricting civilian movement and barring fishermen from going to sea.

The new phase of the conflict could be just as grim as the last, in its effects on the civilian population and on the prospects for development in Sri Lanka.

"As the government congratulates itself on its glorious military victories, the old proverb applies: They have won the battle, but they haven't won the war," says one Western diplomat.

CORRUPTION AND IMPUNITY

Tamils and other opponents of the government who look around the country today will probably take little comfort in the promise of a just peace.

The east — which came under government control in 2006, after the No. 2 Tiger leader split off with several thousand fighters and allied with Colombo — remains heavily militarized and is actively being "Sinhalized," with areas losing their Tamil names and Hindu shrines being converted to Buddhist worship sites.

Meanwhile, two weeks ago in the capital, the country's leading anti-corruption journalist was assassinated by gunmen on motorbikes, a crime the government limply condemned. International observers put the blame squarely on state intelligence agencies.

"They whacked the most influential editor of a newspaper in the country in broad daylight, with real military precision," the Western diplomat says. "It's the work of armed groups funded by the intelligence agencies and reporting to the Secretary of Defence — that's the prevailing point of view.

"There is a complete culture of impunity here. There is a perception that the government can do whatever they want — and they can."

That leaves the civilians of the north facing two equally odious choices.

"Helpless Tamils are pressured by both sides," says a weary government employee in Vavuniya who is charged with looking after the civilians who cross from the north. He is Tamil himself.

"People find it very difficult to live in a war zone with bombing and shelling, and they would leave if they could. Then the government says it wants to safeguard them and then puts them in a jail.

"People only want freedom. But we don't have that anywhere," he says, then adds ironically: "I blame Tamils for being born Tamils — that's who I blame in the end." [courtesy: The Globe and Mail]

Stephanie Nolen is a Globe and Mail correspondent based in New Delhi.

January 23, 2009

Sri Lanka can build peace only with new spirit of the Obama Age

by Dayan Jayatilleka

So the darkest hour was indeed just before the dawn – however dark the hour and however faint the dawn. I refer to the torment of the Gazans which was brought to a halt in time for the inauguration of Barack Obama as the 44th President of the United States of America.

BHOTC0124.jpg

It is a new dawn for the United States , and also, though not as brightly and unambiguously, for the world. It is a new dawn for the people of the USA , after a long struggle against slavery, segregation, racism and racial discrimination, and more recently the economic philosophy of free market fundamentalism. It is a new dawn for the United States as a country. It has set an example by electing an outstanding personality, by revealing and restoring its better self, by showing itself to be a progressive society and by choosing someone who is committed to correcting the country’s course. Already it is looked up to again, and by its new combination of reason and resolve, is on its way to reasserting its global role by acclaim as much as by assertiveness.

Barack Obama sets us an example of enlightened patriotism, of which there is far too little in many societies including our own. Far too many of us are either blindly uncritical patriots or are so aware of our country’s weaknesses and crimes that we have renounced all patriotism if we ever had it. Obama’s patriotism like that of Martin Luther King is one which is acutely aware of his country’s weakness and the stains on its history but is as aware of its strengths and potentialities, and convinced that these strengths outweigh or can be made to outweigh its weaknesses, restoring to it its proper role in the world. As he writes in his second book, his heart “is bursting with love” for his country. Obama grew up acutely aware of the prejudices in mainstream society, but unlike many academics and educated professionals in Sri Lanka who are disdainful of the masses, he can discern the best qualities of the many; he appreciates and loves the people.

President Obama’s patriotism sets us an example in its multiculturalism. In Sri Lanka patriotism is held to be the preserve of the cultural majority. Somehow, only the Sinhala Buddhists are thought to be authentically patriotic or nationalist. Patriotism is identified with the notion of purity, while admixture, hybridism, cross fertilization is not seen as a source of richness but of bastardization and “mongrelization” (“thuppahi”). The nation is supposed to be constructed around the Sinhala Buddhist cultural core, the dominance of which the minorities must accept and buy into. The minorities, or should I say the minoritarians, for their part mirror an inversion of this view and do not fully subscribe to a Sri Lankan patriotism or sign up for Sri Lanka’s struggle against its enemies.

Barack Obama’s patriotism is very different. To America ’s enemies he had a tough message: “Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred... for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you”. His commitment to his country’s military was manifest in his remarks later that night at the Commander-in Chief’s ball, when he said that of all his tasks he had no greater honor than to serve as commander-in-chief of the armed forces. This is far cry from the Chamberlain–like appeasement policies of the Sri Lankan Opposition and the pacifism of its civil society auxiliaries.

However, Obama’s patriotic resolve is different in character, from the aggressive patriotism that dominates Sri Lankan society. In his speech on Martin Luther King’s birthday, delivered at the Lincoln Memorial on the very eve of his presidential inauguration, President –elect Obama repeated the nature of his belief and the foundation of his hope:

“It is the same thing that gave me hope from the day we began this campaign for the presidency nearly two years ago; a belief that if we could just recognize ourselves in one another and bring everyone together - Democrats, Republicans, and Independents; Latino, Asian, and Native American; black and white, gay and straight, disabled and not - then not only would we restore hope and opportunity in places that yearned for both, but maybe, just maybe, we might perfect our union in the process. This is what I believed, but you made this belief real.”

Though 76.5% of the adult population of the United States defines itself as Christian, in his Inaugural Address President Obama reiterated to huge applause, and identified as wellspring of America’s success, that:

“For we know that our patchwork heritage is strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus — and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself…”

If as they say the sins of the fathers are visited on the children, this is not only truest of the founding fathers, but is true also in reverse, in that the virtues of the founding fathers are harvested by the children. Barack Obama and Martin Luther King were able to build upon the heritage of the Founding Fathers, working the contradiction that lay at the seams of the social contract: the belief that all men were created equal, and the fact many of the founding fathers were slave owners, and the republic coexisted with slavery. None of us can choose our fathers. Barack Obama is lucky that he is the political descendant of the Founding Fathers who were steeped in the ideals of the Enlightenment. This is not a matter of West vs. East. Indian politicians and intellectuals can also reach back to the enlightened ideals of the founding fathers, Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru and Ambedkar, and draw inspiration from the Nehruvian choices of secularism and quasi-federalism, as well as the Indian Constitution.

We Sri Lankans have no such heritage of a founding document that we can return to and draw upon, to correct our course. Yet, we do have something going for us which we can draw upon. We did get something right, and more correct than better endowed others. As veteran New York Times journalist turned scholar, Barbara Crossette, writing in The Nation earlier this month (Jan 6) wrote, “ Sri Lanka … was once the region's most progressive and democratic country… A reasonably egalitarian society with human development measures that still exceed India's--in better health care, near-universal education and literacy, protected rights for women and numerous other factors…”

We can return to what we were, enhance what is good about what we are, if only we are capable of two things: bringing this war to a swift, decisive and victorious conclusion, and rebuilding our society in a manner that preserves the best of our modern heritage, while eliminating those factors that brought this quarter century of bloody war upon us, distorting our profile and undermining those very achievements. For a society to sustain itself as progressive it has to be inclusionary not only of the poor and young of the majority ethnic group, but of all its constituent ethnic and religious communities.

Let there be no ambiguity. The LTTE has been the main obstacle to any progress and the main cause of our degeneration. The open economy of JR Jayewardene, the “growth with equity” multicultural model of Premadasa, the Blairite Third Way of Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, the free-market fundamentalism of the Tiger-friendly Ranil Wickremesinghe, all unraveled because of the war, and if someone is tempted to pin the entire or main blame on Sinhala chauvinism, it has to be recalled that the LTTE repeatedly returned to war despite the availability of serious reformist options such as the Indo-Lanka Accord, which the Tigers spurned and went on to murder the author-architect of.

The United States has emerged from the gloom, a few months before Sri Lanka has a chance of doing so. Sri Lanka ’s emergence from the tunnel of a bitter war will be closer to that of America ’s victories in its numerous wars than to the Obama victory. However, the Obama win is relevant to Sri Lanka in more than one way. We shall be closing out the war and building the peace in a new world-historical situation; not one characterized by the Bush administration’s ideology of the “global war on terror” (GWOT) with its Manichean worldview. With the failure of the policy of GWOT, there is a new paradigm that is taking wing. President Obama has made it plain that he disagrees completely with the argument that security requires the abandonment or suspension of the ideals of democratic societies such as the rule of law and individual rights and freedoms.

“As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our founding fathers, faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake...Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint. We are the keepers of this legacy”.

What do we do after we have won the war? The Bush administration made the mistake of not planning for what came after the military defeat of Saddam Hussein. We must think ahead. But we must also think correctly, in an enlightened and realistic manner. Do we follow the example of the victorious powers after World War 1, whose shortsighted and vengeful policies at the Treaty of Versailles resulted in the growth of Nazism among the defeated and humiliated Germans and led to a second more terrible World War? Or do we follow the example of the Allies after World War 11, whose generosity towards the defeated laid the foundations for the Western alliance and global prosperity? Or let us look at examples closer in time, and place. Do we attempt to imitate the Israelis and practice a policy of occupation, settlements and discrimination, triggering endless cycles of conflict, or do we follow the no less tough-minded but much smarter Russian leaders, who having had to smash the Chechen terrorist insurgency with untrammeled force, have since ensured a high degree of stability by devolving power to their Chechen ally the tough young Ramzan Kadyrov, and transferring enough economic autonomy to guarantee a surge of prosperity in Grozhny?

Already opinions are heard in favor of the most unenlightened of postwar options. These are recipes for continued tragedy, especially with Tamil Nadu at our back, Indian elections on the horizon and the Tamil Diaspora plugged into polities from the USA to South Africa , from Malaysia to Mauritius.

As President Obama said of cynics in his inaugural speech, so too of chauvinists -- majority and minority -- in Sri Lanka : what they “fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them”, globally. With the Obama victory, the current generation in United States is about to fulfill its highest potential. With the coming victory over the Tigers, Sri Lanka can do so too, provided we turn our backs on the local equivalent of the brand of patriotism and values of the outgoing Bush administration while heeding instead the call of Barack Obama. Sri Lanka , emerging from war, can build the peace only with the new spirit of the Obama age beneath its wings.

(These are the strictly personal views of the writer)

Wanni war and the tragic plight of trapped civilians

By D.B.S. Jeyaraj

Wise King Solomon when faced with the task of determining maternity of an infant had an innovative solution. He announced that the baby would be cut in half and given to both women claiming it.

KSTC0123.jpg

While the false claimant agreed, the actual mother was not ready to let her child die . She asked Solomon to hand over the infant to the other woman rather than let the child die. [click here to read the article in full ~ in DailyMirror.lk]

January 22, 2009

Defeating terrorism must not be at cost of civilian killings - MIA

by Mathangi "Maya" Arulpragasam

While there is no room in the world for terrorist organizations, their defeat cannot come at the expense of thousands of innocent civilian lives.

The greatest failing of the Bush administration’s “war on terror” is not its inability to meet its prime objectives (e.g. capturing Osama Bin Laden, eradicating the threat of WMDS in Iraq, and removing Al Qaeda from Afghanistan). Rather, it is that America has given credibility to the act and the notion of pursuing terrorists at all costs.

MIATC0122.jpg

[M.I.A. at the Siren Music Festival in July 2007]

The Bush administration has decided to ignore the very tenets of democracy (the U.S. constitution, Geneva convention, among others) in pursuit of winning the “war on terror.” In doing so, it sent a very clear message to the rest of the world: all bets are off where terrorism is involved.

Today, we can clearly see the ripple effect. In Sri Lanka, my home country, the Colombo government has massacred hundreds of thousands of civilians in order to eliminate the threat posed by a small yet defiant group widely known as the Tamil Tigers (also known as the LTTE or Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam). Make no mistake, the LTTE have engaged in reprehensible terrorist activities that have needlessly taken the lives of both civilians and heads of state. The LTTE’s use of child soldiers and suicide bombers is unconscionable, and has rightly been condemned by the international community. But now the eyeglass must turn to the Colombo government as the conflict enters its 25th year. The war has resulted in what many humanitarian groups are now calling genocide. And sadly, for the Tamil people, time is running out.

Just last month, the New York-based Genocide Prevention Project released a report that listed Sri Lanka among the top eight “red alert” countries currently experiencing genocide conflicts. And Human Rights Watch estimates that between 230,000 to 300,000 Tamil people have been trapped in the Vanni conflict zone by the government, denied food and basic living essentials.

Unfortunately, the truth of the matter is that no one knows how severe the crisis is because the Sri Lankan government has barred foreign media from reporting on the subject and severely limited the presence of humanitarian organizations. And worse, as demonstrated by the recent murder of Lasantha Wickramatunga, a Sri Lankan journalist critical of the war against the LTTE, those that question the government are putting their lives in jeopardy.

Yet other than the UN’s slap-on-the-wrist gesture of stripping Sri Lanka of its seat on the Human Rights Council in May of 2008, the World has remained silent about this emerging humanitarian crisis. What is even more disconcerting is that the global mainstream media has largely ignored the Tamil civilian causalities, and has actually praised the Sri Lankan government for “running an effective military campaign.” Additionally, somewhere along the way the media has managed to portray every Tamil as a Tamil Tiger, including myself.

Fortunately, this month brings a close to the Bush administration and its war on terror at all costs. President Barack Obama announced that he will issue an executive order on his first week in office to close the Guantanamo Bay prison facility – which has long become a symbol of the administration’s indifference to how it wins this war. But for the Tamil people in Sri Lanka, there is little hope that the Colombo government will change its policies.

We must be clear: acts of terrorism are deplorable and cannot be tolerated by any government, but to actively seek out the killing of innocent civilians, under the guise of fighting terror is absolutely indefensible. Governments must hold themselves to a higher standard.

Editor’s Note: Maya Arulpragasam (known as M.I.A.) is a music artist whose song “Paper Planes” received a 2009 Grammy nomination for Record of the Year. She was born in England to Tamil parents and fled the war in Sri Lanka after living there for ten years. She currently lives in the United States. [courtesy: CNN-AC 360]

After Killinochchi: Crouching Tigers Waiting To Pounce

by P.C.Vinoj Kumar

The dream of an independent homeland for Tamils in Sri Lanka, or Eelam, still burns bright in Tamil Nadu, despite the fall of Kilinochchi, the de-facto capital of the LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam) controlled territory in north Sri Lanka. In Tamil Nadu, a state where the LTTE continues to enjoy some political support despite it being a banned outfit in India, the LTTE's retreat from Kilinochchi is seen as a tactical move. On 2 January, 2009, Sri Lanka's hard-line President Mahinda Rajapakse announced the capture of Kilinochchi from the Tamil rebels, triggering celebrations in Colombo. Kilinochchi has come under government control after a gap of about 10 years.

Breaking the news on national television, Rajapakse, who has vowed to wipe out the LTTE and capture its chief, Vellupillai Prabhakaran, warned, "I am telling the LTTE for the last time to lay down their arms and surrender." Three days later, LTTE's political head B Nadesan, remained defiant. In an interview to the pro-LTTE website, Tamilnet, he pointed out that Kilinochchi had been captured more than once by the Lankan army earlier. "Similarly, we have also recaptured the town on earlier occasions. It is in Kilinochchi that the Sri Lankan forces have suffered historical debacles."

Pro-LTTE parties in Tamil Nadu, familiar with this history, are not perturbed at Kilinochchi's loss and regard the news of extermination of the LTTE as mere propaganda. They warn of a bloodbath for the Lankan forces, which are now spread out thinly across previously held LTTE territories. After being evicted from the Eastern Province, the Tigers also lost several strategic locations in Mannar district, west of Kilinochchi, before losing their capital.

Tamil Nationalist Movement leader P Nedumaran recalls the LTTE operation in the late 1990s to retrieve lost territories, including Kilinochchi. Codenamed Oyatha Alaigal (Unceasing Waves), the LTTE apparently conducted the operation in three phases from 1996. In the battle to retrieve Kilinochchi about 2,000 Lankan soldiers were killed in 1998. The operations began after the Tigers were dislodged from the Jaffna peninsula in 1996. At that time, the loss of Jaffna was considered a major blow to the LTTE and it was felt the Tigers would be decimated soon. History proved otherwise.

"The Tigers have shown repeatedly in the past that they can retrieve, in a matter of days, the territories that the Lankan army took months to capture," says Viduthalai Rajendran, general secretary of the Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam. This is the overall sentiment shared among pro-LTTE parties. Asked about recent setbacks for the LTTE, they say that the LTTE is preserving its men and arms to fight another day.

In the recent battle, the LTTE has kept its losses to a minimum. The Sri Lankan Defence Ministry said the army had lost 33 soldiers in the battle, among the highest it has admitted losing in the fight with the LTTE. The LTTE has been periodically releasing the photos of dead Lankan soldiers along with their names and identity cards and arms seized from the Lankan forces.

Kilinochchi is cited as a classic example of the LTTE strategy. After putting up days of stiff resistance at Paranthan, a small town located a few miles from Kilinochchi, the army virtually walked into a deserted Kilinochchi town. Mysteriously, there was barely any one around of the one lakh population. Tigers claim they had withdrawn deeper into the eastern Mullaithivu district. "It calls for supreme organising skills to pull off such a Herculean task of evacuating a whole town in a matter of days," says Agni Subramaniam, a human rights activist and an Eelam ana

An estimated 30,000 Lankan soldiers are protecting Kilinochchi, which the media has labelled a 'ghost town.' Journalists who visited the town have reported that there is no trace of life barring stray dogs and cows. A report in the local media said, "The city's 40-feetlong main water supply tank was reduced to pieces with powerful explosives. The electricity cables had been slashed across the city, and through the 8 km length of the town not many electric poles were seen." Rajendran, who had stayed in Kilinochchi as a 'state guest' of the Tigers in 2006 for about a month, says the town used to bustle with life. "They had built star hotels and restaurants. They had their own courts, and were running hospitals, and schools," he recalls.

However, even as the pro- LTTE parties are hopeful of an LTTE comeback, Indian security analysts like B Raman, a former RAW official, and Colonel R Hariharan, a former Military Intelligence official, feel that the possibilty of an LTTE recovery is remote. "The LTTE has bounced back in the past. But this time it may be difficult because the circumstances in the world are not what they used to be," says Hariharan. He points out that the LTTE, which has a modern weapons system, procures its arms from countries like Ukraine, Cambodia and North Korea. "The marine sea routes through which their arms are smuggled in are no longer porous. It will be difficult for the LTTE to ensure a steady supply of arms to continue its fight," he says.

Supplies from the Tamil Nadu coast have virtually stopped. The DMK Government, which is constantly under pressure from the Centre to monitor the coast so as to prevent the infiltration of LTTE cadres, has strengthen coastal security. The Indian Navy and Coast Guard have also increased patrolling in the previously porous region.

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi in his message at the Chief Ministers' Conference in New Delhi on 6 January, urged the Prime Minister to "treat the lengthy, porous border of Tamil Nadu along the east coast on par with the international borders in the north, east and west, and increase the presence of central forces, the Coast Guard and the Navy."

The Q Branch, a special wing of the State Police which deals with militant groups, is closely monitoring the LTTE. A senior official told TEHELKA that the LTTE no longer uses the Indian coast to smuggle arms. However, he reveals that there have been seizures of satellite phones, iron balls, and computer spare parts meant for Sri Lanka. "We have arrested about 279 people in the last three years in connection with these seizures," he said. Ten of them were allegedly LTTE men, most were smugglers and had no ideological links with any of the Tamil groups or the LTTE, the official said. The LTTE has started using the Mullaithivu coast on its eastern borders for landing arms, most of which arrive via the South East Asian sea route.

For Prabhakaran, the year ahead will be crucial. The LTTE is banking on a US regime under Barack Obama, who is taking office as US president on January 20, to rein in or prevent Rajapakse from exterminating the Tamils in Sri Lanka on the pretext of a war. It remains to be seen whether Obama's description of the Eelam conflict as a 'vicious civil war' and his designate secretary of state Hillary Clinton's perceived softness towards the Tamil minorities will herald a softening in US policy towards the besieged Tigers.

COURTESY: TEHELKA

Six former US Ambassadors write to President about Lasantha’s killing

Six former US Ambassadors to Sri Lanka have expressed concern over the deteriorating situation in the country following the murder of The Sunday Leader Editor Lasantha Wickrematunge.

Marion Creekmore.jpgTeresita Schaffer.jpgPeter Burleigh.JPGShaun Donnelly.jpg

[L to R: Ambassadors Marion Creekmore, Teresita Schaffer, Peter Burleigh and Shaun Donnelly]

The ambassadors, Marion Creekmore (1989-92), Teresita Schaffer (1992-95), A. Peter Burleigh (1995-97), Shaun Donnelly (1997-2000), Ashley Wills (2000-03) and Jeffrey Lunstead (2003-06), while accepting that the government was engaged in a necessary fight against terrorism, in a stinging letter to President Mahinda Rajapakse in their personal capacities have said that the foundations of democracy had come under assault following the killing of Wickrematunge.

Ashley Wills.jpgJeffrey Lunstead.jpg

[L to R: Ambassadors Ashley Wills and Jeffrey Lunstead]

Following is the full letter:

"We are all former United States Ambassadors to Sri Lanka, but we are writing in our personal capacities. Our service in Sri Lanka stretches for over 15 years, and we have seen good times and hard times in the country. We all have great respect and affection for Sri Lanka and its people. We have known you at different points in your career, and we all acknowledge your love for your country and your desire to see it at peace.

"We have all, at different times and in different ways, made it clear that we believed the goals and tactics of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam were unacceptable, and that the Government of Sri Lanka was engaged in a difficult but necessary fight against terrorism. We have all supported and argued for United States assistance to Sri Lanka in that struggle.

"It is for all of these reasons that we are now so upset by developments in Sri Lanka, the most recent of which was the murder of The Sunday Leader Editor Lasantha Wickrematunge. We fear that, even as Sri Lanka is enjoying military progress against the LTTE, the foundations of democracy in the country are under assault.

"The killing of Wickrematunge has prompted this letter, but there have been many previous incidents in which the rights of individuals and the media have been violated.

"Mr. President, we speak frankly because in our dealings with you we have always found you to have an open mind and to respect the truth. Some have suggested that these events have been carried out not by elements of the government, but by other forces hoping to embarrass the government.

"We do not find such arguments credible. We are familiar with your history as a defender of those whose rights were threatened by the government. We assume, therefore, that if government forces are carrying out these acts, they are acting without your permission and knowledge. We believe it is imperative that these actions stop, and that those who have carried them out be prosecuted.

"Fighting an unconventional war against a terrorist enemy is a difficult task, and the sad truth is that it almost always results in some brutal and illegal acts. This is as true of our country as it is of Sri Lanka. The important thing is that the country’s leadership not condone these acts, and that an atmosphere is set from the top that they will not be accepted, and that those who commit them will be held to account.

"We urge you to take steps to reestablish accountability and the rule of law in Sri Lanka. Investigations have been promised before but have been futile. At times government officials have not appeared diligent, as happened in the investigation of the killing of NGO workers assisted by the International Eminent Persons Group.

‘It is crucial that an investigation now not follow that same fruitless path. It must also be made clear to members of the security forces that discipline will be enforced and violators will be brought to justice. Only you can provide the leadership and clear direction that will make this happen. We have seen before the positive results that such leadership can have, for example, when the decision to issue receipts for all detained persons dramatically reduced the number of disappearances.

"Sri Lanka has gone through difficult times, but its democratic system has always persevered. Neither the LTTE nor assaults by other radical forces have been able to destroy it. It would be a tragedy if it were destroyed now, not from without, but from within.

"We intend to make this letter public after you have received it."

Human Rights Watch writes to Mahinda about illegal detention of three Tamil Journalists

JSTTC0122.jpgThe New York based Human Rights Watch has written to President Mahinda Rajapakse about the "illegal" detention of three Tamil journalists in Sri Lanka. The full text of the letter is given below:

January 22, 2009

Hon. Mahinda Rajapakse
President of Sri Lanka
‘Temple Trees’
Colombo 3
Sri Lanka

Via facsimile: +94 11 2446657

Dear President Rajapakse,

Human Rights Watch is writing this open letter to urge your government to drop all charges and unconditionally release journalist J.S. Tissainayagam and publisher V. Jasiharan and his wife V. Valamathy, who have been in detention since March 2008

J.S. Tissainayagam, an ethnic Tamil columnist with the Sunday Times newspaper and editor of the Outreach website, was arrested by the police Terrorist Investigation Division (TID) on March 7, 2008. The previous day the TID had arrested V. Jasiharan, the owner of E-Kwality press, and his wife V. Valamathy. Tissainayagam and Jasiharan are co-directors of the company Outreach Multimedia.

On August 25, Tissainayagam was charged under the Emergency Regulations and the Prevention of Terrorism Act for editing, printing and publishing the North Eastern Monthly magazine, of which he was previously an editor, and for aiding and abetting terrorist organisations through raising money for the magazine.

The indictment quotes the following passages from the North Eastern Monthly as grounds for charging Tissainayagam:

1. In a July 2006 editorial, under the headline, "Providing security to Tamils now will define northeastern politics of the future," Tissainayagam wrote: "It is fairly obvious that the government is not going to offer them any protection. In fact it is the state security forces that are the main perpetrator of the killings."

2. The charges against Tissainayagam also include part of a November 2006 article on the military offensive in Vaharai, in the east, which said, "Such offensives against the civilians are accompanied by attempts to starve the population by refusing them food as well as medicines and fuel, with the hope of driving out the people of Vaharai and depopulating it. As this story is being written, Vaharai is being subject to intense shelling and aerial bombardment."

Your government’s decision to arrest and prosecute Tissainayagam violates his fundamental right to freedom of expression under international law. While international law permits some restrictions on freedom of expression for reasons of national security, such restrictions may not be used to justify far-reaching restrictions on critics of the government.

The Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information (U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1996/39 (1996)), provide in principle 7 that “the peaceful exercise of the right to freedom of expression shall not be considered a threat to national security or subjected to any restrictions or penalties.” Expression which shall not constitute a threat to national security includes: criticism of the government, its agencies, and public officials; objections to a particular conflict; or expression communicating information about alleged violations of international human rights or international humanitarian law.

As a former human rights activist, you brought international attention on the issue of enforced disappearances and would have vociferously opposed anyone being prosecuted for peaceful comments and criticism of the government.

We fear the real motive behind jailing and prosecuting Tissainayagam is to punish him for his activities as a journalist, and to intimidate other critical media in Sri Lanka.

The handling of the case has also violated Tissainayagam’s fundamental rights to due process and a fair trial under international law. We discuss those issues below.

Perhaps the most glaring of these irregularities was that Tissainayagam’s indictment was made available to the Secretary to the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights, Rajiva Wijesinha, before being registered in the relevant court and the indictment proceedings. In a letter dated August 12, 2008, Wijesinha wrote to Human Rights Watch that “Mr Tissainayagam was arrested because of suspicions regarding connections to the LTTE, a terrorist organization which as you are aware is banned in several countries.” He wrote that Tissainayagam continued to have contacts with the LTTE and that after time-consuming investigations (during which Tissainayagam was detained for over 150 days), he had been charged for publications which Wijesinha termed “questionable.” Wijesinha quoted a passage from one of Tissainayagam’s articles written in 2006, which he said was part of the indictment.

The critical issue here is that on August 12 Wijesinha referred to an indictment which was only registered with the High Court of Colombo on August 13. Both Tissainayagam and his lawyer were unaware of the charges against them until Wijesinha’s statement was made public.

We would like to know why Wijesinha had access to the indictment before it was filed. He has no role in criminal investigations or prosecutions. This violates Tissainayagam’s right to due process and demonstrates that the political authorities intervened inappropriately in his case.

We would also like to know why neither the accused nor his lawyer saw the indictment until August 25. This is also a serious failure of due process.

There have been other instances where established legal procedures and due process have not been followed in the case.

1. The authorities did not inform Tissainayagam’s family of his arrest. Tissainayagam was arrested on March 7, yet his family only had confirmation of his arrest when the TID arrived with him to search his house in the early hours of March 8. This is in violation of Sri Lankan Supreme Court directives on arrests, which require that the family has to be informed immediately. In a country where enforced disappearances remain a major problem, the failure to notify a family of an individual’s arrest can result in significant distress.

2. The state counsel did not produce a detention order for Tissainayagam on March 27, 2008 in the Supreme Court despite being given a week’s notice by the Supreme Court to do so.

3. Since his arrest, Tissainayagam has not had adequate access to counsel. Despite seeking permission to see Tissainayagam on March 10, his lawyer did not receive permission to see him until March 21, four days after a Fundamental Rights Case was filed. International law obligates states to permit persons to have access to legal counsel of their choosing immediately upon detention.

4. Police officers have been present during Tissainayagam’s discussions with his lawyers, violating his right to communicate and consult with a lawyer in full confidentiality. One of the police officers present during the consultations has been cited as a respondent in the Fundamental Rights Case filed. Tissainayagam’s lawyers filed a complaint with the Supreme Court on May 22, yet this practice continued.

5. Tissainayagam was arrested on March 7, 2008. He was produced in the magistrate’s chambers on April 1 and the magistrate ordered that he be produced again on May 12. Despite repeated orders that Tissainayagam be produced before the magistrate's court, the TID refused to produce him on six different dates, only producing him on May 27.

6. On June 5 Tissainayagam’s detention order lapsed. The TID failed to follow Sri Lankan procedural guidelines by either submitting a detention order the following day or producing Tissainayagam in court. The TID flouted the magistrate’s order to produce Tissainayagam in court the same day, producing a fresh detention order from the Defense Secretary instead.

7. On December 23, the Sri Lankan Ministry of Defense published a statement on the case on its website “Background: Thissanayagam Case and Others,” http://www.defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20081222_01 which quoted parts of Tissainayagam’s confession interspersed with comments about the North Eastern Monthly magazine. The case is currently sub judice and the defense ministry article calls Tissainayagam a “terrorist” even as the court is still hearing the matter. The LTTE is not mentioned in Tissainayagam’s indictment but the defense ministry article claims as fact that the North Eastern Monthly magazine was controlled by the LTTE. This has serious implications for the fundamental fair trial right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty.

On August 25, 2008, the trial against Tissainayagam began in Colombo. The government sought to admit as evidence a purported confession made by Tissainayagam while in government custody. On December 5, the High Court ruled Tissainayagam's confession to be voluntary and therefore admissible as evidence. However, the order detailing the reasons why Tissainayagam's confession was voluntary was not made available to his lawyers despite a motion from the lawyers being tendered immediately.

On December 18, the High Court judge stated that the case record is kept under "lock and key" but ordered that the order be made available to the lawyers immediately. However, when the trial resumed on January 13, the order had not been made available to them. The lawyers requested the order again in open court, which was finally made available to them on the afternoon of January 19. The prosecution was provided the order before January 13.
The glaring violations of due process and the right to a fair trial in the Tissainayagam case create the wide impression in Sri Lanka and abroad, that his prosecution is part of a campaign of repression targeting independent media.

Press freedom is a fundamental component of any functioning democracy. Fighting terrorism should not become an excuse for jailing peaceful critics of the government. In light of the recent murder of journalist Lasantha Wickremetunga and the attack on Maharaja Television, now is the time for your government to demonstrate its commitment to freedom of expression and the protection of journalists instead of conducting politically motivated prosecutions.

Real leadership is needed if you are to convince Sri Lankans and the world that you and your government genuinely support press freedom. An important step would be to drop charges against J.S. Tissainayagam, V. Jasiharan and V. Valamathy.

Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to your response.

Yours truly,

Brad Adams
Director, Asia Division

Cc: HE Mr. H.M.G.S. Palihakkara; HE Mr. Jaliya Wickramasuriya; HE Mr. Dayan Jayatilleke; HE Mr. N.A.C. Nihal de Silva Jayasinghe

Over 100 civilians killed and 300 injured says Mullaitheevu Government Agent

By C. Bryson Hull

Nearly 100 civilians have been killed in artillery exchanges between Sri Lanka's military and Tamil Tigers since the weekend, a top government official working in the area controlled by the rebels said on Thursday.

The report of casualties came on a day the United Nations said the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) had violated international law by stopping its local staff and their families from leaving the war zone in an aid convoy.

twchil3a.jpg

[Injured child in Vanni]

That echoed earlier complaints from human rights watchdogs that said the separatist rebels had forced civilians to stay in the war zone as human shields and forced conscripts. The rebels, on U.S., E.U. and Indian terrorist lists, deny that.

Sri Lanka's military has boxed the LTTE into an area of less than 400 square km after the most successful campaign so far in the 25-year war and is aiming to deliver a final blow to the last rebel redoubt, the port of Mullaitivu.

Aid agencies have warned that about 230,000 refugees are trapped and at risk of being caught in the crossfire.

"Around 30 people died in the morning today. Personally I saw that nearly 100 people have died from Saturday up to today. More than 300 have been injured," Mullaittivu District Government Agent Emelda Sukumar told Reuters by phone.

Getting independent confirmation of casualties in the war zone is nearly impossible.
Sukumar, who spoke from Mullaittivu, is in charge of government services including humanitarian aid in the rebel area.

The national government pays her salary, but she is under the LTTE's watch and relies on them for her safety. For that reason, the government has often said its agents are under duress and liable to publicly give a version of events favourable to the LTTE.

'CANNOT ESCAPE'

Sukumar said the army ceased fire after her office got in touch with them and the Red Cross, which arranged a convoy to ferry 46 sick and wounded people from a hospital near Mullaittivu to a government hospital in Vavuniya, far from the battle.

"When people occupy particular places, the LTTE send shells from that area, and then army also targets the same area," she said. "So people cannot escape from the shelling."
The military on Wednesday announced a 32 sq km safe zone near Mullaittivu and dropped leaflets urging civilians to go there.

On Thursday, pro-rebel website www.TamilNet.com reported that shelling had killed 66 civilians and wounded 176 in the past 60 hours in areas including the safe zone and the hospital.

Military spokesman Brigadier Udaya Nanayakkara denied that.

"Today we stopped firing and took 46 patients from that hospital through the Red Cross, so that kind of humanitarian operation is underway. We didn't fire into the safe zone because we wanted civilians to come," Nanayakkara said.

The United Nations in a statement said it had "issued its strongest possible protest to the LTTE for their refusal to allow U.N. national staff and dependents" to leave the war zone in a convoy on Thursday.

"The LTTE's denial of safe passage is a clear abrogation of their obligations under international humanitarian law," it said.

The LTTE could not be reached for comment.

The LTTE say they are fighting to create an independent state for minority Tamils, many of whom complain of mistreatment by successive governments since the Sinhalese ethnic majority took over at independence from Britain in 1948.

COURTESY:REUTERS

Britain endorses war on LTTE while emphasizing human rights and political solution

The full text of the written Ministerial Statement by the Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs on Sri Lanka, issued on 21 January 2009, follows:

The Government has long standing concerns with the promotion of peace in Sri Lanka, where the conflict has claimed at least 70,000 lives during the past 26 years. We are now at an important moment.

Since its abrogation in January 2008 of the 2002 Ceasefire Agreement, the Sri Lankan government has embarked on a policy of militarily defeating the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). In recent months the government has made significant military gains, including the capture of Kilinochchi, the former administrative centre of the LTTE in the north, and the capture of remaining rebel territory in the Jaffna Peninsula. These gains make progress on a political solution even more urgent. The LTTE is a proscribed terrorist organisation with no democratic mandate to represent the Tamil people. It is responsible for a terrorist campaign that has targeted innocent civilians across all communities in Sri Lanka over the past three decades.

Thousands of lives have been lost since the renewal of open hostilities in 2006. We recognise the government of Sri Lanka’s need to root out terrorism. It also has a responsibility to safeguard the rights of all its citizens and adequately to address their political concerns. Our consistent position remains that for peace to be sustainable, an inclusive political process that takes fully into account the legitimate concerns of all Sri Lankan communities - Sinhalese, Tamil and Muslim - is essential. As my Rt. Hon Friend the Prime Minister has said, we must see an end to the conflict and new drive for a lasting political solution. We continue to engage with all political parties across all communities in Sri Lanka to support progress in this direction.

We are deeply concerned by the humanitarian situation in Sri Lanka and the growing number of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs). My Rt. Hon Friend the Prime minister spoke about this issue with President Rajapakse when they met last September and we continue to raise our concern at senior levels. The UN estimates that 200,000-300,000 IDPs remain in the conflict area. Although there have been convoys providing basic humanitarian assistance, there are credible reports that these supplies are inadequate. The military gains by the Sri Lankan armed forces have resulted in these IDPs being squeezed into an ever-decreasing space. Further deterioration in the situation would mean acute humanitarian need and distress.

Following on from a Department for International Development (DFID) mission in September 2008, we will be sending a DFID humanitarian expert in the coming weeks to try to assess the situation and to report on the distribution of £2.5 million in humanitarian funding that we have committed to assist IDPs in northern Sri Lanka. In coordination with international organisations on the ground, we have urged all parties to abide by their obligations under international humanitarian law, in particular the need to ensure the safety of civilians, to allow their free movement and to enhance access for humanitarian agencies to facilitate the delivery of adequate supplies of humanitarian aid. Safe passage for civilians wanting to escape the hostilities should be guaranteed by all parties and safe humanitarian space provided for them. We believe that a full independent assessment of the IDPs’ humanitarian needs is essential. Such an assessment would be a powerful demonstration that everything that can be done is being done to support these vulnerable people. We will continue to press on these matters.

Recent weeks have seen a considerable number of high profile attacks on media freedom in Sri Lanka. We condemn such brazen attacks. Of particular concern was the murder on 8 January of the Chief Editor of the Sunday Leader newspaper, Lasantha Wickrematunge. The Sri Lankan authorities have a duty to take prompt action to ensure a thorough and independent investigation is carried out. Those responsible must be held to account. The lack of progress in securing convictions for such cases indicates that urgent action is needed.

There continue to be reports of abductions, disappearances and acts of violence and intimidation in Sri Lanka. Without strong mechanisms for independent human rights reporting, it is difficult to assess the true scope of the problem. We consistently call upon the government of Sri Lanka to take decisive action to tackle human rights abuses, including by taking action against those responsible for violations. Creating an environment in which people from all communities in Sri Lanka live without fear is essential to creating the conditions for a sustainable end to the conflict. The recent commitments by militias on release of child soldiers and disarmament following our lobbying are welcome steps that need to be followed through.

My Rt. Hon. Friend the Prime Minister has written to President Rajapakse to express our concerns.

TNA wants International community to prevail on Colombo to end war

The Tamil National Alliance has issued a statement calling upon the International community to prevail upon the Sri Lankan government to end the on going war.

Full text of the press statement follows:

URGENT PRESS RELEASE – TNA CALLS FOR IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE AND TALKS:

The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) wishes to bring to the urgent attention of the international community the current dire situation facing the Tamil civilian population in Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) administered areas. Currently there are over 360,000 IDPs out of a total population of nearly 500,000 people in LTTE controlled areas. This entire population is living within an area of about 400 square kilometers.

In addition to ordering all United Nations and other humanitarian NGOs out of LTTE administered areas since September 2008, the Sri Lankan State has also imposed stringent economic, medical and food embargoes resulting in the severe lack of basic items required by the civilians.

In addition to this already critical condition, due to the targeted bombing campaigns by the Sri Lankan Armed Forces on IDP camps and other public buildings that could provide shelter, IDPs have been forced to seek refuge under trees, on the roads, and even in the jungles to avoid being killed. Most of these areas are flooded due to the recent monsoon rains.

Tamil civilians including children and infants have been killed or grievously injured in substantial numbers. Their houses, farms crops and plantations have been destroyed. Their means of livelihood have been destroyed and they have been rendered destitute. In the last 20 days alone 66 civilians have been killed and 263 civilians have been grievously injured.

This military campaign is taking place whilst the Sri Lankan State has been unwilling to take any meaningful steps in keeping with the mandates given by the overwhelming majority of the Tamil people to the TNA at the last two consecutive general elections. This only demonstrates that the Sri Lankan State is not committed to an acceptable political solution to the Tamil National Question. This further demonstrates the reality that the Sri Lankan State is only committed to a military solution.

It is the considered view of the TNA that the Sri Lankan State is prosecuting the current war in pursuit of an ideology, namely the assertion of Sinhala Buddhist supremacist nationalism, and in order to achieve that objective a process of Genocide of the Tamil people is in progress. The inhuman conditions and the daily killings to which the Tamil civilians in LTTE controlled areas are being subjected to are only the more obvious elements of this process.

Under these circumstances the TNA urgently appeals to the international community to prevail upon the Sri Lankan State to bring the war to an immediate end. The TNA also calls upon the international community to use its good offices to bring the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE to the negotiating table.

PARLIAMENTARY GROUP
TAMIL NATIONAL ALLIANCE

January 21, 2009

Celebrating war victories as those of majority community is warped idea of patriotism

By Shakuntala Perera

Long grown to the idea of patriotism being the refuge of scoundrels, it was indeed refreshing to hear Mr. Barak Obama actually extolling its virtues on Tuesday night. Delivering his inaugural address to the nation as its 44th President, he brought new meaning to the word and where it stands in the new world order.

“Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends — honesty and hard work, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism — these things are old. These things are true,“ he stressed.

He noted that these virtues were in fact the quiet force of progress throughout American history. Seeking to ‘return to these truths’, he opined that what was required of ‘us now is a new era of responsibility — a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation and the world.

He maintained that these duties must not be accepted ‘grudgingly’ but rather ‘seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task.

‘This is the price and the promise of citizenship’, he stressed. Apart from successfully inspiring a nation standing financially and morally bankrupt he possibly alerted the nation towards the duties it needed fulfill. Duties, that countries like Sri Lanka; long on the US loan schemes had been denied recognition, drawn in a quagmire of politically drawn agendas.

The post Independent generations of Sri Lanka had fast been denied their right to patriotism, drawn apart by a varied color and hue. They grew up challenging the idea of loving your country, confused at the idea of having any duties towards its progress. The ensuing alienation of minority communities was then, not such a surprise. Alarmingly, these communities were being denied the satisfaction of carrying out their rightful duties towards their motherland.

This in effect is why the historic war victories of Sri Lankan security forces are fast being celebrated as those of the majority community. It is such warped ideas of patriotism that is denying the Tamil people the pleasures of witnessing the defeat of their biggest enemy. No one is more responsible for the elimination of the intellectual moderate Tamil citizens than Prabhakaran.

No organization is more at fault for denying this community the dignity with which to have a normal life, than the LTTE. And no one is more responsible for the drudgery of a life in a refugee camp or stunting its cultural and intellectual growth as a community with a unique identity as the LTTE. The fears that every mother, denied her child in the armed cadres of the LTTE, or forced into the villages of Mullaitivu today as a human shield of the LTTE, would find space to enjoy the victories of the security forces against the ruthless LTTE, if petty politics would not be in the way.

Every successive post independent government must hold responsibility for the alienation every minority community feels today. They are equally responsible for the guilt that many within the majority community feel enjoying the victories in the battle field. From the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna to the Patriotic National Movement which has taken patriotism under its custody must be held responsible for denying the minority communities their fair share of the celebrations.

In their attempts to cultivate its vote base, such parties are making the sacrifices of our valiant soldiers to be purely those of a Sinhala Buddhist army. Such methods apart from proving LTTE claims of discrimination right, will pose a greater threat towards building a nation strengthened by the virtues of patriotism.

The UNP in its weak attempt to lure the minority communities thus alienated into its voter fold is no less responsible. In fact the UNP long abandoning its duties as a responsible Opposition, need necessarily to be mindful of the long term consequences of fishing in such dangerous waters, for the country.

And no leader is more responsible for treating patriotism as a dirty word than Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe, in his continuous attempts to play politics with the aspirations of the marginalized. And as Mr. Wickremesinghe threatens to destabilize the country further by his no-confidence motions, and nonsensical political agendas one needs to remind him what makes people like Barak Obama leaders. It is not in refusing one’s people the pride of a nation or bringing all communities together as one that both make leaders but also takes countries towards progress.

The UNP must wake up to this sad reality blocking its path. As long as the UNP attempts to derive strength from measures threatening the country’s sovereignty it will find it denied the base it is in crying need of. The real lessons of patriotism are not very hard to learn- neither are their failures.

Sinhala educated parliamentarians cannot even speak Sinhala

by Jayatissa Perera

The great Sinhala scholar Ediriweera Saratchandra used to say that those who knew only Sinhala did not know even Sinhala. Hence the verse "Demala Saku Magadha Nohasala Sathata Dhadha/Sihala basin sekevin Kiyami padhabendha" or to those who are uneducated in Tamil, Sanskrit, Pali, I shall in brief, versify in Sinhala.

But when in 1956 we had the Sinhala only policy the boys and girls in our schools began to think of Sinhala only and nothing else. Though our Marxists like NM at first opposed the Sinhala only idea they themselves had no alternative but to accept it in order to prevent themselves from being carried away by the language tsunami of the pancha maha balavegaya, the monks, vedamahattayas, Iskola Mahattayas, Kamkaru Sahodarayas and goviralas. Today, to use the words of another great scholar, Ivor Jennings, we are in a ‘cultural desert’.

To know what ignoramuses were born after the Sinhala only policy switch on to Swarnavahini on a Sunday at 7.30 p.m. and watch a man in tie and coat trying to educate a set of mutton-heads to speak English!

A Sri Lankan friend of mine, an old Royalist of the good old days when the medium of instruction was the Queen’s English, who is now educating his children in England, asked me why Sri Lankan parliamentarians lacked intelligent humour.

He mentioned how speakers in English possessed that quality in old Ceylon when schoolchildren were compulsorily taken to the supreme legislature as a part of their education. In the Indian parliament too, one qualification for an MP, was his ability to use language to create laughter in the House. That was when English was still the language of choice.

He said how on 20 September, 1980, the well known Piloo Mody was then in the Opposition presenting his critical views on a government proposal. The ruling party was the Congress (I) and they wondered how long they would have to listen to his caustic words. Sitaram Kesari from the government benches who had a reputation for boldness, asked Mody to refrain from ‘hooting.’ Mody retorted, "It is better than barking."

Sitaram Kesari sensed that he had received more than he could swallow. Yet, he realised that he could gain a point over Mody by seeking the intervention of the Speaker as the use of the word ‘barking’ was unparliamentary. The Speaker agreed to give his ruling after referring to his dictionary. Mody, who was still on his feet, saw an opening for yet another barb. He added, "Mr. Speaker, while you are at it, please also pronounce whether ‘braying’ is allowed."

Whenever I watch parliamentary debates telecast in Sri Lanka, I feel sad for our MPs who, as Ediriweera Saratchandra remarked, speak only Sinhalese and that too without any intelligent humour at all, because they don’t seem to know even Sinhala.

January 20, 2009

Prabakaran Is Presumably Fighting His Last battle In Conventional warfare.

by Col.R.Hariharan

The battle being waged by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to defend Mullathivu in the face of the Sri Lanka security forces’ onslaught may well be the last conventional military operation by Tamil insurgent leader Velupillai Prabakaran in the two-year-long “Eelam War IV.” Mullathivu is the LTTE’s last bastion, what is left from an original domain of nearly nine districts it had ruled for over a decade. The security forces are building up a four to six division-strong force for what they promise to be the closing call on the LTTE.

After the fall of Kilinochchi and Elephant Pass successively during the early part of January, the LTTE lost control of the Kandy-Jaffna A9 road, and with it lost the ability to have an impact on the lives of most of the people of the Northern Province. The LTTE had dominated the road, considered to be the lifeline for Jaffna, a city that had once flourished as a thriving business hub next only to Colombo. After driving out the LTTE from the A9, the security forces were focussing on three aspects — consolidating their hold on the highway by eliminating LTTE defences east of it, opening the axes of offensive to Mullathivu, and getting ready for a final offensive on Mullathivu.

During the first half of the month, the security forces eliminated the line of LTTE defences along the old Kandy-Jaffna road running parallel to the A9 to its east. With the clearing of the defences aligned from Iranamadu in the south to Vaddakachi and Dharmapuram in the north, the forces marginalised the LTTE’s capability to interfere with the A9. So the forces may well keep up the promise to open the road within a month for civilian traffic, thus providing much needed relief to Jaffna’s beleaguered citizens. Though the LTTE had stoutly defended its strong points such as Iranamadu and Dharmapuram, its intention was probably only to delay the start of the offensive on Mullathivu.

During these operations, the forces captured the LTTE’s main airstrip east of the Iranamadu tank on January 15. This was an important airstrip used by the tiny LTTE air wing for its plucky operations that caused more psychological impact than operational damage. It was built in a clearing of heavy undergrowth, cleverly using the old Kandy-Jaffna road passing through the area. The 1.5-km long and 40-metre wide airstrip was central to a complex of two smaller airstrips located to the north and south of the Iranamadu tank. These were captured in earlier months. Five days earlier, the security forces had captured another battle-ready airstrip west of Mullathivu.

The six LTTE airstrips that have been captured so far go to show the enormous effort the insurgents had put into developing their air capability. Undoubtedly, the ceasefire period during the peace process was put to build up the ground infrastructure for air operations. These are a testimony not only to the LTTE’s technical capability but its relentless effort to build military capability regardless of peace parleys. Significantly, none of the two light aircraft used by it earlier for raids have been found. Presumably they were dismantled and mothballed in hideouts as the operational conditions and the active air and ground surveillance would have made it difficult to fly them out of harm’s way.

Mullathivu town, which is the focal point of the current offensive, is located on a narrow strip on the eastern coast of the Northern Province, flanked by the sea on the east and the Nanthikadal lagoon on the west. Its defence perimeter is made up of a complex of LTTE positions strung up as a crescent along the western edge of the lagoon starting from Puthukkudiyiruppu in the north to Tanniyuttu on the Mankulam-Mullathivu A34 road.

The security forces’ battle plans are built on three broad fronts. 55 Division coming from Jaffna along the northwest has blocked the escape routes through Chundikulam, a key Sea Tiger base. From the same direction, 58 Division is advancing along the A35 road fighting a series of delaying positions. From the west, 57 Division is playing a containing role with the LTTE cadres boxed in the jungles between Iranamadu tank and Mullathivu. The main offensive is being built up from the south with three task forces — which are formations smaller than divisions — and 59 Division. The task forces are combing the jungles while 59 Division is poised for the assault.

With such a large force confronting them, the LTTE cadres defending Mullathivu are facing a situation that is not dissimilar to what they faced during their defence of Kilinochchi, which crumbled after the government forces broke through the perimeter defences. Mullathivu might face the same fate with the final assault going through as a walk-in into a ghost town.

Humanitarian agencies have warned of an impending human tragedy with about 3.5 lakh civilians trapped in the battle zone, and the LTTE is being accused of using them as a cover. However, civilians have started flowing into the area controlled by the security forces in their hundreds, indicating that the LTTE is no more able to exercise tight control over them.

Thus, what is possibly Prabakaran’s last battle is likely to leave him in a position similar to what he was in 1987 — mauled badly and trying to cut his losses and live to fight another day. And, as earlier, the security forces are at his heels to catch or kill him, although the army commander, Lt. General Sarath Fonseka, says the Tiger chief might have fled the island for a safer refuge. After losing the precious lives 24,000 of his followers in nearly three decades of war, Prabakaran is still where he was to pursue his dream of a Tamil Eelam. (courtesy: The Hindu)

(Colonel (retd) R. Hariharan served as head of intelligence with the Indian Peace Keeping Force in Sri Lanka during 1987-1990. E-mail: colhari@yahoo.com )

Lasantha Assassination: Significance beyond who did it and why

by Izeth Hussain

"The cure for the ills of democracy is more democracy." – H.L.Mencken

I never met Lasantha Wickrematunge and here I am referring to him familiarly as "Lasantha", that is to say as if he were a lost friend of mine. My purpose is to give the name "Lasantha" iconic status, a household name familiar to everyone, a name that stands for the rare and exemplary courage without a modicum of which democracy cannot survive in Sri Lanka. He seemed an unlikely person to be cast in so heroic a role, with that cherubic face of his stuck on a podgy body.

Furthermore, he was obviously enormously talented and talented in a multi-faceted way so that he could have easily shone as journalist, businessman, politician, and led the life of the privileged upper class of Sri Lanka. Instead he chose to fight the good fight as our grand servitor of democracy, displaying a courageousness that was unparalleled among Sri Lankans of his class and background. He deserves iconic status.

We must see him for what he was in the perspective of democracy. Its prerequisite is the holding of free and fair elections. One problem is that after being elected democratically a government can come to have dictatorial powers. Rousseau wrote in the eighteenth century that the English people were free on the day of the elections, after which they became slaves of the government until the next elections. It was a jaundiced view of British democracy, coloured by Rousseau’s Swiss background which led to a predilection for participatory as opposed to representative democracy. He failed to recognize therefore that British democracy with its rotten boroughs and limited franchise, and all its other defects, was alive and vigorously kicking because it was an organic growth of the British political culture, something shaped by centuries of struggle. But Rousseau’s observation could be apposite to countries where democracy is a transplant with shallow or no roots at all. It was certainly apposite to the kind of democracy we had in Sri Lanka for many years after 1977.

Where Rousseau went really wrong was in failing to grasp that there is much more to democracy than the periodic holding of free and fair elections. It came to be recognized in the eighteenth century that one of the requisites for democracy was the separation of powers, that is to say the powers of the legislature, the judiciary, and the executive, which stood in the way of the democratically elected government becoming despotic. Later it came to be recognized that a free press was another requisite, and later still the factor of an active civil society was added to the list. I believe that at the core of it all is the democratic will of the people to be free – shown in a willingness to stand up for themselves and for each other against state power – without which there will be no active civil society, no free press, no meaningful separation of powers, and no democracy worth the name. That will was there among the British people in the eighteenth century and earlier. It can be seen as part of British national identity as central to it is the notion of the free-born Englishman, the notion that Britons never will be slaves.

That democratic will was not there among the Sri Lankan people, as shown by the ease with which democracy was destroyed after 1977 by the Jayawardena dictatorship. Sometime afterwards our late and great journalist Mervyn de Silva, who had an exceptionally acute understanding of the politics of our time, took to quoting the famous poem of Pastor Niemoller. It has been much in vogue in recent times, and I see that it has been quoted more than once in the obituary tributes to Lasantha. I myself will quote it here as it is something that ought to be engraved in the mind of every Sri Lankan: "First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew. Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist. Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me."

Democracy was restored by President Wijetunga, and it has continued since then though in a flawed form. We need people like Lasantha – though not necessarily cast in the same heroic mould – to improve our democracy, and indeed to preserve it. I must confess that I was no admirer of his brand of journalism. The Sunday Leader certainly scored triumphs in investigative journalism, and the sparkling polemics of its editorials made them a delight to read. But its blatant partisanship put me off, and besides he got it all wrong about the war. Nevertheless his exemplary courageousness – showing the will to stand up for himself and for others, which is at the core of democracy. – makes him our worthy democratic icon.

I come now to the question of what his assassination signifies: who did it and why? It belongs to the category of assassinations that are carried out in broad daylight with several members of the public as spectators, none of whom will dare to come forward as witnesses, the kind of assassination that we all know will never be solved. The assassins in such cases obviously believe that they have the license to kill with impunity because they have the backing of powerful personages within the State. This does not mean however that the President or his Government were behind the assassination. I find that impossible to believe because a government is never as popular as after resounding military victories. Why on earth should it want to besmirch its reputation at this time? I find it very hard to believe that the UNP was behind it either. It seems profitless to speculate on who was behind the assassination and why because we cannot hope to come to any conclusion about it.

Instead we should focus on its possible significance. The fact of obvious significance is that our foremost icon of democracy has been silenced. The issue is that of democracy versus dictatorship. It is possible that we will shortly face a threat to democracy of a more serious order than ever before. One reason is that after a protracted war systemic change of a radical or revolutionary order can take place. Another reason is there has been widespread disgust with the behaviour of our politicians, and possibly serious disillusionment about democracy – at least about democracy as practiced or malpractised in Sri Lanka. It is significant that in the euphoria of recent military victories noises of a fascist order were made against our minorities by some notables. A spokesman of the JHU made a statement in favour of dictatorship, and so did S.B. Dissanayake more recently. Such people are genuinely concerned about Sri Lanka and mean well by it, and that precisely is what makes them dangerous to democracy.

What we have to fear is not so much the outright imposition of a dictatorship as the drift towards one as happened after 1977. What should we do to counter that possibility? We must firstly recognize that no amount of institutional change is going to safeguard democracy. For that there has to be an underlying democratic will among the people, as I have argued in this article, a will that has to be shown through our civil society standing up for democracy instead of behaving like a doormat as it did after 1977. It will also help immensely if we can think up a simple and straightforward argument that will convince the people about the value of democracy. I believe I have such an argument – in my view an irrefutable one.

How have we come to win the war? The excellent performance by our armed forces, of course. But behind that is the following political factor: our Government practices democracy while the LTTE practices dictatorship. This fits in with the fact that in the modern era wars are invariably won by the more democratic side. It means that if the Government was dictatorial and the LTTE democratic, we would have lost the war. Can we be so mad as to jettison a political system that has brought us our military victory?

We must look into the possible reasons why it seems to be an invariant law that wars are won by the democratic side. I believe that it is to be found in one of the two consequences that flow from the unbridled power that goes with dictatorship, one of which is an inability to distinguish between right and wrong, and the other is a weakened grasp of reality. The second of these is germane to my purpose in this article. The best illustration I can think of is Hitler and his Nazi dictatorship, about which there is an immense wealth of detailed material available. It can be shown very convincingly that from the time he acquired dictatorial power right to the end he displayed a weakened grasp of reality. As the facts are well-known I will not go into any details in this article.

My argument can certainly be illustrated by the trajectory of our ethnic conflict as well. The scale of the UNP’s 1977 election victory was so great that J.R.Jayawardena went almost instantly mad with power, and quickly made himself a dictator. Instead of making the necessary political concessions to the Tamils – which at that time could have led to a political solution without much difficulty – he carried out a program of State terrorism which reached its genocidal apogee in 1983. By the time he relinquished power there were two major rebellions in this small island, of the LTTE and the JVP, the IPKF was behaving like an aggressive occupying army, and the Government had virtually lost control over a third of the national territory and almost half the coastline. All that was certainly the consequence of the weakened grasp of reality that went with JRJ’s dictatorial power.

After President Wijetunga, a democratic political order has held sway in Sri Lanka even though it may be deeply flawed in some ways, while at the same time the LTTE came to exercise absolute and total power over the areas under its control. It seems reasonable to suppose that the resulting weakened grasp of reality led to all the policy mistakes that have led to the LTTE’s present plight. The spectacle of Prabhakaran being holed up in his Kilinochchi bunker made everyone think of Hitler’s last days in his Berlin bunker.

It does not seem necessary to go into more detail to show that it could be hazardous for us to resort to dictatorial government. It might lead to our snatching political defeat from the jaws of military victory. We must somehow stick to democracy. Lasantha should be living at this hour.

Like Palestine ,in Sri Lanka Today, hope is a four letter word

By Qadri Ismail

Bulldozed from the land, bombarded from the air and sea, brutalized in general, one would think the Palestinian people would make a sensible calculation, put their hands up and surrender. They don’t.

Most of the world is with them, but that doesn’t really matter because the dominant global power, the United States, is against. Indeed, the U. S. refuses to prevent, or even condemn, the merciless assault of the Israeli state. Thus encouraging, abetting it. Barack Obama’s silence is particularly repugnant.

One would think that Palestinians would get the message. They don’t.

Their cause seems so hopeless some might even think they should capitulate. Clearly, however, they won’t.

Like Palestine, in Sri Lanka today hope is a four letter word.

TCQI1.JPG

[The bodies of two brothers, ages 5 and 7, at a hospital in Beit Lahiya. The brothers were reportedly killed in the strike on the school-more Conflict in Gaza pic-NYTimes]

In the three years since the Rajapakse brothers captured the presidency, our citizens continue to be denied equality, our rights have been stolen systematically, our lives are increasingly terrorized. The constitution is treated, at best, as an inconvenience. The press, a threat. Human rights activists are accused of aiding terrorism. One of our leading lawyers, J. C. Weliamuna, had his home grenaded. Lasantha Wickrematunge was murdered – for opposing, as everyone including its apologists is aware, the government and its warmongers.

The Tamils, of course, are the primary target of this regime’s policy of systematic slaughter. Since Don Shelton Senanayake, they have been less than equal citizens. Since Junius Richard Jayawardene, they have been brutalized. Mahinda Percy Rajapakse and his brothers are inspired by the worst examples of both.

Under the pretext of a war on terror, Tamils are routinely murdered, maimed, displaced, dispossessed in Sri Lanka today. Never before in our postcolonial history have they felt more politically insignificant. Never before has their every step been monitored, scrutinized. They are even denied the right to move freely across the country. More than a thousand are arbitrarily detained in northern camps – including some fleeing the LTTE. The number incarcerated in the south is unknown.

In Sri Lanka today, the Muslims, too, are being made politically irrelevant. In the east, under the pretext of saving the environment, hundreds of acres of their land have been alienated. At some future stage, no doubt, this property will be transferred to Sinhala settlers. Soon it may be next to impossible for Muslims to elect representatives from any but the most densely populated parts of the east (like Kaththankudy).

In such a context, it is infuriatingly ironic to find Rajapakse, not to mention the JVP, express sympathy for the Palestinian people. The same Rajapakse who unabashedly buys guns and gunships from Israel. Similar weapons, no doubt, to those directed, as you read this, at Palestinian lives. If not Palestinian life itself.

For the Rajapakse regime is like the Israeli state.

The Iranian government of that anti-Semitic anti-imperialist, Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, may think it proper to subsidize the brothers – despite their repression of Sri Lankan Muslims. Despite the fact that Iranian money ends up subsidizing the Israeli arms industry. Despite the Defense Secretary’s own admission on Wednesday that the Sri Lankan and Israeli navies exchange ideas on tactics. But, to repeat: the Rajapakse regime is like the Israeli state.

Palestine is a territory occupied by Israel. An analogous argument could be made about the Sri Lankan army in the north and east.

The Palestinians are an oppressed people. So are the Tamils.

Israel is a pariah state. So is the Rajapakse regime.

The sympathy of the conscience of the world is with the Palestinians. And the Tamils.

The Israeli military says it targets only the resistance. And yet, most of its casualties are civilians. The same is true of the rhetoric and victims of the Sri Lankan military.

The Israeli government often stages military actions around elections. The Rajapakses, ditto.

The Israeli government only accepts Palestinian politicians it can puppet, like Mahmoud Abbas. The Rajapakses pull the strings of Douglas Devananda, “Karuna” Muralitharan and “Pillayan” Chandrakanthan.

Israeli leaders are routinely accused of corruption. The Rajapakse brothers appear to revel in it.
Parallels are not restricted to the present, but extend historically.

The Israeli state has systematically settled Jews in Palestinian territory. Perhaps they learned this from the Sinhala state, which has pursued such a policy since Senanayake.

And Israelis Jews believe themselves to be a chosen people. That god himself bequeathed Palestine to them as their exclusive homeland. Likewise, Sinhala Buddhists believe Buddha himself blessed this country as their sole possession.

If you believe in absurdities, said Voltaire, you will commit atrocities.

Unfortunately, in both Palestine and Sri Lanka, atrocious acts are not limited to one party. The Palestinian resistance has targeted, killed and injured Israeli civilians. Just as much as the LTTE, once upon a time at the urging of the Indian state, has constantly targeted and murdered Sinhala civilians.

Such practice is ethically unacceptable. It cannot be whitewashed by any alibi. Murder, even to counter state-sanctioned murder, remains murder.

Such practice is also politically counter-productive. Like the Palestinian, I unequivocally endorse the Tamil demand to resolve their future. The Rajapakses, instead, would resolve it for them.

But the actions of the LTTE have weakened the Tamil cause and their case. Indeed, the LTTE’s authoritarian methods have significantly alienated the Tamil people themselves: the drafting at gun-point of children for its army, the killing of dissenting Tamils like K. Padmanabha and Rajini Thiranagama and hundreds of others, the forced evacuation of the Jaffna population in 1995. The list is long. Despite this government’s brutality, due mostly to its own actions, the LTTE no longer enjoys the popular support it did in the 1980s and 90s.

It does not follow, however, that most Tamils who diverge from the LTTE support this racist regime. They don’t.

It does not follow that the Tamils believe, despite Rajapakse’s bombast, that this is a government of all the people. They don’t. Even Devananda, Muralitharan and Chandrakanthan don’t believe that.

Or that the Tamil people, however terrorized they might be today, will surrender their struggle for peace with equality, with justice, with honor.

Like the Palestinians, hell no, they won’t.

January 19, 2009

Whither the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam?

by D.B.S. Jeyaraj

Recent developments on the war front in Northern Sri Lanka have caused bewilderment and disappointment to many supporters and sympathisers of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

There were many who thought that the LTTE was going to defeat the Sri Lankan armed forces conclusively and deliver an Independent state of Tamil Eelam on a platter.

0119dbsj.JPG

[Norwegian facilitaters and the LTTE leadership in 2004]

They were willing to overlook, gloss over, ignore or blatantly deny the various human rights violations perpetrated by the LTTE because they thought these were necessary evils on the path to liberation. [Click here to read the article in full in dbsjeyaraj.com]

President must do the right thing by implementing practical measures

by Atticus

John Maynard Keynes, the economist, is widely quoted as saying "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?" The quote comes to mind when reflecting on the current attitudes to devolution. The facts relevant to devolution have changed fundamentally in the last few decades. Views, however, are stuck in a time warp.

We hear the same arguments repeated vociferously, and ceaselessly, that a political solution (a euphemism for devolution) is the sine qua non for peace in the country. It is implied that devolution well beyond the 13th Amendment of the Constitution (apparently the views of the APRC) is the only way to accommodate the "historical" grievances of the Tamils, to address the aspirations of the Tamil people to, to reconcile the Tamils to the Sri Lankan state, to achieve a real and sustainable peace in the country, to permit the Tamils to live in dignity and to share power in equal partnership. Quite a tall order for devolution to fulfill.

It is quite understandable that articulate Tamils living here, and those who have moved to greener pastures, feel, in reality or perception, that Tamils are being treated as second class citizens. The state security measures combating the LTTE insurrection has weighed heavily on them individually, to a greater or lesser extent, or in respect of someone they know. Likewise the foreign cash flushed NGOs, for reasons best known to themselves, have been prominent advocates of widespread devolution.

Then there are the hordes of peripatetic diplomats from Western countries arriving in Colombo who look at the embassy files stretching back decades, fraternize with foreign funded NGO types and anti-government politicians. Many of them are then loud-mouthed saying there is no military solution against the LTTE and call for a cease fire. They demand a political solution (aka extensive devolution) before the LTTE has been defeated militarily.

Some of these diplomats are beyond the pale of civilized diplomatic practice. What sort of diplomat gives an oration at a funeral turned into an Opposition political event? Others are well liked and well intentioned towards the country ("Call me Bob"). The well regarded and respected Indian diplomats are in a category of their own because of constraints stemming from political pressures in Tamilnadu.

It is among the politicians that "argumentative dialogue" is sorely lacking. The UNP has sat out the APRC process with a total lack of logic and sagacity. Perhaps it hopes by this gross dereliction of responsibility to blame the Government for the proposals emerging from the APRC process. For some, too little power is devolved. For others, too much.

It is the JVP alone since 2004, if not before, that dimly recognized there was a case to answer relating to Tamil grievances but that devolution was not the answer. Unfortunately it never fleshed out its Tamil policy. After taking positive initiatives regarding the estate Tamils, the JVP leadership pressed the self-destruct button and sailed in a self-satisfied manner towards oblivion.

The Government has blown hot and cold with devolution. The majority of Government parliamentarians are probably resigned to accepting some form of wider devolution than currently prevailing. It seems a necessity if only to satisfy Big Brother India in the aftermath of ousting the LTTE from all territory.

In what ways have the plates shifted, and the facts changed fundamentally, that makes the case for any devolution, let alone more devolution than prevailing, much weaker as a political solution than it was in the past

First over half a million (probably many more) "Ceylon" Tamils have left the country primarily to Europe, North America and Australia. They have left for good. More leave every year (25,000 a year?) for a variety of reasons such as joining families, marriage, employment or as asylum seekers. The Tamil Diaspora is doing well in the countries that they have settled.

The Tamil exodus includes much of the crème de la crème of the Tamil elite (professionals). It was that elite who were in the forefront of fighting for Tamil "nation" rights. The number of "Ceylon Tamils" in Sri Lanka is now thought to be about 2 million people or less, or 10% or less of the total population.

The Tamils remaining are overwhelmingly workers, farmers and traders with needs very different from the Tamil elites. Is it really warranted to frame a constitutional system to satisfy the demands of a historical Tamil elite who have left the country for good? Or to satisfy a minute Tamil elite living in the country that makes demands that have little resonance to the Tamil workers and farmers?

Second, a large majority of Tamils live outside the Northern Province---the province where 99% of the settled people are Tamils. With devolution it may be considered a "homeland". But in what way can devolution of power to the Northern Province be judged a political solution for the legitimate grievances of the Tamil population or Tamil "nation" as a whole? The vast majority of the Tamil population would have to learn to share power in other provinces with the Sinhala people as well as other minority groups, in order to find solutions to their grievances.

Third, in the aftermath of the War where much blood has been shed, and much hardship endured by the Tamils in the Northern Province, the circumstances are not conducive to hold free and fair elections. Those who feel humiliated by the defeat of the LTTE, especially many in the Diaspora, may well spend billions of rupees to elect separatists and front men (TNA?) to the Northern Province Council so that they would clamour for more power, and the withdrawal of the armed forces from the North.

The provincial system may be made unworkable by acts of terrorism. The Government would then have to spend billions of rupees to preserve law and order, and to safeguard the North against terrorist infiltrators and the flow of terrorist weaponry. Back to square one in dealing with terrorists unless Western nations stop the Tamil Diaspora funding of separatism and terrorism and India prevents any arms smuggling to Sri Lanka.

Even if there is no turning back, and some form of truncated devolution as a political settlement "flies", there is scope for other measures that could be adopted to transform the relationship between the Tamil community and the majority in the country.

These could be implemented not as a means of massaging the ego of the Tamil elite both here and abroad, of caving into western countries for thirty pieces of silver, of indulging the caterwauling foreign funded NGOs, or as a response to the whining and whinging of the Opposition and its allies.

They should be implemented solely because the President and the Government believe that they are the right things to do.

A list of such measures could include:

---a commitment to compulsory bilingualism in Sri Lankan over a 15 year period. With the primary classes in 2009 (and progressively raising the bar year by year) every Sinhala child would be taught Tamil as a second language, and every Tamil child taught Sinhala as a second language.

--- a commitment to compulsory bilingualism in the public service. All salary increments and promotions in government service after 2015 would depend on basic knowledge of both languages.

--- a commitment to positive discrimination of Tamil language job seekers in public service recruitment until the proportion of public servants from the minorities at various levels are equal to their proportion of the population (20-25%). The target must be reached before the end of next Parliament.

--- a commitment for a three year period of a guaranteed purchase scheme (and subsidy) for the agricultural commodities produced in the Northern Province at a price 25% above prevailing market prices.

--- a commitment to establish 100 high quality technical colleges to teach literacy, numeration and technical skills (possibly also basic English) in areas heavily populated by Tamils in different provinces, notably the Northern Province and the Central Province. That task should be assigned to someone such as Anandasagiri, possibly assisted by Wigneswaran, to beg and borrow money from the Government, foreign donors, the Tamil Diaspora and the corporate sector to implement the scheme.

--- a commitment to promote the preaching of Buddhism to the Tamil population, especially in the plantation sector, and Hinduism to the Sinhala population.

The President has the opportunity to be a great President in the mould of Abraham Lincoln to bind and bond the Nation as a whole including erstwhile separatists and their sympathizers. In order to do so, he needs to take a lone, heroic stand by refusing to join the Gadarene rush over the devolution cliff to a free fall nobody knows where. Would he opt out? It is a tantalizing question. One can only hold one`s breath.

LTTE oppression makes Wanni civilians hate LTTE

by Gomin Dayasri

Those making the crossing from around Mullativu are a different lot, from others who crossed during the last few months. They know it is twilight time for the sun god awaiting a call to be beheaded. Escape, he must, if he is to survive but before he could, those who lived in his domain have decided to move. They are certain that the LTTE is destined to lose, so why wait?

Suresh, an LTTE fighter had ridden his bicycle to an not knowing the Army had already moved in so deep into the LTTE heartland. "Cadres know they cannot fight the army with 15 days training. All males between 18-40 are conscripted. So they run when the army fires as they cannot stand and fight. The will to fight is no longer there even among our senior cadres. More will desert. Previously, their mother or father were taken into custody as a form of insurance - now the LTTE is ineffective. If they knew how well we are treated more will cross. We were told repeatedly that the Army will kill or maim us." He had surrendered, but many come in groups, with a front liner often carrying a white flag.

Twenty-three-year-old Ranga was promised IT training, but instead given a crash course in military instructions and sent to the battlefront. He was brainwashed about the so-called atrocities committed by the Army, so he feared surrendering. He was shown newspaper articles of roaming white vans. They were lectured on the need that "all must be together to win the war." He came to the conclusion that the forces were moving rapidly and the LTTE is in disarray and many have taken flight and no longer can orders be effectively communicated to the public.

Young men were watching the finals of the one day international against Bangladesh

squatting or stretched on the floor of the displaced persons camp (luxury to those who came from a district without electricity), seeing Murali display his skills with the bat on the brink of defeat, the soldiers on guard joined to watch TV; the poignant moment was when the soldiers and the young boys from the North, in unison cheered lustily as the winning stroke was made. One Nation, One People.

Those in the camps from the Killinochchi District have sharp insights. The fall of the LTTE strongholds accelerated with the departure of the NGOs’ from the area; obviously the second line of defense of the LTTE. It was these foreign organizations that provided the LTTE with first aid facilities for the injured, excess fuel for vehicles, preservative food rations for the fighting formations and building material for the construction of makeshift bunkers.

The largest project undertaken by the NGOs was providing equipment for the construction of the many high embankments, which girdled principle towns that thwarted the progress of the Forces. The LTTE could not survive for long without inputs of these NGOs which operated from Killinochchi. Often, these foreigners, could be seen enjoying the ala carte menu of the Terrorist Kitchen in happier times.

Army’s hospitalable treatment assuaged the initial fears instilled by the LTTE. At the crossing points itself, the new arrivals are served with tea and biscuits. Soon, a Tamil speaking officer arrives to offer comfort. Kind words are balm to scared souls. It was the women who feared most, but the trepidation eased with the service of food parcels and the arrival of women officers, with buses being provided to take them to camps. With the LTTE presence diminishing in operational areas, the people were able to bring more belongings and a row of trailers brought the goods to camps.

There were problems in the camps due to inadequate attention by the administration under GA Vavuniya. There was agitation in my presence that there were not sufficient mats for sleeping, whereas there should have been buffer stocks and the camp officers had to ease the tension. It was known days ahead that the flow of refugees would increase. Many felt the GA was not sufficiently caring or was typically bureaucratic!

LTTE trishaws mounted with hailers circle villages, announcing fallaciously the likelihood of an invasion by the Army and demanding they leave homes forthwith. Most knew it was a false alarm, but they had no choice. A ring built around the village by armed terrorists in battle fatigues blocked the many exits making them leave compulsorily to a designated area. Having being shepherded to a virtual concentration camp, the people were compelled to work - build emergency bunkers, fell trees, construct high embankments and dig wells.

Where free speech is not tolerated, there was no right to protest and punishments were galore with jail sentences. A possible effective protest was to launch a hunger strike as it attracted unfavorable publicity in the vicinity. Much of Prabhakaran’s image has been destroyed by his cadres. People remain baffled whether such herding of the population was to create a human shield or a concentration camp for emergency work. The objectives could be twofold.

Weeding bells pealed persistently during the CFA, but the restrictions have come again. The marriages are frowned upon, but permitted on the condition that the honeymoon is on till midnight on the day of the wedding. It was comical that before first light, the groom or the bride had to join to serve the LTTE. It was an early to bed, early to rise manipulation. Who would not care to escape from such a megalomaniac? Life has become more intolerable with the LTTE forces losing ground.

The most horrific story was of an aged cultivator (a former State Timber Corporation employee), who had hidden his two children (boy 27, girl 22) for two years on an islet around the many lagoons.

When the LTTE came in search of them, he told them the girl had disappeared to get married and the boy has run away. At 1.00 or 2.00 a.m. fearing the presence of village spies, the parents used to secretly visit the children in the hideout with ‘roti’ fried in oil so that it is preserved to last three meals. They used to take the children occasionally to a well which did not contain salt water for a bath. The happy family of four I saw at the refugee camp was relieved to be out of the clutches of the terrorists though the comforts at the camp are minimal. There was unanimity that mass forced child recruitment with parents held as sureties which began after the fall of the East, was the most telling factor for Prabhakaran to sully his image.

The boys in the refugee camp discovered a former LTTE child recruiter posing off as a refugee and sought the permission of the lady warden to assault him. Before long the parents joined in the melee, but the camp officials who are duty bound to protect all registered refugees had to intervene and escort him to safety and dispatch the offender to another camp. The little boys jeered him all the way out of the camp while a few cried. He defense was that he had to carry out the orders of the LTTE high command – the stand many took at the Nuremberg trials.

There was the story of human trafficking where LTTE agents safely dumped kids out of their territory to safe homes if Rs. 200,000 was offered. Many affluent parents had resorted to making such payments but there was no verification whether this was authorized by the LTTE or clandestinely carried out. If unauthorized, it would have met with capital punishment, so it is likely that it had the blessings of the high command. The decrepit feeble and the sick had to pay Rs. 5,000 for not making a manual contribution to the cause.

A doctor at the government hospital had often asked patients who came, why they arrived for treatment to discourage non LTTE cadres from visiting the hospital. It did not surprise me since I was told the same question was being asked by a high public official from refugees who came to the camp over the last few days. The LTTE still has its operatives in strange places!

A middle aged father from Puthukudiyiruppu described being incarcerated in a prison for sending his son to India in a cubicle designed in the form of a 6 feet x 3 feet kennel and he was fed in the same manner as a dog and was kept chained for 10 days.

A frequent complaint was that provisions doled out by the state or the NGOs were siphoned off by LTTE agents. The LTTE had its own identity card system in place and arrangements with the cooperatives to which the food was dispatched. The goods were over priced and the locals knew part of it was channeled to LTTE pockets. Vegetables sell at Rs. 400 per kilo, a petrol liter sells presently at Rs. 1,000 and a litre of kerosene at Rs. 320. Tractor motors have been modified to pick up on petrol and run on kerosene.

These traumatized people coming from entrapped areas yearn for peace. Their right to live a normal life has been more abridged than ours. Do not doubt that the days of the LTTE are numbered. They, more than us, want the LTTE decimated for their own good. The wear and tear of hard life under the LTTE bears telltale marks on their faces, which shows more age than the passing years. The swiftness of the desired military victory is with the hope that normalcy will return to their lives in their lifetime.

Tamil Nadu State to be "paralysed" until Colombo declares ceasefire

By Mrinalini Ramachandra

All work and transport in the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu will be paralysed indefinitely until the Sri Lankan Government of President Mahinda Rajapakse declares a ceasefire.

Two regional political party leaders from the pre-dominantly Tamil state have decided to launch a massive state – wide hartal or Bandh (stoppage of work) in the state until Colombo calls off the war against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

The joint decision to this effect was made by Pattaligal Makkal Katchi (PMK) led by Dr. Ramadoss and Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchy (VCK) led by T. Thirumaavalavan.

Consequent to the decision the VCK leader called off his four day protest fast

The hartal is expected to paralyse all activity in the state for an indefinite period till the ceasefire demand is met.

Transport will cease except for Ambulances and vehicles carrying milk for children

The hardline decision comes in the wake of Indian Foreign secretary Shiv Shanker Menon’s visit to Sri Lanka where the issue of a ceasefire was not discussed

This was contrary to the pledge given by Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that he would send his foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee to Sri Lanka and negotiate a ceasefire when a delegation of political parties led by Chief Minister Muttuvel Karunanindhi met him in New Delhi.

Menon’s visit was regarded as a preliminary move in that direction but the foreign secretary went on record that discussing a ceasefire was not his “brief”.

The foreign secy also dodged media persons at the Chennai Airport and boarded a New Delhi bound plane using a backdoor entrance

Presspersons were waiting to quiz Menon while returning to India from Sri Lanka

The PMK and VCK will meet chief minister Karunanidhi to canvass support

The support and solidarity of likeminded parties will be solicited

Liberation Leopards Leader ends fast: Over 100 arrested for damaging 35 buses

Thol. Thirumavalavan the leader of the Liberation Leopards Party of Tamil Nadu ended his proclaimed fast unto death after four days even as 35 buses in Tamil Nadu were damged and over a 100 arrested.

The LLP known in Tamil as the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi is ardently supportive of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka.

The Viduthalai Chiruthaikal Katchi (VCK) leader Thol. Thirumavalavan called off his fast, accepting PMK leader S.Ramadoss’ suggestion for “an indefinite bandh till a ceasefire is announced in Sri Lanka,” even as over a 100 VCK cadres were held across the State for damaging buses.

Nine of them have been booked under the National Security Act for burning buses. Mr.Thirumavalavan began his protest on January 15.

Dr. Ramadoss, who met Mr. Thirumavalavan at the fasting venue, said Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi could organise an all-party meeting in a common venue to discuss the suggestion.

“Since the Chief Minister asked us to come out with a proposal, I am placing it before his consideration,” Dr. Ramadoss said. The PMK leader said the protest should bring the State to a standstill. “Barring the movement of ambulances and milk supply, no other activity should be allowed. It should go on till the Indian government intervenes and ensures a ceasefire in Sri Lanka,” he said.

Mr. Thirumavalavan said his objective was not to embarrass the State government or the Chief Minister. “My protest seemed to have no effect on the Indian government. My party will not have any truck with the Congress in the future,” he declared.Earlier, the meeting of the VCK office-bearers urged Mr. Thirumavalavan to give up his protest in view of his deteriorating health condition.

CPI (M) State secretary N. Varadarajan also called on Mr Thirumavalavan and explained to him that his party was for stopping the war.

“The Central government should speed up the diplomatic efforts to find a solution since innocent people are severely affected in the war,” he said.

Meanwhile More than 100 activists of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchigal (VCK) were held in different parts of the State for damaging buses. More than 35 buses were damaged.

The police arrested the activists who indulged in violence while garnering support for Tamils living in Sri Lanka.

A senior government official said that nine persons were detained under the National Security Act for burning buses. The rest were arrested for stone throwing.

Deputy Inspector-General Masana Muthu issued shoot-at-sight orders on Sunday morning for Cuddalore and Villupuram districts following violent protests by the activists.

More than 30 buses were damaged in stone throwing and two buses completely gutted in Cuddalore and Villupuram districts. Police arrested a total of 81 activists from 26 places in the two districts. All of them have been remanded to judicial custody.

While 17 buses were damaged in Cuddalore district, 15 were targeted in Villupuram, of which two were completely gutted. Activists distributed pamphlets seeking support for Thol. Thirumavalavan who was on a fast to highlight the issue. One private bus was damaged in Nettapakkam in Puducherry. Night service buses continued to be curtailed in Madurai city and its peripheries for the third consecutive day as miscreants targeted TNSTC (Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation) buses, police said.

On Sunday, some unidentified persons stoned a bus at K. Pudur and fled the scene. K. Pudur police have registered a case. In suburban Madurai, police said there were no fresh incidents on Sunday. However, they were on the lookout for those who torched a bus on Friday midnight. On Saturday night, a Coimbatore-bound bus, parked inthe Arapalayam bus stand was stoned. A group of 15 persons belonging to the Aadhi Tamizhar Peravai were arrested in front of the Madurai Railway station when they attempted to block trains. Police said the accused were released in the evening.

In Perambalur district, about 120 persons, including Parivallal, Mr. Thirumavalavan’s brother, observed fast at Anganur, Mr. Thirumavalavan’s native village, on Sunday expressing solidarity with the fasting leader of the VCK. Several shopkeepers in Ariyalur downed their shutters on Sunday after some members of the VCK made a plea with the traders’ association. In Chennai, DGP K. P. Jain said in a press release that “around ten buses had been subjected to torching and stone-pelting.” He said such incidents would not be tolerated and said all those indulging in violence would be detained under the National Security Act.

The “situation was well under control” and that strong action was being taken by the police, he added.

(compiled from News Agency and Newspaper reports)

January 18, 2009

How Mahinda reacted when heard of attack on Lasantha

by Sonali Samarasinghe Wickrematunge

While the government attempted to drown out the cries of outrage and sounds of weeping over the brutal murder of The Sunday Leader Editor-in-Chief Lasantha Wickrematunge with the pounding of bombs in the north, its claims of victory on the military front may now not be enough to hold the regime together.

Hours after news of Lasantha's murder rocked the entire country, government ministers and other SLFPers were already jittery, privately blaming the government for its failure to stop a dangerous trend within the country culminating with this brutal killing. Some UNP crossers over were visibly angry at the government's failure to address the culture of impunity that had gripped the nation stating they had not crossed over to nurture this kind of break down of rule of law.

LWTUK0118.jpg

Body language

As the shocking news of Lasantha's murder reached parliament last Thursday morning (8) the corridors were filled with those decrying the deed as a foul and despicable act.

Yet quickly the exigencies of political survival would kick in. Lasantha was a journalist who had a wide range of contacts from across the political divide. Albeit this wide circle of friends and acquaintances dotted in their hundreds in the national and international political milieu the body language of the ruling regime following his murder was uncomfortable and distant at best.

Hardly any government minister save for a smattering of those UNP crossers over, felt it politically expedient to pay their last respects to a man who had stood up for the rights of all during his rich life.

Frightening

But for the tremendous crowds that did come, the realisation was clear. That at no time before had they lived through more frightening times. From the spontaneity with which passers joined the massive protest procession it was evident that at least in that moment of emotion, these massive crowds had joined for one shining moment the journey traversed by one man. A colossus in his time. A man who had no fear.

Certainly if there was ever a time for the establishment to get rid of the nuisance that is Lasantha Wickrematunge, then this time was that time. The government was pushing forward on the military front capturing large swathes of territory while the LTTE retreated to the jungles of Mullaitivu. Drunk with power and buoyed up by a wave of optimism over the war, Lasantha's murderers - whoever they maybe - could take false comfort in the knowledge that the current military successes could be effectively used to soften the impact of such an outrageous and high profile assassination.

Yes. Lasantha's funeral was not attended by the entire government despite many of its members including President Rajapakse admittedly being closely associated with him.

And one could hardly expect a peep about the assassination from Lasantha's friend President Rajapakse even today as he delivers a political speech at the UPFA's first propaganda rally of the upcoming Provincial Council election in Matale.

It would be the first public rally to be addressed by the President after the recent military successes in the north and the government will continue to sell the war and ride on this wave of euphoria that is being fueled by government propaganda machines as it drowns out the voices of dissent and the sounds of justice.

Claims of friendship

Immediately after Lasantha's death, Rajapakse went on every possible television channel to demonstrate his close proximity to the Editor - President Mahinda Rajapakse said he had been invited to Lasantha's wedding on December 27, 2008 and had even invited the newly weds to Temple Trees for a meal. An invitation he claimed they had allegedly accepted.

Just last Wednesday (14) President Mahinda Rajapakse at a media heads and publishers meeting especially convened for the purpose was to even accuse The Sunday Leader Editor Lasantha Wickrematunge of being an informant.

According to the President, Lasantha had told him Karu Jayasuriya was quitting the government and joining the UNP. However sources close to Lasantha said Jayasuriya's crossing over was no secret at the time it was revealed and that Lasantha had mentioned it in passing during an informal chat with Rajapakse in the presence of Dr. Eliyantha White and another businessman.

Useless informant

While President Rajapakse - a man who has been called a cabinet reporter himself by former President Chandrika Kumaratunga finds solace in such innocuous banter, and attempts to tarnish the character of the slain editor in a desperate attempt to demonstrate Lasantha's value as a friend and informant he had yet failed to provide any evidence of a recording or CD to substantiate his claims.

Neither is Lasantha alive to prove or disprove these statements but in his finest work which would alas be his last he predicted his own death. His final editorial titled 'And Then They Came For Me.' in the space of 10 days came to be known as the 'Letter from the Grave' - it has become one of the most viewed and most emailed articles in the world.

In it Lasantha says, "It is well known that I was on two occasions brutally assaulted, while on another my house was sprayed with machine-gun fire. Despite the government's sanctimonious assurances, there was never a serious police inquiry into the perpetrators of these attacks, and the attackers were never apprehended. In all these cases, I have reason to believe the attacks were inspired by the government. When finally I am killed, it will be the government that kills me."

Under your watch

Lasantha continues addressing President Rajapakse, "You will never be allowed to forget that my death took place under your watch. As anguished as I know you will be, I also know that you will have no choice but to protect my killers: you will see to it that the guilty one is never convicted. You have no choice. I feel sorry for you."

It is true that Lasantha and Mahinda Rajapakse had been friends for over 20 years. But it was only recently that the two had begun meeting again - and that too at the insistence of Rajapakse.

Lasantha never went for the monthly editors meetings convened by the President's Office but for the last couple of months before his death he had visited the President's House for dinner - in the presence of two friends. Lasantha was at first apprehensive about this Presidential call to a rapprochement but later relented.

Oluwatada wedune?

Be that as it may, on the morning of Thursday, January 8, President Rajapakse was busy with meetings at Temple Trees. At a meeting of four associations related to the coconut industry the President had been talking with key industrialists about the problems facing them in the present economic scenario.

The meeting was attended by the Coconut Product Exporters Association, the Coir Products Association, the Horticultural Exporters' Association and the Poultry Association where representatives of these bodies were making presentations setting out the current problems facing exporters.

While the Coconut Product Association presentation was being made by its representatives Rajapakse was to get a phone call. He would listen attentively interjecting only once to say 'oluwatada wedune' before terminating the call.

Immediately assuming the matter related to the military drive in the north and wondering if the President would be in a mood to continue with a coconut exporters' presentation the representative asked 'Can I continue Sir?' at which time Rajapakse told him to please continue his presentation.

In fact when a representative from the Poultry Association observed during the meeting that due to certain constraints they were better off doing business in Singapore, Rajapakse was to say jokingly 'then we should send you to Singapore.'

However when it was time to ask questions President Rajapakse had told those present, 'I'm hungry, aren't you'll hungry let's go out and eat.'

Those at the meeting and President Rajapakse then went out of the meeting room to the Temple Trees dining room to partake of presidential victuals. Having escorted the attendees outside, Rajapakse was to go into his office and they were informed the meeting was over.

It was only when the representatives of the Coconut Exporters Associations had come out of Temple Trees and collected their confiscated mobile phones that they realised Lasantha Wickrematunge had been fatally attacked.

That was not the only meeting President Rajapakse would attend that morning. He was also scheduled to meet with bankers and representatives of small and medium industries which he would do. Again Rajapakse was seen to receive two calls which he answered and then continued with the meeting at hand.

Eliyantha White

Be that as it well may, medical sources at Kalubowila reveal that at the time Lasantha was brought into the OPD that Thursday morning his pulse was a low 43, he had dilated pupils and his right ear was oozing blood.

It was some time after crack medical teams had started to work on Lasantha that Dr. Eliyantha White had walked in to the hospital. He had informed a close family member that Lasantha had in fact called him that morning on his way to office to tell him that he was being followed and to convey this message to President Rajapakse.

White was supposedly a herbal medicine man somewhat well regarded among certain politicians and also President Rajapakse.

White had informed this family member that he had immediately called the President but the President had been otherwise occupied in the Budu Ge (Shrine Room) for about 45 minutes. When the President returned his call, Eliyantha had told this family member, 'The deed had already been done.'

Injury

Meanwhile Lasantha was in the Emergency Unit of the Kalubowila Hospital with an injury to his head. We already know from eyewitness accounts that his car was surrounded by assailants on four dark hued motorbikes.

We know that the windows of both the drivers' side and the passenger side had been smashed. We know that a witness had allegedly seen one of the assailants on the passenger side of the car pulling out a weapon of sorts - likely a heavy metal pole wrapped in a newspaper and smashing it into the head of Lasantha.

Lasantha according to police sources may have fallen onto the passenger seat sideways when he was attacked from the drivers' side of the car.

Base of skull fracture

From the injury on the skull medical sources who do not wish to be named say the metal pole may have had at its lethal end two sharp points driven into it. Lasantha also suffered a base of skull fracture due to pressure from within.

Police sources say that two noises were heard during the attack but they did not sound like gunshots. Police sources so far allegedly claim that spent cartridges have not been found.

The government has rejected calls to bring in a team of international experts to investigate the killing of Sunday Leader Editor Lasantha Wickrematunge, saying the Sri Lanka Police were capable of conducting the investigation themselves.

Conspiracy theories

This is even as elements in the government like the JHU put forward absurd claims of CIA conspiracies relating to the murder.

Meanwhile, the police are said to be conducting a separate investigation to ascertain whether there is a link between the recent attack on the MTV/MBC studio in Pannipitiya and the assassination of Lasantha.

Dead end

However these crack local police teams so far have said they have no leads in either investigation, but were analysing fingerprints found at the two scenes. DIG Prasanna Nanayakkara is in charge of two teams the government says is working on the case.

And even as the government is on the one hand publicising the war and trumpeting its victories to drown out the cries for justice over Lasantha on the other hand it is quickly building up bogus conspiracy theories to point fingers elsewhere not only over Lasantha's assassination but also on the attack on MTV/MBC two days before Lasantha was killed.

Politicising investigations

IGP Jayantha Wickremaratne sources say have had several conferences with investigation teams on the subject while reliable sources said the authorities had also called for the files of Richard de Zoysa and other journalists killed during the UNP era to use in a political debate over the killing of Lasantha rather than focus on bringing the culprits to book.

The government has also gone into panic mode for the same reason. The Dean of the Diplomatic Corps in Colombo German Ambassador Juergen Weerth was sharply criticised and summoned Tuesday (12) by Foreign Secretary Palitha Kohona for delivering a funeral oration at Lasantha's funeral on Monday. It did not matter that the contents of his short speech were uncontroversial and indeed appropriate.

Foreign Secretary Palitha Kohona expressed the government's displeasure in private but the Ministry leaked the news to the media right away Foreign Ministry sources said.

Diplomat reprimanded

Weerth in his oration said inter alia, "It is a day where words do not count anymore. It is a day where one remains speechless and one has to say something. Maybe we should have raised our voice before.

"Today it is too late. It is a day when humanity has lost a major voice of truth...But what remains is his legacy and what he meant to each of us.

Let us honour his work, his courage and his example. As Dean of the Diplomatic Corps may I extend our deepest condolences to the family, the staff of The Sunday Leader and all here who have had the privilege to call Lasantha a friend as have I."

Given the outpouring of public support for Lasantha's cause it was also a day the government was to feel at its lowest and at its most vulnerable.

Public concern

And it is this response by the government that gives rise to public concern regarding the objectivity of the government when conducting investigations into Lasantha's death.

Many steps that even to a layman should perhaps have been taken seem to have not. Although the types of motorcycles the assassins used have been identified by witnesses no public appeal has been made to establish their whereabouts. Though there is reason to believe that the nature of the murder weapon is known no description of it has yet been published calling for information from the public who may know who possessed or manufactured such a weapon.

These are matters that need to be clarified even as it is important to see that the investigation into Lasantha's murder does not in any way follow in the path of the investigation into the murder on New Guinean Rugby Player Joel Pera.

It is vital that the government for its own survival - whether it is a fair perception or otherwise - is not seen to be embarking on both a cover up and a campaign to confuse the evidence so as to secure an acquittal even if the murderers are eventually apprehended.

And if Lasantha lay bleeding on a hospital table January 8 morning the government was busy trying to hush it up. Minister Dulles Alahapperuma was to call up some media houses and advise them to lie low on the issue. That evening on the Rathu Ira programme UNP MP Jayalath Jayawardena, a guest on the show was asked by one of the producers to not touch on the slaying of Lasantha Wickrematunge but to stick to the agreed subject of provincial council elections.

The main evening news bulletin of the government owned Independent Television Network made no mention of the killing of Lasantha on Thursday night even though it was obviously the top story of the day. The other state media barely made mention of it merely using it as a filler at best.

With national and international support pouring in for the Editor the government now resorted to desperate damage control. President Rajapakse on hearing the Editors were planning to carry a common lead story on the assassination was to even call the Sunday Times Chairman Ranjith Wijewardena on the matter to have it stopped.

Alliances in a common cause

Meanwhile the broad opposition front, civil society and women's organisations were never more bonded to one common cause than after Lasantha's brutal assassination.

UNP's Jayalath Jayawardena had already taken steps to write to the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and the International Press Union to muster support for a more concerted campaign against the culture of impunity cultivated by the Rajapakse government.

NGOs, civil society, professionals and businessmen will next Tuesday (20) meet to set up a broad front for the Right to Live and The Freedom of Expression.

Last Wednesday (14) a group of about 35 people met at Opposition Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe's Cambridge Terrace office to prepare a framework for future action.

Wickremesinghe had come out all guns firing slamming the government for the attacks on the MTV/MBC Station and the assassination of Lasantha Wickrematunge, alleging an elite killer squad within the security establishment was behind the attacks.

Given the outrage generated across the island over the brutal events of last week it would seem that the government though winning on the military front may not be doing so on all other fronts.

COURTESY: THE SUNDAY LEADER

Why Sirimavo refused to visit Jaffna after 1964 cyclone

By Neville Jayaweera

In the last week of December 1964 a cyclone of unprecedented ferocity devastated the Northern Province. The fishing villages of Myliddy, Kankesanturai, Point Pedro, Nargakovil and several areas within the Jaffna district were reduced to a wilderness of sand dunes, stagnant salt water and windswept debris. In the Myliddy fishing village alone, several hundreds lost their lives at sea. The Collector of Ramnad District in SE Tamil Nadu (India) contacted me to say that over 200 bodies had been washed ashore there and he had no alternative but to order mass cremations on the sea shore in order to halt the spread of disease. Throughout the Jaffna District the Kalavoham crop ( the main paddy crop ) was wiped out and hundreds of fishing boats were reduced to matchwood. The distress was appalling.

TCNJ0118.jpgWhen the cyclone struck, my wife and I were in Colombo on Christmas vacation and I had no way of returning to station. The Palaly Airport had been rendered unserviceable and it took me 36 hours, making tortuous detours along the way, round fallen trees and broken culverts, through Puttalam and Anuradhapura, to get back to Jaffna. Eventually, it was R. M. B. Senanayake, my colleague and GA of Vavuniya, who helped my wife and me to get back to base, by placing at our disposal a Land Rover and a driver.

On reaching Jaffna I found conditions were horrendous. Our resources were limited, having no heavy machinery for clearing roads and for rescuing people buried under fallen houses. Everything had to be done by hand and we were hard put to it, to bring relief and succour to hundreds of sorrowing families. All public services, particularly the PWD and the Irrigation Department, and my DROs and village headmen, suspended their normal work and mobilising to a man, struggled valiantly to bring some order out of the chaos. One of the first services to be restored was the telephone link to Colombo.

Call to the Prime Minister

In a personal call I made to Mrs. Bandaranaike at Temple Tress, giving her the grim picture, I pleaded that she should visit the devastated areas immediately. I told her that she should demonstrate to the people of Jaffna that she was indeed the Prime Minister of the whole country and that the Tamil people were as much her people as were the people in the South. I also pointed out that it was a magnificent opportunity for her to heal the long running wounds and to make a new beginning. She listened to me without betraying any feeling and said she will consult her advisors and let me know.

Not content with my personal pleas to the Prime Minister, I also asked my brother Stanley Jayaweera who had close personal links to her, to impress on her the utmost need for her to visit her people in Jaffna at this time of their dire need. Stanley had done exactly as I had asked him to, but her rejoinder to him shattered me.

Referring to the effigy burning that accompanied the abortive Secessionist Campaign an year earlier, she had said,

"Huh! Why should I go to them now, if they burnt my effigy a few months ago. If they did not want me then they must not expect me to come to them now."

Her response filled me with dismay and a deep sadness. It was not just that she failed to respond to her people’s anguish, but the realisation dawned on me that Sri Lanka as a nation had no leader. It was as if the Prime Minister of the country had consciously renounced responsibility for one fourth of her country’s population! Not least, the high esteem in which I had held her after meeting her on several occasions, plummeted.

The US Ambassador Cecil Lyon and the Canadian High Commissioner James George, both sent personal emissaries to condole with the people of Jaffna, and proffer whatever help was within their means to render. I realized of course that their gestures were expressions of goodwill, rather than concrete offers of assistance.

Having decided not to visit her people in their distress, the Prime Minister opted to send the Governor General, William Gopallawa and her Perm. Secr. Mr. N. Q. Dias, along with General Udugama and Admiral Rajan Kadirgamar, to deputize for her. It was a delegation which, though high on rank and heavily weighted with brass, was politically offensive, for what could be more insensitive than sending N. Q. Dias and General Udugama, both names that were symbols of oppression in the minds of the Tamil people, to represent her! The response of the local people was eloquent and scathing. As the Governor General’s convoy drove slowly through all the devastated areas, literally not one local, not even one of the grieving widows, stepped out to meet them. The silence was eerie and overpowering. It was like driving through a graveyard.

It is easy to judge Mrs. Bandaranaike as unforgiving, petty, petulant and paranoid, all of which she probably was, but I also believe that her reaction was symptomatic of a deeper malaise and that she was manifesting attributes that were more than merely personal to her. She was also a creature and victim of a cultural ethos, deeply rooted in her history, of which she was not even aware, which of course does not exculpate her, but helps us to understand the problem at a more complex level. The capacity to transcend peer pressure and one’s inherited culture, and construct one’s own cultural environment based on a set of universal values, such as the Brahma Viharas or the Fruits of the Spirit, ( love, kindness, forgiveness, equanimity, joy and peace) is vouchsafed only to a minuscule few, and clearly Mrs Banadaranike was not one of the few.

Consciousness and the constitution

The disturbing thought began to dawn on me that, none of the politicians of Sri Lanka, whether Sinhala or Tamil, seemed able to transcend their cultural conditioning and historical memories. Worse still, none of them seemed to have any concept of a fully integrated and harmonious Sri Lankan nation, and much less, of how to achieve it, the operative concept here being "nation". Most of them had a vibrant sense of Sinhalaness on one hand, or of Tamilness on the other, but both sides lacked a sense of a Sri Lankaness as a common ground. They seemed to ignore the stark facts of history, which, whether they liked it or not, had over the centuries, constituted Sri Lanka as a mosaic of diverse ethnic groups and religions. That mosaic was a given and irreversible. What Sri Lanka seemed to lack were leaders who could weld those diverse groups into a harmonious polity.

The politicians of all parties, both in the North as well as in the South seemed to reduce the problem of nation building to a constitutional issue - should Sri Lanka have a Unitary Constitution or a Federal Constitution. They did not see nation building as having to do with the more fundamental question of raising consciousness, and forgot that in the absence of a unified consciousness, constitutions by themselves cannot integrate a society, whatever checks and balances may be built into them.

Since the close of WW2 all constitutions dispensed by experts all over the world and handed down to former colonies by the erstwhile masters disappeared from the political landscape within a few decades, proving that, to really work, a constitution must embody the consciousness of the whole national community. The primary task facing a nation’s leaders must therefore be to help develop that consciousness as a necessary condition of a constitution’s viability.

Building a deseeya cintanaya

Building a consciousness of nationhood, or a deseeya cintanaya, is not a responsibility that can be left to politicians and constitutional lawyers. A deseeya chintanaya cannot be legislated, nor can it be secured through structural changes. Unlike a jathika cintanaya, whether Sinhala or Dhamila, which have roots reaching back over two thousand years, the seeds of a deseeya cintanaya have yet to be planted.

It is pre-eminently an educational task, to be initiated at the level of our schools. It requires a new way of looking at history, and helping young minds climb out of the constraints placed on their understanding by the sectarian myths, legends, and memories that are embedded in their ancient chronicles, whether they relate to their Aryan origins or to their Dravidian origins. This does not mean that children should be ignorant of, much less that they should reject, their rich historical inheritance, but that they should acquire a more global view of history and be equipped with a critical sense that will enable them to stand back and look at their respective narratives more objectively.

Building a deseeya chintanaya is a task that also devolves on Civil Society - on artists, novelists and poets, on intellectuals, on film producers, on writers of lyrics and songs, on religious leaders, and on the NGO network. Most of all, it is a task that should be undertaken by newspapers and journalists, who rather than sow to sectarian emotions, should open the minds of their readers to a broader and deeper vision of social reality.

On the other hand, if these agents of Civil Society are themselves not imbued with a deseeya chintanaya, no amount of constitution making and no amount of structural surgery can ever achieve it.

The point I am trying to make here is that our preoccupation with constitution making, whether to have a Unitary or a Federal constitution, whether to devolve and how much to devolve, misses the point. In fact, they are escape routes from reality. The reality is that in the absence of a consciousness of nationhood, constitution making is a spurious game. Constitutions do not create social reality but only reflect it. On this point I also demur from classical Marxist theory which claims that economic relations are the primary determinants of social and political relations. Marxists forget that even bringing social and political relations into sync with the underlying economic relations requires the re-engineering of consciousness, or as Paulo Frère pointed out, the "consciencetisation" of the people, which is a rather convoluted form of saying that transforming the consciousness of the people is primary.

Where there is no underlying consciousness of nationhood, constitutions and structures that claim to ensure it serve only to conceal its absence. They are merely forms without substance.

The missing X factor

So, what has been that absent X factor in shaping Sri Lanka’s consciousness as a nation? I believe that the missing X factor is leadership. More than any other single factor, it is leadership that catalyses separateness into unity, and conflict into harmony, and it requires a great leader to carry a society from tribalism to nationhood.

Sri Lanka’s inability to produce leaders who combined a great vision with moral stature, has been crucial. I believe that Sri Lanka’s leadership poverty, its lack of men and women who had caught the grander view, who could rise above the compulsions of opportunistic politics and who could envision the good of the whole country as opposed to the advantage of this or that ethnic group or this or that party, has been fundamental.

The primary commitment of the vast majority of our politicians has been to their respective sectarian constituencies, whether Sinhala or Tamil, rather than to the nation as a whole, and given Sri Lanka’s demographic structure, whoever stokes majoritarian emotions will always exercise power over the whole country, whereas whoever puts the nation first is likely to pass into political oblivion!

Ironically, as a nation, Sri Lanka has never had a constituency or a leader. This paradox can be resolved only under two conditions. Firstly, the people’s consciousness has to be raised and widened to encompass the whole nation as its domain, but since that is likely to take several decades, or even a century, rather than years, there must simultaneously emerge one or more leaders who can rise above their narrow constituency perspectives and be able to catalyze the fragmented ethnic and religious groups into a unity.

Concerning leadership

Broadly, there are two types of political leaders.

The commonest are those who have sensed the dominant mood of the people, the zeit geist, and ride it to power, like surfers ride the waves. They are the sectarian populists. Not being rooted in a set of values, and lacking a higher vision, they do not question the morality of the dominant mood, much less seek to transform it, and once ensconced in office, using all the state apparatus at their disposal, seek only to magnify it. Lacking moral goals higher than attaining or remaining in power, they are quite willing to sacrifice the nation and the long term good of the very people who brought them to power, at the altar of their ambitions. As they hurry the nation in a disintegrating downward spiral, their sectarian constituency cheers them on, and lacking any criteria by which to judge themselves or their constituency, they cease to be true leaders of the nation and become instead tribal chieftains.

The second type of leader is those who, having caught a vision of a civilized society, try to objectify it. Their take off point is not the mass but the vision, and their constant reference frame are the attributes of that higher moral order, viz .fundamental rights, righteousness, equality, justice, integrity, fairness, harmony and peace. The dominant paradigm will always resist any attempt by that higher order to intrude upon its sectarian domain, but the test of a great leader is his willingness to dilute into it those elevated attributes, so that they may start working as catalysts, like salt works in a bowl of soup. Seeing that there is a huge gap between the higher vision he is trying to objectify and the sectarian consciousness in which he is trapped, the great leader tries to bridge the gap by upgrading the latter. He starts paddling upstream, against the torrent. Sadly, such leaders belong to a miniscule minority.

My experiences in Jaffna in the mid 1960s prompted me that Sri Lanka was light years away from attaining nationhood, and the events of the decades that followed have fully confirmed that conviction. As I said earlier on, Mrs Bandaranaike’s refusal to visit her people in Jaffna in December 1964 when they were in deep distress, was more than a personal dereliction. It was symptomatic of a deep underlying national disorder. It is not without significance that since Prime Minister Sir John Kotalawela visited Jaffna in 1955, not a single incumbent Prime Minister or President, with the exception of Mr. Dudley Senanayake (n the 1965-70 govt.) has visited Jaffna. (I am open to be corrected here) It looks as if for over 55 years the Head of the Sri Lankan state has renounced responsibility for one quarter of the country’s people! Is it a wonder then that those who are thus disowned and renounced seek to set themselves up separately and go their own way?

More than the power it derives from an overwhelming superiority in numbers, what exalts any majority community, and endows it with a true greatness and moral authority, is its willingness to accord to all those other communities who lack the advantage of numbers, a status and dignity equal to its own, and never to let them feel marginalized or disadvantaged because they are fewer in number, or because they are different in colour or beliefs.

Unless and until Sri Lanka can produce leaders who can realize that truth, and are willing to act on it, it will continue to be dismembered by conflict, long after the LTTE and Pirabhikaran have passed into history.

(Neville Jayaweera is a former Government Agent of Jaffna. The above article , extracted from his forthcoming book of memoirs, was published in the “Sunday Island” of Jan 18th 2009)

January 17, 2009

The Story Behind Lasantha Becoming Columnist "Suranimala"

by Vijitha Yapa

Many words have been written about Lasantha Wickrematunge over the last days, but words have failed me. Overcome with grief, I wonder whether Lasantha would still be alive today if we had not trained him to be an investigative journalist. That pang of conscience will haunt me forever. Memories flood back…sometimes in images, sometimes in incidents… his infectious laughter echoes and re-echoes in my head, as his shoulders shake coinciding with the bursts of laughter. Is he really dead? I stare at the posthumous editorial printed in the Sunday Leader. He must have had a premonition that he was going to die, but even in his wildest imagination he would not have believed that the four horsemen of apocalypse, four armed motorcyclists on their black horse powered machines, would be needed to carry out the death sentence. Who gave the order and why the order was given will perhaps remain an unsolved riddle like the Sphinx.

Even with Rs 7.5 million offered as a reward for the perpetrators of that arson attack on MTV, there are no takers. Who will have the conscience to tell us the truth? In the X Files series, the catch phrase was "The truth is out there". Perhaps, like an Agatha Christie crime novel, one day truth will be out.

Questions also remain for which we will never know the answers. If so many warned him about motorcyclists following him, why did he not take simple precautions or have at least another person go with him and at least make a complaint to the Police?

When they shot him, did they not realize that it is not red blood which would pour out of his body but blue ink. He was armed with a mere quill. They were armed with guns. What flowed from that pen was more powerful than all the guns combined. As long as there are investigative journalists, those quills will continue to be used. If the story is wrong, there are civilized ways of correcting them, without resorting to bullets against which there can be no retort, no correction, no errata, no editor's note.

When I was editor of The Island, Lasantha had been recognized as a potential journalist for our paper. But feelers sent out to him at the Sun newspaper where he worked evoked little response. Thus when a call came out of the blue asking if we could meet, there was an immediate response. Within a few hours, it was sealed. Lasantha accepted our offer.

Those days of on-the-job training paid dividends and soon Lasantha became an indispensable part of our team, which included Gamini Weerakoon, the deputy editor, Ajith Samaranayake, the features editor and D.B.S. Jeyaraj who came to us from Veerakesari, the Tamil language newspaper. Jeyaraj cut off his moustache before coming for the interview because Ajith had told him that I do not like people with moustaches!

Because of his close connections to the Bandaranaike family, the splits, the fights and the turmoil within the party was spilt out to the public. His innuendo type writing was first developed as a contributor to the gossip column, Anuradhapura Diaries, though he was not U No Hoo. It is in this column that Premadasa was referred to as Alaya, Mrs. Bandaranaike as Queen Bee, Anura was clown prince, Lalith Athulathmudali was Aluth mudalali while cabinet meetings were referred to as meetings in the almirah. When Vijaya and Chandrika, Actor boy and Satellite, had their first child, the name Vimukthi was first announced in that column, much to the surprise of even the couple and their relatives!

One story of Lasantha I remember well involved a former Sri Lanka diplomat, whose son was believed to have connections with the LTTE. Even the country he had served in was named. I wanted the story rechecked and a senior Cabinet minister confirmed he had heard the President's Secretary telling JR about it. But even with that, I reworded the story and said he was once an ambassador in an Asian country. But alas, the former diplomat sued and we ended up in courts where Romesh de Silva defended us and asked very pertinently why the letter of demand was sent on a government letterhead when it was a private plaint.

My next encounter with Lasantha was when I was Editor of The Sunday Times. He said there was a talented journalist named Raine who had just returned after a stint with the Hong Kong Standard. I employed her and it was months later I discovered that Raine was his girl friend.

In the late eighties, Lasantha asked if he can write a weekly column for the paper. After much discussion and his submission of a sample article, Lasantha was hired. Being Secretary to Sirima Bandaranaike helped him to cultivate friendships with many -- and the controversial Suranimala column was born.

He did not want anyone to know he was writing the column. We met during the week at a pre-arranged place to discuss the week's column. He brought the article to my home personally every Saturday and my wife Lalana decoded his hand writing and patiently typed it out. I then edited it, checked with him for any amplifications, clarifications and deletions when necessary and took it to the editorial office. Soon it became the most widely read political column in any newspaper in Sri Lanka, with its insight and surgical type rapier thrusts. He feared no one. The frequent visits led to a female boarder in my neighbour's house developing a crush on him, which ended when she was told politely that he had other interests.

The Premadasa era brought many things to a head. The President wanted Sirisena Cooray to help him form the Cabinet which Mr. Cooray declined by saying he did not want to be blamed for cutting other people’s necks and took off in a helicopter to Devinuwara to be with Mahinda Wijesekera at a function in the Devale. Mr. Cooray knew that President Premadasa wanted to cut the powers of Lalith and Gamini.

The publishing of this item infuriated Premadasa who felt we were trying to convey to the world that there was a rift between him and Mr. Cooray. The publisher and I were attacked from public platforms.

Lasantha as Suranimala wrote on current issues and gave inside details, including what was served for supper! In one instance, he wrote of President Premadasa's proposals on devolution which had been sent confidentially. But Lasantha had discovered that Premadasa used four different colours of ink to trace for leaks. He deliberately mentioned the colour of the ink used in the file copy which led to a major crisis in the Presidential Secretariat. K.H. J. Wijedasa, Secretary to the President, phoned me at home and wanted to know who the source of information was. I refused to divulge any information and he said it was a request from the President. I said I am unable to help.

Suranimala's column continued and featured inside details of the government hunt of the JVP cadres, and by then the powers had discovered who Suranimala was. Threats to his life made Lasantha leave the country after the Australian High Commissioner helped him to obtain visas for his family. But the powers were surprised that though Lasantha had left, the column Suranimala continued. Lalith Alahakoon (who was then my news editor at The Sunday Times and is now the editor of the Nation) and I put our heads together and the column appeared regularly. Lasantha's father, Harris, met President Premadasa which led to the return of Lasantha.

Changes in colours of governments did not mean press freedom was guaranteed. Three of the journalists who worked with The Sunday Times have had problems with the authorities. Richard de Zoysa, who wrote a column for us, was abducted from his home and later killed. Keith Noyhar, who was working at the YMCA library in Fort and persisted in joining The Sunday Times as a trainee had his problems at the Nation last year and was assaulted and left the country with his family. The third is J.S. Tissanayagam, who joined us fresh from university and is today in custody.

Lasantha's column was embarrassing to the Premadasa government. They applied pressure.

The independence of an editor was more vital than stopping columns and I bid goodbye to mainstream journalism in Sri Lanka.

These events may have played a part in Lasantha's decision to start his own newspaper.

He was fearless, took risks, irked many and paid with his life for his beliefs. He was threatened, beaten up, shot at, sued and his press set on fire and even sealed. But he was a one-man army. He was meticulous with his research on investigative stories and every thing was backed up with documentation, whether writing about ice cream parlours, misuse of credit cards or arms purchases.

Conversations were tape-recorded and reproduced on the front page of his newspapers, to the embarrassment of many. But in the process he had no friends and created plenty of enemies.

In my view, the danger of writing news stories or columns where one is the publisher and editor is that there is no one to read and check your story and raise any points or objections. Thus anything was fair go, which has its own implications. Sadly, in more recent times, he made the mistake of allowing his political views to colour some aspects of his writing. Yesterday's targets became today's allies, as happened with Chandrika Kumaratunga and Mangala Samaraweera. Some could do no wrong.

He sacrificed family life to return to Sri Lanka but never forgot to phone his three children.

Raine flew from Australia with the children and said amidst sobs, " We heard that once, the goons who had come to attack us turned away saying there was a lady in the car. Even the goons had their code, but the next time another group set on us with clubs and they hit me too. Why did they have to kill him? What were they frightened of?"

Last month, he married Sonali Samarasinghe, who had been by his side in the last years. A few days later, the assassins snuffed out his life forever. He wrote under many names but the phrase "Be that as it may" revealed who the author of the article was.

In summing up, he will remain an outstanding journalist, a dedicated professional in investigative reporting, a martyr who stood up for the freedom of the media.

He sought the truth. And what is the truth? A Fleet Street journalist, Peter Howard wrote, a powerful play in the sixties called "Mr. Brown comes down the hill". In it he asks, what will happen to Christ if he came back to earth today? He will be surrounded by people who have initiated a new morality where things are no longer black and white.

Church leaders believe he is dangerous and decide to eliminate him. Before he dies, they ask him the question Pontius Pilate asked from Jesus Christ over 2000 years ago. "What is truth?" Pontius Pilate asked and Christ remained silent. But Peter Howard answers that question through Mr. Brown. "Truth is the right you deny and the wrong you justify".

It’s a question we all need to ask ourselves honestly to save hundreds of Lasanthas in the future. That type of introspection may be the greatest gift we could give to Lasantha, so that corruption and misuse of power can be eliminated with a decisive lead by all, without merely crying for justice in a society which seems too deaf to hear.

(Founder Editor of The Island and The Sunday Times )

Germany – Sri Lanka diplomatic row due to Lasantha funeral

A diplomatic row has broken out between Germany and Sri Lanka after the funeral ceremony of slain “Sunday Leader” editor Lasantha Wickrematunge.

Both countries are at loggerheads with each other over some comments made by German envoy Jurgen Weerth at Lasantha’s funeral.

Sri Lanka's Ambassador to Germany, T.B. Maduwegedara, was summoned by the Foreign Office in Berlin on Friday, twenty four hours after his counterpart in Sri Lanka, Jurgen Weerth, was summoned to the Foreign Office in Colombo over his conduct at the funeral of slain Sunday Leader editor Lasantha Wickrematunge.

Ambassador Weerth had spoken at the funeral in his capacity as the dean of the Diplomatic Corp. in Sri Lanka, and had consulted other Colombo-based diplomats before he spoke. It is learnt that the German foreign office had asked Ambassador Maduwegedera what wrong Ambassador Weerth had committed at the funeral.

Foreign Secretary Palitha Kohona who expressed the government's displeasure at Ambassador Weerth's speech told the media that he had called for a report from Mr. Maduwegedara "on the matter", but declined to give further details.

Ambassador Weerth in his funeral oration said, "Today is a day when one remains speechless," adding "maybe we should have spoken before this. Today it is too late."

Namini Wijedasa writing in “Lakbima News” of January 18th has outlined the background to this diplomatic row. Here are some relevant excerpts:

The government last week chastised German Ambassador Jurgen Weerth over an apparently unrehearsed speech he made at the funeral of The Sunday Leader editor Lasantha Wickrematunge.

And questions are now being asked: Did the diplomat, in fact, exceed his mandate or was the government being typically xenophobic?

According to reports, Weerth’s under-three-minutes speech at Monday’s funeral went something like this: “Today is a day when one remains speechless. Maybe we should have spoken before this. Today it is too late. Today is a day when humanity has lost a major voice of truth. But he will live in his work.” Weerthen also called on the government to investigate the killing and to prosecute the offenders.

The remarks appear harmless. A journalist who attended the funeral said they were not controversial. “Ambassadors don’t usually get involved in the internal affairs of a country or make speeches against governments in host nations,” said one commentator, who wished to remain anonymous. “As far as I know, the German ambassador did not deliver a contentious statement.”

“Surely, everyone has the freedom of speech?” asked another observer, who also did not wish to be named. “As long as the ambassador didn’t criticise the government, there’s nothing wrong. From the point of view of the diplomats, they just attended a funeral at which the German ambassador delivered an oration. As simple as that! It’s not their fault if political parties had tried to capitalise on it.”

One website reported German Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Elmar Erich as saying the ambassador had not overstepped his bounds or made a political statement. “The chosen tone was adequate and it was an appropriate sign of solidarity,” he added.

Others say this was a reaction typical of the Rajapaksa government, which has shown itself to be against foreigners (in general) and against the West (in particular).

It is learnt that Weerthen had been selected to deliver the brief eulogy after the Western bloc met formally and agreed he was the most suitable person for the task. But local diplomats said

Weerthen should have known better. Secretary to Ministry of Foreign Affairs Palitha Kohona—who subsequently summoned the ambassador to express displeasure over the graveside tribute—said it had not been wrong for Weerthen to attend the funeral.

“What is wrong is that the funeral had been publicised as a political event,” Kohona explained. “For two days, a certain political party had made announcements asking people to come and express opposition to what was happening. That made the speech unacceptable.” Foreign ministry sources said Weerthen had been contrite.

“Funeral orations by foreign diplomats are totally unnecessary, particularly in situations like this when a prominent person has been murdered and it has become a political issue,” said senior retired diplomat, Nanda Godage. “These diplomats have confused licence and liberty. Would they take these liberties with India or with any other country? They do it because we are small and week. They must know their limits.”

He said that too many ambassadors posted in Sri Lanka to promote goodwill are “hell-bent on acting like politicians and getting publicity like politicians”.

Mangala to ask Barack and Hillary to investigate Gotabhaya

by A Special Correspondent

Moves are on to request US President elect Barack Obama and Secretary of state designate Hilary Clinton to investigate the conduct of a US citizen Gotabhaya Rajapakse in Sri Lanka.

Opposition political leader Mangala Samaraweera is behind moves to investigate the Sri Lankan defence secretary for alleged acts of state terrorism in Sri Lanka.

A detailed dossier outlining several instances of human rights violations by Government related or Govt controlled agents has been prepared for submission to the new dispensation in the United States of America (USA)

Most of the cases cited amount to deliberate, pre-planned acts of state terrorism.

Defence secretary and Presidential sibling Gotabhaya Rajapakse who is a US citizen has been named as being directly and indirectly responsible for many such incidents.

Leader of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party’s Mahajana Wing, Mangala Samaraweera says he has prepared a detailed report of human rights violations in Sri Lanka to be handed over to US President elect Barack Obama.

He said that he had requested US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to immediately investigate a US national who is behind the “international conspiracy to destroy Sri Lanka’s democracy.”

Samaraweera said that he will make arrangements to meet Clinton and will be flying to America soon for a meeting with the new secretary of state.

He said that an American citizen was behind the attack on the MTV/NBC building and also the killing of Sunday Leader editor Lasantha Wickrematunge.

He also said he was going to ask the US State Department to investigate this person since he had “betrayed the US by being involved in such acts.”

Samaraweera further added that he will be submitting a detailed report on this person along with evidence and will be closely watching the steps taken by Obama’s government with regard to this matter.

Gota instructs Police to arrest MTV News Chief Chevan Daniels

Moves are on to interrogate and then detain Mr. Chevan Daniels , the news director of MTV/MBC media network whose studio at Pannipitiya was attacked by a terror squad in civil garb two weeks ago.

Instructions have been given by defence secretary Gotabhaya Rajapakse to the Police that Daniels who is of Tamil descent should be interrogated and then detained on the grounds that he was a Tamil tigers.

This crude abuse of power follows the horrible attack on the MTV studio and subsequent cover – up by the Govt.

The pretext on which Daniels is to be arrested relates to the interview given by him to CNN after the Pannipitiya attack.

The CID has detailed a special team to track down and record a statement from MTV Channel One News Director Chevan Daniel, CID chief M.G.W.M. Muthubanda told The Sunday Times.However, he declined to give the reasons for CID detailing a team, but other police sources said that it was regarding an interview Mr. Daniel had given to the CNN regarding the January 6 attack on the MTV/MBC station.

The CID team visited the MTV complex at Depanama in Pannipitiya but was told that Mr. Daniel had not come in. Mr. Daniel drew ire from the defence establishment following the CNN interview which was telecast on Wednesday.

Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa in the interview telecast live on state TV and other channels later in the day drawing reference to the CNN interview said, “Half an hour before I came here I saw someone from Sirasa appearing on CNN saying that a claymore mine was used in the incident (on the MBC/MTV station) and that the government was responsible. He asked if the government could capture Kilinochchi why it couldn’t catch those responsible through investigations”.

He referred to that person as a 'kotiya' (Tiger) and said he would imprison him. He then went on to say that the burning down of MTV was an insurance ruse undertaken by the company itself.

Mr. Daniel in his CNN interview said it should be “noted that initial investigations revealed that a claymore mine may have been used to destroy our complex.”

“… As you said…, the Sri Lankan government is carrying out a fantastic military offensive against the rebel stronghold in the north and has captured Kilinochchi and Elephant Pass as well, and what really puzzles us is that why the government can’t put forward a similar effort to curb the type of lawlessness that is now rampant in the south, and in particular in Colombo,” the CNN report quoted Mr. Daniel as saying.

Opposition and UNP leader Ranil Wickremasinghe had publicly queried from the Govt whether it intended arresting Chevan Daniels to which no proper reply has been given.

Informed sourcs revealed that Chevan Daniels had hastily left the Country upon being tipped off that Gotabhaya had instructed Police to interrogate and detain him under the prevention of terrorism act (PTA).

Four Journalists including Iqbal Athas flee abroad after Lasantha killing

Four prominent journalists have fled Sri Lanka in the aftermath of “The Sunday Leader” editor Lasantha Wickrematunge’s brutal assassination in broad daylightby motor cycle gunmen in civilian clothes and helmets.

The journalists had allegedly received reliable tip – offs from within the defence ministry that they were on the hit list of the sinister forces behind Lasantha Wickrematunge’s killing and the attack on Sirasa/MTV studio.

After this sudden turn of events four journalists have left the country and gone overseas.

The four journalists are the political columnist of Lankadeepa newspaper Upul Joseph Fernando, Lankadeepa defence columnist, Rathnapala Gamage, Sunday Times defence columnist Iqbal Athas, and Anuruddha Lokuhappuarachchi, Reuters photojournalist.

Iqbal Athas who has been under constant threat had left Sri Lanka earlier and relocated his family abroad.

He had then returned to Colombo and resumed writing in a very restrained and careful manner

His situation report has not appeared in”Sunday Times” for two weeks in succession.

Meanwhile, MTV News Director Chevan Daniel has also left the Country some sources said.

Lasantha's killing places all of us in common dilemma

By Rajan Hoole

When faced with someone’s violent death, the question inevitably arises, why him or her and not me? It is a question we dare not try to answer. To do so is to seek false comfort. We have to face it with humility, as a duty and debt cast on us. One day perhaps we might understand. The divine economy has no place for personal vanity -something the killers of this world have in abundance.

The murder of Lasantha is not more criminal than that of thousands of ordinary folk gunned down by the killers of several governments of this land, by the LTTE and by the JVP. Rather, it presents the ugliness of the ruling clique in its sheer nakedness. Many Sinhalese who turned a blind eye to what was happening in the north-east as what needs to be done to fight terrorism, have seen the ugly monster that has fattened itself on their money, their feelings and their passive consent

LWBW0117.jpg

[Media right activists light candles front of the portrait of slain Sri Lankan newspaper editor Lasantha Wickramatunga during a silent vigil to condemn his killing in Colombo January 15, 2009.-pic: Buddhika Weerasinghe /Reuters-via Yahoo! News]

Lasantha in his damning posthumous testament makes it clear why he was killed - for his journalism articulating his commitment to a liberal democratic society, a plea to view the ethnic problem in the context of history and not through the telescope of terrorism. His paper also articulated a reality that is lost on most Sinhalese, that while the terrorism of the LTTE must be confronted, but ‘to do so by violating the rights of Tamil citizens, bombing and shooting them mercilessly, is not only wrong but shames the Sinhalese, whose claim to be custodians of the dhamma is forever called into question by this savagery, much of which is unknown to the public because of censorship.

A nation that has bombed a section of its own citizens for 20 years without ever implementing a decent political settlement opens itself to damning censure. Lasantha was not suicidal; he enjoyed life, his children and his journalism. He wrote his last testament after weighing his adversaries, and decided that it is nobler to face what confronted him full throttle, than to make conciliatory noises in the right places and lead a respectable, conformist existence from which all that ennobles man is fled. This is the corruption we, alas, invariably encounter among the great and the good of our society, and something that always tempts the best among us.

Like all of us, Lasantha no doubt had his failings and his moments of shame. These would be of interest to the biographer who sets out a balanced picture of the man and his struggles against his achievements, for the benefit of posterity. For us now, his death and the manner of it, redeem all his faults. He has thrown the gauntlet very effectively at the rulers of his land who have brought ridicule on sovereignty and the rule of law.

The president understood this. In his victory speech over the capture of Elephant Pass on 10th January, he referred to sinister international conspiracies to ‘belittle these victories, to turn the attention of the people to other directions’. He spoke of efforts to tarnish the image of the army commander with unfounded charges. To these conspiracies he added the murder of Joseph Pararajasingham MP at Christmas mass and the attack on Uthayan Newspapers on World Press Freedom Day. The president might have added that the international conspirators have prevented his police from making any headway with investigations.

All these when the president, as he said, was engaged in giving new life to the unitary status of our country through enlivening democracy. Previously in an IANS interview in September 2007, the president affirmed his position of a unitary state citing his political legacy and constraints. His legacy appears in the report of an SLFP parliamentary group meeting in the wake of the 1958 communal violence against Tamils, in Tarzie Vittachi’s Emergency ‘58, which was censored without the author being physically attacked: “The Tamils will destroy us eventually. Before that happens, I ask the Tamils be settled once and for all” (Pani Illangakoon). “The Tamils are gaining strength in all parts of the country where they are. The Sinhalese are in danger of being liquidated by them” (Sagara Palansuriya). “Destroy them” (Lakshman Rajapakse).

It is a terrible thing for the country and the president to carry the burden of this 60-year legacy, which has mired this country in violence without hope. Victories have been celebrated before over the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians and combatants. It is the glory of a moment, the opium for greater misery to come. It means attacks on civilians and the Press would increase because the truth is what the leaders dare not face.

What the president and government spokesmen have tried to diminish is Lasantha’s greatness in his conscious stand, knowing precisely the evil his honour bade him confront, even unto death. He has followed a proud tradition to which few have attained, but paid a terrible price that is a reflection on our times. Those who must live cheek by jowl with the forces of terror know exactly where the danger lies and whom it comes from and what these forces are about.

Two very legitimate items appearing in the Daily Mirror in April 2007, led to the president’s brother and Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, threatening the paper’s lady editor with some misfortune from the Karuna group and journalist Uditha Jayasinghe with a scarier prospect.

All journalists who valued their independence took the threat as dire a warning. One could see the slow erosion of standards, as papers tried to buy insurance by giving space to hacks who supported the government in an uncompromising military approach to the Tamil problem and whose forays into semantics were the counterpart of covering up crimes of the security forces through violence and intimidation. These highly accomplished persons who were taught in school to play fair on a level playing field may soon be bowling to wickets from which the batsmen have gone six feet under or were stopped at the pavillion.

Here is a quality missing from present reporting, which earned for Uditha Jayasinghe the defence secretary’s sinister rebuke when she tried to represent the plight of Tamil displaced in the piece titled, ‘Mutur IDPs: Battling a manmade tsunami in the guise of war’. She said, “Without even food in their bellies it is at best difficult to predict when these people will have a place to call home and if their lives will ever be rebuilt to include hope and happiness.” The attack on reporting on the plight of Tamil refugees did not stop there.

Journalist Tissainayagam was arrested and cast into a TID cell in March 2008 and is since detained. Justifying the incarceration, Rajiva Wijesinghe in a letter to a major human rights organisation cited the following from Tissainayagam’s writings about the siege of Vaharai as designed to embarrass the Sri Lankan government through false accusations: “Such offensives against the civilians are accompanied by attempts to starve the population by refusing them food as well as medicines and fuel, with the hope of driving out the people of Vaharai and depopulating it. As this story is being written, Vaharai is being subject to intense shelling and aerial bombardment.” The very idea of governance is thrown into ridicule when the attorney general is required to file charges against Tissainayagam on the basis of such. The country is so blinded that all this appears legitimate because the victim is Tamil.

Accurate or not, what Tissainayagam wrote was neither a crime nor an outlandish interpretation of current facts, as seen from the Non Violent Peace Force report for Batticaloa District during November 2006: “... according to figures collected by our teams, there were...between 149 and 177 civilian deaths, 85 combatant deaths, between 217 and 847 civilian injuries, and 68 combatant injuries due to violence...Violence continued to escalate with 21 days on which shelling took place, 21 incidents of aerial bombing and artillery fire.”

Lasantha put it much more strongly in his final testament, “We have also agitated against state terrorism in the so-called war against terror, and made no secret of our horror that Sri Lanka is the only country in the world routinely to bomb its own citizens. For these views we have been labelled traitors, and if this be treachery, we wear that label proudly.” In May 2008, Keith Noyahr, deputy editor of The Nation was abducted and brutally attacked. The Nation was cowed.

The Leader press situated in a high security zone too had been attacked in November 2007. The president ordered a full-scale inquiry. The paper reappeared four days later on a note of defiance, “We shall never surrender our rights to downright thuggery. The public knows whom we refer to. We will prevail and march on, unbowed and unafraid.” The Leader had evidently not sought insurance through tactical compromise.

Against this history, thinking people have a good idea where these influential, well equipped goon squads come from and ultimately under whose authority they operate. There will never be evidence or judicial hearings when the role of the police is principally to suppress evidence. Something recklessly ugly has mushroomed. In the murder of Raviraj MP, UTHR (J) Special Report No 29, also tabled in parliament, alleges that the killers from the Karuna group handled by state intelligence were housed in a Maligawatte temple by a JHU-associated monk, who deals directly with the president; and the EPDP were accessories.

As with Lasantha, proof will never see the light of day. But the people know and this knowledge will haunt the murderers. We, and the people, know that the LTTE murdered Rajani Thiranagama in 1989, but we have no proof. Well-heeled Tamils, who are the counterparts of Sinhalese spin-doctors, have gone to town about legal proof writing reams, but to no avail.

Part of the reason why we are here is the conformist nature of the elite even though we are too far down the line of disintegration to play our usual games. Most of the commissions appointed had some of the best persons in our society. They produced respectable reports, but carefully, spared those at the top, as has become the norm for commissions of inquiry. If the disappearance commissions of the 1990s had worked, several senior officers in the security forces would have gone on record as being responsible for some terrible crimes. The burden of impunity has been passed on to another generation.

Lasantha had already answered those who would cover up by hiding behind the thoroughly debased law enforcement machinery: “In the wake of my death I know you [Mr President] will make all the usual sanctimonious noises and call upon the police to hold a swift and thorough inquiry. But like all the inquiries you have ordered in the past, nothing will come of this one, too. For truth be told, we both know who will be behind my death, but dare not call his name. Not just my life, but yours too, depends on it.”

Several of us have been in our time close to those who defied killers for a principle without flinching and paid the price. Subathiran, a solid democrat killed by the LTTE in 2003 was one of them. We have swallowed the semantics of killers and their agents.

After the LTTE abducted and killed Jaffna University student Vijitharan in 1986, LTTE Jaffna leader Kittu, asked us repeatedly in the Senior Common Room, “Where is the proof?” The damning testimonies left behind by my colleague Rajani are well documented. We exposed the LTTE’s violations because it was as Tamil people our duty towards our community.

After her death when all was dark, our best hope was reform in the south paving the way to an opening in the north-east. We did then find the space to work in the south while being as critical of the government.

The killing of Lasantha firmly places us all in a common dilemma, when a government purporting to eradicate LTTE terrorism becomes instead, its clone. Rajani would not have been surprised. She was keenly aware of the fascist potential of both Sinhalese and Tamil nationalist ideologies.

(Rajan Hoole is the head of UTHR (J), University Teachers for Human Rights, an organization which has attacked both the LTTE and the Sri Lankan government for rights violations. )

Left front not for Left Bloc government with UNP

By Dr. Vickramabahu Karunaratne

The political atmosphere of France is pervaded with the idea of the “Left Bloc.” After a new period of Poincare-ism which represents the bourgeoisie’s attempt to serve up to the people a warmed over hash of the illusions of victory, a pacifist reaction may quite likely set in amongst broad circles of bourgeoisie society, ie, first and foremost among the petty bourgeoisie.

The hope for universal pacification, for agreement with Soviet Russia, obtaining raw materials and payments from her, on advantageous terms, cuts in the burden of militarism, and so on, in brief, the illusory programme of democratic pacifism - can become for a while the programme of a Left Bloc, superseding the National Bloc.

From the standpoint of the development of the revolution in France, such a change of regimes will be a step forward onlyprovided, the proletariat does not fall prey, to any extent, to the illusions of petty-bourgeois pacifism.

Reformist-dissidents are the agency of the Left Bloc within the working class. Their successes will be the greater when the working class as a whole is seized by the idea and practice of a united front against the bourgeoisie. Layers of workers, disoriented by the war and by the tardiness of the revolution, may venture to support the Left Bloc as a lesser evil, in the belief that they do not thereby risk anything at all, or because they see no other road at present.

One of the most reliable methods of counteracting inside the working class, the moods and ideas of the Left Bloc, ie, a bloc between the workers and a certain section of the bourgeoisie against another section of the bourgeoisie, is through promoting persistently and resolutely the idea of a bloc between all sections of the working class against the whole bourgeoisie.”

The above statement of Trotsky in 1922 on the French political situation has been used over and over again to criticise working arrangements with capitalist parties. Is the Left Front Nava Sama Samaja Party making a Left Bloc with the UNP against the nationalist front of Mahinda?

In the first place there is no electoral or parliamentary political alliance comprising the UNP and the Left Front. But it is true that the present Left Bloc with the UNP will enhance the electoral campaign of the UNP. But we are not in an electoral front for a Left Bloc government. We are not interested in such a front. In the meantime we are interested in developing the relationship among Left groups and trade union unity. Our election lists display that Left unity. It must be noted that Trotsky pointed out that a Left Bloc victory over the National Bloc was a “step forward provided the proletariat does not fall prey, to any extent, to the illusions of petty-bourgeois pacifism.” So even if the UNP gains in elections because of the present Left bloc, we have to go forward consolidating our unity at the base within the proletariat.

We have to campaign not only for trade union unity but also for a national delegates conference. It is to bring representatives of work places irrespective of political association to fight for economic benefits as well as for a peace settlement. Already there is a campaign that started with the demand for a Rs 5000 pay rise. This slogan may have to be revised with the present level of price increases. The campaign for the reduction of petrol prices as ordered by the Supreme Court judgment is important; it has been accepted by the Left Bloc. Ranil has pledged to go forward on this issue as well. UNP unions participated in the July 10, 2008 strike. The plantation sector still has a significant trade union base.

“The fact that complete ascendancy of professional intellectuals over the workers prevails in the party of the Dissidents runs nowhere counter to our diagnosis and prognosis. Because the passive and partially disillusioned, partially disoriented worker-masses are an ideal culture medium, especially in France, for political cliques composed of attorneys and journalists, reformist witch-doctors and parliamentary charlatans,” said Trotsky in the same statement. But today the media has taken a different role compared to journalists in Europe in 1922. They have opted to play the role of the radical students in the 1948 revolution and the 1968 French revolution. Well, at least I hope so!

January 16, 2009

Only voices of sanity are those who continue to cry out in pain

by Shanie

One of the salient features of the Buddha’s forty-five year ministry was a rational approach in his teachings and in his own search for truth. In his wandering mission, he once arrived in the Kingdom of Kosala where the learned Kalama people lived. The Kalamas sat at his feet and asked him, "Venerable Sir, many religious teachers come to our place from time to time and expound their respective doctrines in detail. All of them say that what they preach is the only truth and the others are wrong. Thus while glorifying themselves and their doctrines they find fault and despise others, Now, Sir, we are at a loss. How are we to know which of these teachers speak the truth and which speak falsely?"

"Yes, Kalamas," said the Buddha, "it is quite natural to doubt where doubting is proper. Now come, do not accept a thing merely because it has been handed down by tradition or from generation to generation or from hearsay. Do not accept a thing because of mere scriptural sanction, nor by mere logic or inference, nor by superficial knowledge, nor yet because of your fondness for some theory, nor because it seems to be suitable, nor again just out of respect for a certain religious teacher. But Kalamas, when you know for yourself that certain things are unprofitable, blameworthy, censured by the wise, and when performed or undertaken conduce to loss and suffering, then you should reject them.

Now what do you think, Kalamas, when greed arises within a person, does it arise to his profit or to his loss?"

"To his loss, Sir."

"Well, by becoming greedy or being overcome by greed and thereby losing balance of mind, does he not indulge in killing, commit theft, go after another’s wife, tell lies and not only that, mislead others into evil and immoral acts which lead to his own loss and misery for a long time?"

"Yes, he does, Sir."

"Likewise, when hatred or malice, delusion or ignorance or such other evil states arise, do they not make people lose control of their minds and thereby lead them to perform all kinds of evil and immoral acts which end in loss and suffering?"

And when the Kalamas answered in the affirmative as above, the Buddha continued, "It is precisely for this reason, Kalamas, that I told you not to accept a thing merely because it happens to be traditional, and so on, and that you should reject a thing when you know for yourself that a thing is harmful and will bring misery to yourself and to others. On the other hand, when a person is not greedy, nor malicious, nor deluded – that is to say, is liberal, kindly and wise – what do you think: will not these qualities be to his own profit and happiness?"

"They will, Sir."

"And in being liberal, kindly and wise will they not become self-controlled and refrain from the immoral acts of killing, and so forth? And will that not be for their own and also for others’ profit and happiness?"

The above is from Anguttara Nikaya 1.188 quoted by Bhikku Kasyap in ‘The Path of the Buddha’. This columnist has taken it from a publication ‘The Value of Dissent’ put out by the Civil Rights Movement in 1992. It is very apt for our time, when media stations and journalists are being brutally suppressed for daring to challenge the propaganda of those in power. It is too much to expect the chauvinistic and fascist forces who ‘advise’ the President to heed the words of the Buddha. But let us hope that the President himself and other senior members of the SLFP in the Government will denounce and openly oppose the terrorism that is being unleashed against dissentients and opposition parties. In doing so, they will be upholding the liberal and democratic vision of the founding fathers of the SLFP – leaders like Bandaranaike, Sri Nissanka, D A Rajapakse and Bernard Aluvihare.

Police Investigations into Killings

It is a disgrace that the forces behind the killers of prominent ‘opposition’ personalities like Lasantha Wickrematunge, Janaka Perera, Raviraj, Joseph Pararajasingham, Johnpulle, ‘Taraki’ Sivaram and Maheswaran still remain unidentified. It is a telling indictment on the professionalism of our Police Service today that they have to make the excuse of ‘lack of evidence’ to explain making little headway in the investigations into these political killings. It is also a disgrace that the only action taken by the Police to the destruction of the Depanama studios of MTV/MBC was to arrest a UNP Municipal Councillor on the basis of an alleged anonymous telephone call. If the Police were to arrest and remand someone purely on the basis of anonymous telephone calls, there will have to be thousands of such arrests. But no, it appears you have to be an opposition politician to be so arrested. Thus two activists of the JVP were arrested for exercising their legitimate right to put up posters protesting the attacks on the media. It is a shame that the once professional Service has been so politicised.

Police action or inaction must be understood in terms of the strategy of the apologists and fascist forces surrounding the President who sought to divert blame for the terrorist attacks elsewhere. They make asses of themselves with their sanctimoniousness. It is not known if they believe their own propaganda but certainly they cannot fool the now more mature public.

In their annual report for 2007 released last year, Amnesty International concluded that "enforced disappearances, unlawful killings, arbitrary arrests and torture continued to be a feature of the ongoing and escalating conflict between the Government of Sri Lanka and the LTTE….As hostilities intensified the space for dissent was increasingly restricted, and journalists, particularly those associated with the Tamil media, were attacked, abducted and killed. Despite compelling evidence, the authorities failed to effectively investigate or prosecute those responsible for unlawful killings." Sadly, these conclusions still remain valid, perhaps to an even greater extent.

National Conscience and Sanity

During the period of the second JVP insurgency around the end of the eighties, several thousands simply disappeared or were extra-legally killed. It must be stated that the insurgents themselves were also responsible for many disappearances and unlawful killings. The Asian Human Rights Commission published in 2004 the stories told by the families of about 30 of the disappeared. In introducing the stories, the report sated, "As the stories narrated here show, tears are choking these families even now. Tears are also running in the heart of every decent citizen who has had the misfortune of sharing the bitter knowledge of political mismanagement and law enforcement in the country…..

It is often stated that many of those who masterminded and carried out these inhuman acts are still holding prestigious posts. One officer reportedly tells his friends that he "misses the fun of not being able to kill someone at least now and then." The degenerated psychological condition that made these acts possible is still prevailing, despite claims that ‘things have changed’. Nothing has been done to exorcise this condition. No one has made any apologies. No confessions have been asked for, and none given. Tacitly, cynical laughter is what the political and legal establishment is able to offer the families of the disappeared and anyone else who cares to raise questions about them. Even the UN agencies, such as the UN Human Rights Committee and the Working Group on Disappearances, have not been spared such cynical treatment."

The report concludes, "The only voices of sanity today are those who continue to cry in pain. These families have done this for over a decade and will continue doing so for the rest of their lives. At some stage, will the national conscience … prove capable of responding to their pain? The answer to this question lies in whether or not the Sri Lankan people will prove capable of escaping from the Bokassan scheme in which they are trapped." (The reference is to the former ruler of the Central African Republic, who manipulated the constitution to become the self-proclaimed Emperor Bokassa. He was overthrown in 1979 and later tried and convicted of treason, murder and embezzlement while in power.)

[Column from "Notebook of a Nobody" in"The Island"]

“Those who killed Lasantha were cowardly Barbarians”

By Dayan Jayatilleka

“…The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity…
…And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?” - WB Yeats, ‘The Second Coming’

I have a particular problem with the murder of journalists, especially editors of newspapers. The Editor’s Guild and Publishers Society of Sri Lanka annually host an awards ceremony at which the final presentation of the evening, the pinnacle prize (distinguished by a different hue from the others), is for Journalist of the Year. That award is named after my father, Mervyn de Silva. It was not donated by me or any member of his family. It was instituted by the premier organizations of the profession to which he dedicated his life. Lasantha Wickrematunge was an Editor of a mainstream English language newspaper. He was thus a member of that tribe of which my father was a renowned elder.

Irin1114b.jpg

Mourners light candles near a portrait of Lasantha Wickrematunge, the slain editor of The Sunday Leader, outside a Colombo cemetery soon after he was buried-pic: Amantha Perera/IRIN

I do not know who killed him, but I must disclose that I do know something about his killers and those who ordered the killing. They were cowardly barbarians. They were cowards because they killed an unarmed man, and anyone who intentionally kills an unarmed man or woman is a coward. They were barbarians because they expressed their disagreement with what Lasantha wrote and did, not by opposing his ideas with the same weapons of words, but by butchering him. That conduct places one outside the borders of humanity and universal values of civilization.

There are those who may think that these are values that cannot be upheld in times of war, especially a war against terrorism. That is nonsense. One of the finest acts of humane, civilized conduct I am aware of was by one of the bravest, most daring soldiers we have amongst us, General Gamini Hettiaarachchi, iconic head of the Special Forces, highly respected by the US Green Beret trainers based at Fort Bragg, and mentor of generations of Sri Lankan Special Forces operators, including the legendary “long rangers”. His brother, a planter, was decapitated by the JVP, but when he apprehended JVP leader Rohana Wijeweera at gunpoint, he did not even deal the latter a blow, and ensured the safety of Wijeweera’s family.

Let’s say it straight out. Lasantha’s paper was, in stridency of tone, a tabloid masquerading as a broadsheet. More controversially, he and his paper were not merely soft on the LTTE but were arguably pro-LTTE. None of that justifies his murder. Lasantha did not kill anyone. He did not even carry a weapon. If his paper was objectionable, it should not have been read. Perhaps it should have been boycotted. If his writing was distorted as indeed it often was, it should have been subject to withering criticism in writing. If he had dubious connections and was engaging in political conspiracy he should have been exposed. If he was acting subversively he should have been taken into custody and prosecuted in accordance with our tough anti-terrorist laws. Nothing he said or did warranted his murder, nor can be used to justify it.

It is simply illogical to suspect that the President and the Secy. Defense were guilty of or responsible for Lasantha’s murder. A local writer on a website had likened the killing to that of Benigno Aquino and had made reference to Marcos, with the clear implication as to who was playing Marcos. This is plain stupid. Marcos was a highly unpopular President and Aquino was a well known politician returning from exile with a good chance of replacing him. Lasantha wasn’t running for office and the incumbent President is hugely popular. Lasantha posed no threat to him. As for exposes of financial turpitude, Lasantha’s English language and therefore limited circulation newspaper had little effect. Another writer had opined on how perfect the timing of the killing was, oblivious to the irony that the factor of timing works precisely against the hypothesis of high level governmental guilt. On the one hand, the wave of military successes and the prospect of electoral triumph rendered utterly needless any violent measures against domestic dissenters and critics while on the other hand, the murder could only dull the glow of the President’s success and work to his discredit.

I am not making some special excuse for President Rajapakse. At the time of Richard de Zoysa’s murder I knew that President Premadasa had nothing to do with it and was appalled by it – though I did come to know that he permitted (but did not initiate) the cover up by the state apparatus and powerful elements in the governing party, some of whom are now at the helm of that party. Though a critic, I never thought that President Kumaratunga had anything to do with the murders of Tamil youth strangled with plastic handcuffs, floating in the Diyawanna Oya girdling the Parliament or with the murder of Kumar Ponnambalam shortly after he criticized her and the Government on TV in the Sinhala language, or with the lethal grenade attack on the Shah Rukh Khan show or with the murder of columnist “Taraki” Sivaram. All of these took place on her watch, while she was Commander-in-Chief, and yet I do not think she was guilty or responsible in any direct sense, anymore than Prime Minister Dudley Senanayake was responsible for the fatal dive that Dodampe Mudalali took from the Fourth Floor of the CID building in the Fort while being questioned on an alleged plot against the UNP Government of the day.

What we must remember however, is that in all these cases – Dodampe mudalali, Richard, the Diyawanna victims, Kumar Ponnambalam, the grenade attack and Sivaram—no one was convicted. The trail ran cold or the traces were kicked over, the perpetrators got off. In each of these cases, somebody decided that the intended victim was a subversive or a traitor and deserved death, and then took it upon themselves to function as or deploy others as executioner. Others, either agreeing with the logic or feeling a far closer affinity to the killers than the victims, covered up and convinced still others to go along with the cover up, irrespective of the damage to the system and the health of the body politic. This is the logic of the Ku Klux Klan, of vigilantes, Death Squads. It is a fanatical, fundamentalist, totalitarian logic; a fascist logic. Who will be the next victim?

Almost as abhorrent ethically as the murder of Lasantha, is the justification of that atrocious crime. There are emails flying around including one that urges that it be “propagated worldwide”, especially to the media, by all Sri Lankan diplomats, which is how I got it, courtesy of a horrified friend. The most unobjectionable part of it is the point that Lasantha’s posthumous editorial was not by him at all but by colleagues, and written post facto. So what? I had assumed that as I read it – and that is a perfectly acceptable journalistic device and literary conceit. The editorialist/s had been deliberately ambiguous about it. The e-mailer then goes onto comment on the quality of the English language prose of Lasantha and Sonali Samarasinghe, a comment which might have had greater credibility if the emailed exegetical critique itself had not left a great deal to be desired in its command of the English language. Worst of all is the justification of the murder – a justification that mixes in the viciously and speculatively personal, the religious and the racial. What is ironic is that the author and distributors thought that every Sri Lankan diplomat would somehow find this garbage either convincing or helpful. What they do not realize is that however badly the LTTE is defeated on the battlefield, all that is necessary for the cause of Tamil Eelam to be recognized by the international community and carved out a la Kosovo by international intervention, is for free tickets to be given to and appointments made for a racist or “patriotic” vigilante organization to spout these views before legislatures throughout the world. Already the anti-conversion legislation which a small party wishes to bring forward in February, poses the danger that if passed, it will put us on a collision course with the Obama administration and the Democrat dominated Congress – the most popular and powerful administration and the most influential legislature on the planet.

Irin0114tca.jpg

Adesh and Avinash, the two sons of the slain editor of The Sunday Leader newspaper, pay their respects to their father-pic: Amantha Perera/IRIN

The killing of Lasantha is a blow against the image of Sri Lanka and provides a weapon for the pro-Tiger Tamil Diaspora as it tries its utmost to forestall our final victory. Their question is being raised with some credibility: if this is how ethnic Sinhalese editors of English language newspapers are treated in Colombo , how much worse will the Tamils be treated by the victorious Sinhalese?

Prabhakaran has done our country more damage than we realize. Thirty years of war has caused an atrophy of almost all institutions and the hypertrophy of some. He has also caused a degree of mirroring of the conduct of his instrument. But not all the evil within our society and system can be blamed on Prabhakaran. During the liberal UNP administration of Dudley Senanayake we spent one thousand days under Emergency rule. The political atmosphere was such that the JVP armed itself in the late ‘60s against what it feared was an imminent rightwing authoritarian takeover by the JR Jayewardene-Esmond Wickremesinghe wing of the UNP. Six years of the seven year rule of Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike were spent under Emergency, and “tyre pyres” appeared in April-May 1971, as did thousands of bodies of youths with the their hands tied behind their backs, floating down the rivers. Lt. Alfred Wijesooriya, convicted of the rape and murder of Premawathie Manamperi the Kataragama beauty queen, was the only one who didn’t get away. Governments change but organizations and structures, systems and sub-systems, apparatuses and machines, learn modes of behavior which then begin to inhere unless consciously inoculated or programmed against.

If there are those who think that people should be killed because of what they express and then go onto to actually order the killing; if our institutions cannot apprehend and punish the killers and therefore they enjoy impunity; if there are those who actually justify the murder of an unarmed man however bad or wrong his views; then something very nasty and dangerous is happening to us. What kind of society is emerging? What would we have lost while engaging in the necessary war against the separatist terrorist enemy?

I find the critical commentary on the murder of Lasantha to be unhelpful because, as in the case of Richard’s killing, the tendency is to make cheap political points by pointing the finger at the national leadership. Misdiagnosis helps no one: when there is a malignancy encysted in the entrails, it does no one good to shriek about a nonexistent tumor in the brain of the body politic.

The upper middle class of Colombo have isolated themselves by not supporting the war effort, and therefore allowing itself to be seen or portrayed as unpatriotic. The contrast with Mumbai could not be starker. While the young professionals in the corporate sector in Sri Lanka belong to the so-called peace lobby, in Mumbai they were out demonstrating against the government’s ineffectual response to the terrorist attacks. While they wanted a full-on response to terrorism they were careful not to sound even the slightest anti-Muslim note. Similarly the Muslims of Mumbai were quick to condemn the terrorist attacks. In Sri Lanka by contrast, the middle class professionals are either for Ranil’s CFA and Chandrika’s PTOMS or sympathize with the Sinhala-Buddhist racist pressure groups.

We must support our military which is defeating that enemy described by Barbara Crossette in The Nation of January 6th as “pioneers of the suicide bomber and the cyanide capsule, and the most totalitarian and lethal guerrilla organization in contemporary Asia .” Bear in mind that contemporary Asia includes the Taliban, Al Qaeda, Lashkar e Taiba, the NPA, MILF and Abu Sayyaf. Our military is defeating a force rather different from some ghetto youngsters shooting off home made rockets which cause double digit casualties over a number of years. The Sri Lankan armed forces are doing this without murdering hundreds of children, and without using white phosphorus in populated urban areas. A quarter of casualties inflicted by the Sri Lankan offensive are not children and women.

While we support our military and the military effort, Sri Lanka must not enthrone militarism. Unfortunately those who oppose militarism do not support the military and the military effort, while those who support the military and the military effort do not oppose militarism. Similarly, while Sri Lanka is understandably proud of its adherence to Theravada Buddhism, it must not countenance intolerant practices. The outcome of the defeat of the Tigers must be a restored democracy and an open society, devoid of the mistakes and inequities that constituted the causes of our conflict -- not a straitjacketed social order which suffocates diversity and its expression and enthrones the values of intolerance in the name of patriotism, the nation and “cultural correctness”. After the gun-smoke of war wafts away in the tropical wind, we must not look around and glimpse the outlines of a dominant social bloc which has as its ideology a theocratic militarism and regards the popularly elected civilian political leadership as a screen of some sort. Could it be that the murder of Lasantha is part of an effort to dictate the terms of the post war order, social political and ideological; an extra-constitutional attempt to unilaterally re-draw the lines of permissible dissent? Perhaps, as Yeats warned in The Second Coming, “the falcon cannot hear the falconer”.

The history of the twentieth century, from Europe to Latin America shows that not only should the elected political leadership NOT be the target of unfair criticism, but must be recognized as the only potential counterweight against the negative forces and trends in societies such as ours, especially when the democratic opposition suffers an organic crisis of leadership.

(These are the strictly personal views of the writer).

Biggest LTTE mistake which brought curses upon the Tamil community

By A. M. M. Naoshaad

Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem.

Since my entry into Parliament in April of 2008, I have always maintained that I am an opponent of war. I would like to start with what Henry Ford said in his writings, “My Life and Work.” It states, I quote:

“My opposition to war is not based upon pacifist or non-resistant principles. It may be that the present state of civilization is such that certain international questions cannot be discussed; it may be that they have to be fought out. But the fighting never settles the question. It only gets the participants around to a frame of mind where they will agree to discuss what they were fighting about.”

Since the advent of this problem in this country and the many wars that we have fought, we have finally always tried to settle down to discuss the ultimate solution to this problem. Now, we have in this House a classic example of how youth of the minority community emotionally got sucked into this war. We have Vinayagamoorthi Muralidaran alias Karuna who belonged to the generation which came of age with the Black July. His is not just the story of one man; it is symbolic of the tragedy of an entire generation compelled by circumstances beyond their control to make choices which enmeshed them, their community and the country, in a cycle of vicious and deadly errors. It was a generation which came of age witnessing the spectacle of innocent Tamil men, women and children being brutally murdered by rioters while a majority of Southern society watched in silence. But, we all know that there were quite a lot of Southern people who risked their lives to save thousands of more lives. It was the most courageous and idealistic among that generation who joined the militant movements only to have their dreams shattered or characters degenerated by an unforgiving reality.

In a few short years, they were either killing fellow Tamil militants or being killed by fellow Tamil militants, supposedly brothers in arms against a common oppressor. Some died, some left, others stayed and died or prospered. Karuna stayed and prospered. But, I must remind Vinayagamoorthi Muralidaran what Albert Camus said or Albert Cami as pronounced in French said, I quote:

“We all carry within us our places of exile, our crimes, our ravages. But the task is not to unleash them on the world; it is to fight them in ourselves and in others.”

Now, this is the plight of this community and the country. What we need to understand is that the situation today, the military victory in Kilinochchi and the push forward to the North and the eventual or inevitable defeat of the LTTE, looking at the numbers should teach all of us a lesson in that this event that we are witnessing today and some being forced to celebrate is of our making. This is not something that was born out of nothing. I have said this in the House before. That when a section of the population finds that it is being deceived at every turn, when every democratic option is denied to them, then they have to resort to what they think is fair.

Now, we have members of the Government constantly harping on the CFA. I was a vociferous critic of the CFA. In fact I did not belong to the UNP at that time, and I was one of the vociferous critics of the CFA. And, you must remember that the Muslim community of the East suffered the most under the CFA. Under the CFA the events of Trincomalee, the events of Valaichchenai all happened when Vinayagamoorthi Muralidaran was a part of the LTTE fighting machinery. He was commanding the East. We suffered the most but what we need to understand is that if not for the shrewd tactics of the then UNF Government and its leader, we would not be in this position today. You have to understand that. In fact, when I was the Assistant Secretary of the United National Party, I used to have long discussions with the Hon. Ranil Wickramasinghe, Leader of the Opposition with regard to how to approach this issue. He would always say that the only option left is to agree to a ceasefire at any cost and hold it as long as possible.

Now, if you look back, if not for the CFA, if that then Government had kept on fighting, Pillayan would not be the Chief Minister of the Eastern Province today. Vinayagamoorthi Muralidaran would not be a Member of Parliament. He would still be a part of the LTTE fighting machinery. It was the CFA, the resultant peace talks, the exposure to the outside world, the mechanizations of so many foreign bodies that eventually made Karuna Amman leave the LTTE and fight the very forces that he had helped to build. If not for the CFA the international safety net would not have been established and the abandoning of the LTTE by the international community would not have taken place.

In fact, it was the CFA, the very CFA that destroyed the Hon. Ranil Wickremasinghe’s chances of becoming the President of this country. He paid the price for that. If the LTTE did not fear him, he would have perhaps been His Excellency Ranil Wickremasinghe. It was the biggest mistake that the LTTE did that brought this curse upon the Tamil community. If the LTTE had sat down genuinely and worked towards a peaceful solution they would not be in this situation today. We would not have lost thousands of lives on both sides, thousands of young men and women maimed for life and we would not have been discussing what we are discussing today.

So, it is easy to heap the blame on one side when the other side comes to power. And, that is why I was reluctantly compelled to interrupt the Hon. Minister of Foreign Affairs when he spoke about the CFA. If not for the CFA, what we have achieved or what the State has achieved today would not be a reality because you can keep fighting a war. You do not need the Opposition to fight a war. All you need is dedicated, well directed armed forces to fight a war. And, I must commend the Government for the leadership it has given to the forces and what they have achieved. As proud Sri Lankans we have to give credit where it is due and I am reminded of the situation that His Excellency the President is in today . In a letter that Winston Churchill wrote to a friend in 1916 he said, I quote:

“I think a curse should rest on me - because I love this war. I know it’s smashing and shattering the lives of thousands every moment - and yet - I can’t help it - I enjoy every second of it.”

This is what Winston Churchill wrote to a friend in 1916. As I said before, you do not need the Opposition to fight a war and the Government is doing a good job of fighting the war. But, what are we fighting the war for? Is it just to gain territory? No. The ultimate objective of fighting this war is to bring about peace. To bring about peace what do you need? You need consensus.

Finally, you need consensus of this House and all those who sit here to bring about durable peace. So, how do you build consensus when you keep on blaming the other side for everything that has happened in the past? You cannot bring about consensus. You are basically dividing the country further. Anybody who speaks against the war is a traitor. Anybody who is associated with the UNP is a traitor. But, you must remember that 48 per cent of the people of this country voted for the UNP or for Hon. Ranil Wickremasinghe. So, how do you bring the leadership of these millions of people to reconcile to peace? How do you bring peace without a consensus?

Today Vinayagamoorthi Muralidaran is in this House. He fought with the LTTE. Now he is with the Government and when we sit down to talk peace, he will definitely have his say. The JVP basically brought victory to his Excellency the President. But, today a section of the JVP is opposed to him.

The reality is that all these forces will have to come together and sit down to decide as to how we are going to take this country forward. Today you are in power, tomorrow you can be in the Opposition. But, that does not mean that you should continue to antagonize each other and not work towards building a consensus. You fight the war. Nobody can stop this Government from fighting the war. You have caught the Tiger by the tail. You cannot let go; you have to finish it. But, finishing it militarily, you must remember, does not necessarily mean that you are not leaving room for young people of 1983 like Vinayagamoorthi Muralidaran who felt like what Albert Camus o said, I quote :

“rebellion cannot exist without the feeling that somewhere, in some way you are justified”

In 1983, he felt that somewhere, in some way he was justified in what he was doing. This is not going to prevent other Tamil youths thinking in the same way. So, we do not want to re-invent the wheel. We need to work towards a consensus now, a Sri Lankan consensus, not a Sinhala-Buddhist consensus or a Sinhala consensus.

It is a Sri Lankan consensus where everybody - every Sinhalese, every Tamil, every Muslim, every Burgher - in this country feels that he is a part of this solution and that he is a part of a new Sri Lanka.

But, this cannot be achieved in the way we are going, my Friends, not by people being forced to fire crackers, to gather around the roundabout to prevent the Opposition Leader coming to the House or trying to intimidate us. Anyway, I do not get intimidated. All I can get is killed. But you have to die some day. But we have to speak out as to the dangerous trend that we are setting with the events of these few days such as burning of the MTV studios. I have never appeared on MTV. I do not attend those talk shows. But, that is a necessary element of our society.

So, I as a representative of the Tamil-speaking people of the East, I humbly request every member of this House to forget their political differences and work towards a solution by consensus and not by blame.

(This is the text of a speech delivered by A.M.M Naoshad in Parliament. He is a UNP member of Parliament from Amparai district)

LTTE Chief appeals to diaspora while Tigers prepare for "Final Battle"

By D.B.S. Jeyaraj

The old saying “All roads lead to Rome” is one that had its roots in the period when the Ancient Roman empire was at its zenith.The new saying icurrently in vogue in Sri Lanka seems to be “All roads lead to Mullaitheevu”.

Several fighting elements of the Sri Lankan army have either moved in or are moving into the North – eastern district of Mullaitheevu. In a related move , particular formations of the armed forces are targeting Mullaitheevu town. [Click here to read the article in full ~ in Daily Mirror.lk]

January 15, 2009

Amnesty International writes to Indian Foreign secy urging protection for civilians in the Wanni, Sri Lanka

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
OPEN LETTER

AI Index: ASA 20/001/2009
Date: 14 January 2009

Open letter to Indian Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon urging protection for civilians in the Wanni, Sri Lanka

Mr. Shivshankar Menon
Secretary
Ministry for External Affairs
South Block, Raisina Hill,
New Delhi – 110011
India

Dear Mr. Menon

On the occasion of your upcoming visit to Sri Lanka, Amnesty International calls on you to raise, with your Sri Lankan counterparts, concerns about the safety of civilians trapped in the Wanni, as government forces close in on Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) bases in the north-eastern part of the island. We also ask that you discuss the general deterioration of human rights in the country, even in areas not directly affected by the conflict.

More than a quarter of a million people, mostly Tamils, face immense hardship and are running out of safe space in the face of intensified fighting between the two sides. This population of internally displaced persons (IDPs) is trapped between the approaching Sri Lankan security forces and the LTTE, which has imposed restrictions on their ability to leave and is using them as an involuntary pool of recruits and labourers. With the Sri Lankan government’s recent recapture of Killinochchi, hundreds of thousands of people have been compressed into a smaller area and are increasingly vulnerable. As the fighting encroaches on the trapped population, there are fears of a further mass exodus of civilians.

Lack of protection to civilians during fighting

Given the restrictions imposed by both sides on independent media and humanitarian aid workers, there is little independent verification of conditions in the conflict area. Available information suggests that over 300,000 people are experiencing tremendous insecurity and food shortages aggravated by the fact that many of these families have sold most of their possessions to cope with multiple displacements.

In November 2008, Amnesty International drew attention to acute food and shelter shortages facing this population (Amnesty International, Sri Lankan government must act now to protect 300,000 displaced, 19 November 2008). At the time, the organisation welcomed the food supplies that were sent by the Indian authorities. As humanitarian supplies, including those sent by the Indian government, have since dwindled, aid workers express fears that many of the displaced are vulnerable to potential public health problems and are receiving far less calories than the daily recommended allowance. Also, civilians injured in the fighting cannot be transported outside the Wanni for urgent treatment due to road closures by the security forces.

As hostilities have intensified, the LTTE have stepped up its recruitment, especially of younger people. LTTE continue to hinder people from moving to safer places by imposing a strict pass system. In some instances they have forced family members to stay behind to ensure the return of the rest of the family.

Despite assurances by the government of Sri Lanka that the situation is under control, there is evidence to suggest that the authorities lack the capacity to provide the required humanitarian relief to displaced people. Humanitarian access to the Wanni continues to be restricted. Only government-approved food convoys are allowed to enter the area since the authorities ordered the United Nations, and nearly all humanitarian agencies, to withdraw from the Wanni on 9 September 2008.

On 29 and 30 December 2008, an Inter-Agency support mission accompanied the World Food Program-led convoy in order to monitor implementation of United Nations (UN) funded programmes and conduct a needs assessment. The mission noted increased vulnerability of the civilian population due to several factors including: ongoing fighting, new and repeated displacements into an increasingly compressed area, flood damage and reduced capacity and material to address urgent shelter and sanitation needs.

Attacks on media

Away from the front lines, the general human rights situation in government-controlled areas has deteriorated (Amnesty International has previously criticized the LTTE for severely curtailing civil and political rights in areas under their control). Amnesty International is appalled at the increasing instances of attacks on the media, including the recent assassination of the editor of the Sunday Leader, Lasantha Wickramatunge in Colombo and attack on the privately owned Maharaja television/MTV studios in Colombo which was ransacked by a gang who used claymore bombs to damage property.

During your upcoming discussions with the Government of Sri Lanka, you should pay special attention to the severe difficulties facing the people of Sri Lanka. Amnesty International urges you:

To raise issue of the civilian protection and press for urgently needed humanitarian assistance to reach civilians who are trapped between the two sides. Pressure must also be put on the LTTE to allow free passage of displaced families from the Wanni with immediate effect.

To press for international monitors to assess the humanitarian needs of quarter of a million people trapped in the Wanni and to ensure proper distribution of food and other humanitarian assistance, particularly as the fighting pproaches the trapped civilian population.

To raise the issue of attacks on the media and press for impartial investigation into the same.

Thank you for your consideration for the above recommendations, and we look forward to your response at the earliest.

Sincerely,

Sam Zarifi
Program Director
Asia-Pacific Program

END/

Public Document

****************************************

For more information please call Amnesty International's press office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566 or email: press@amnesty.org

International Secretariat, Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW, UK www.amnesty.org

January 14, 2009

Lasantha, my Editor and Friend

by Dr Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu

Lasantha Wickrematunga was my editor and friend over the last one and a half decades. He was an intrepid fighter against corruption, partisan and plucky, mischievous always and Macchiavellian sometimes, he dared to dissent and to push to the hilt the media’s contribution to a vibrant functioning democracy in Sri Lanka. His murder leaves a huge void in the ranks of the defenders of democracy and human rights in this country. He was an example many admired, but which few have yet to emulate.

Lasantha was also one of a handful of people in the media who truly recognized and appreciated the inherent pluralism of Sri Lanka and the need to arrive at a new social contract, which would encompass the aspirations of all of the peoples of this country. He ensured that his newspaper would have space for minority opinion and concerns when most were wittingly or unwittingly caught up in the majoritarianism of the day. Not for him the orthodoxy of the times, with its stifling stereotypes and biases. His newspaper gave more space than any other to the plight of IDPs , to the carnage wrought by the war on combatant and civilian alike and to the need for a political and constitutional settlement of the ethnic conflict. His is the only paper that had the courage and conviction to publish an editorial exposing the hypocrisy and inhumanity of homophobia.

His killing is an egregious act of terrorism against democracy in our country. The greatest tribute to his life and work will be for his death to serve as the catalyst for a broad coalition against the terror and terrorists who threaten our freedom. This coalition must include the apathetic and unknowing and all those who read the Leader to salve their conscience and by doing so, avoid direct action. As Lasantha always believed and as his life and work have demonstrated, there is never a good or auspicious time to act to arrest the slide into darkness. Democracy requires constant vigilance; it requires us in our country to do something about this darkness, NOW. No one should abstain; no one should believe that this is a duty that can be delegated.

I will miss the Monday morning call reminding me about my column and the chats about the challenges facing our country, the chuckles about the “good” and the “great”, the whiff of scandal and the looming crises. But most of all, I will miss an intrepid fighter like no other, in the fight to protect and strengthen the values we shared and without which our country will be doomed.

Lasantha, knowing you, remembering you will always help me, in the words from Tennyson’s Ulysees - to seek to strive to find, and not to yield.

January 13, 2009

A Final Farewell: Family Gives Up Lasantha To God

By Dharisha Bastians

“I would have stayed up with you all night, had I known how to save a life…..” - The Fray, How To Save A Life

In the heat of the midday sun, unprecedented crowds, estimated at over 7000 people, gathered to mourn slain Sunday Leader Editor in Chief Lasantha Wickremetunge on January 12. For a capital city that slumbers through political and economic upheavals, save for occasionally complaining about them at cocktail parties, such a call of conscience was groundbreaking. Sporting black arm bands and flags, carrying posters and banners, Sri Lanka’s conscience-stricken marched from Kirimandala Mawatha Narahenpita to the Borella Cemetery, some of them chanting angry slogans and accusations, caught up in the moment; others somber, overcome by the tragic finality of it all.

Perhaps the most unique thing of all about the eclectic crowd that came together on Monday was the fact that the majority of them came of their own volition. They were not coerced by any group or individual or dumped by the bus load by a political party eager to get as much political mileage as possible out of this blatant, brutal attack on the free media. As activist Sunila Abeysekera was to note in her funeral address, some of those who came had never read a word Lasantha had written. Still they came, she said, because it was not possible to be passive bystanders in the face of such a repugnant act. My 58 year old aunt, a grandmother, took a three wheeler to Narahenpita to take her place among the protesting groups. “The time has come to stand up. I can’t just sit and wait anymore. It doesn’t even matter if we get shot in the process,” she tells me wearily, her face drawn from the heat and emotion of the day.

Martin Luther King Jr. once said “We will have to repent in this generation not merely for the hateful words and actions of the bad people, but for the appalling silence of the good people.”

This ‘call to arms’ if you will, of the ‘good’ people, has been some time in the making. The people have stood by while journalists became The Hunted, harassed, threatened, abducted and assaulted at every turn. The murder of Lasantha Wickrematunge was the last straw in the string of incidents that has left the public reeling from the impunity and injustice of it all.

And so, the 7000 marched. For four hours, along the scorching asphalt of Baseline Road, Lasantha was hoisted from shoulder to shoulder - the Old Bens, the Black Coats and those who loved him best. At the entrance to the cemetery, they smashed a hundred coconuts and cursed his killers. Black helium balloons littered sunset skies. Black was the colour of the day and that was apt, for the day was dark.

Yet somewhere between entering the cemetery and the performance of Lasantha’s last rites, genuine sorrow got lost in the noise. A string of political speeches, taking up the better part of two hours took something away from the mourners. What should have been quiet tributes and celebration of a life, became a dance for the cameras, with politicians ranging from UNP Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe to trade union leaders taking the stage to condemn Lasantha’s killing and make vague promises about avenging his death. The crowds shuffled their feet uncomfortably, people chatted quietly in groups seated on the periphery of graves and some walked away, allowing the politicians to make hay in the aftermath of tragedy and death.

Only Sri Lanka Muslim Congress Leader Rauff Hakeem uttered any words worthy of being called an ‘oration’ when he quoted Mark Twain: “In the real world, nothing happens at the right place at the right time. It is the job of journalists and historians to correct that.” Lasantha, he said, was constantly trying to correct history and to set apart victorious euphoria and the tragedies of reality in the way he practiced journalism.

Many skilled orators took the stage that day. And yet through it all, not a single speech captured the man; his ready smile, the passion for his cause, the pride and love with which he wore the mantle ‘father.’ In fact, the only words spoken on behalf of Lasantha’s family came from his brother Lal, in a voice wracked with emotion. It was well past twilight on Monday when the burial rites for Lasantha commenced. The mood turned quiet, reflective and resigned as mourners lit candles and accompanied the family to what is to be Lasantha’s final resting place. Quiet tears replaced harsh slogans then as we watched Lasantha’s family and dearest friends give him up to God.

It was well past twilight on Monday when the burial rites commenced. The mood turned quiet, reflective and resigned as mourners lit candles and accompanied the family to what is to be Lasantha’s final resting place. Quiet tears replaced harsh slogans thenas we watched his family and dearest friends give him up to God.

As the crowd began to leave, I wondered whether we would all still remember this tomorrow and the day after that. The death of Lasantha Wickrematunge may perhaps be a catalyst for many things. It might give us the courage to fight harder to win our rights, it might spur us on to speak out against the great injustices that plague our society. It might even TURN the page on this blood sodden history. But the true and manifest impact of Lasantha’s death will be laid to bear upon his three beautiful children, those three small souls, who kept sorrowful vigil by his gravesite that night, long after the crowds had moved on.

The people especially the Tamil people are with Lasantha

by T.Sabaratnam

This column joins the people of this country to salute Lasantha Wickrematunga the undaunted fighter for the establishment of a transparent, secular, liberal democratic Sri Lanka.

I was one of his admirers who repeatedly warned him of the danger he faced. “Saba! Don’t worry,” he laughed out loud every time I cautioned. “It’s better to die than be silent.” He had been finally silenced. I am sure he would have been thrilled to see that so many people were with him. They stood by him.

I was not his close associate. I am 26 years older than him and I struck to tame journalism, having served at Lake House for 41 years. But as political reporters we used to bump into each other at press conferences and social events. Being strict teetotallers, we gravitated to the same corner where we shared thoughts.

My first meeting with Lasantha was in 1981. He was then a cub reporter at the Sun, where he joined after his studies in England. His interest being politics, he was assigned to cover a press conference held by Rural Industrial Development Minister S. Thondaman, leader of the Ceylon Workers’ Congress. Lasantha was keen to get an exclusive interview with Thondaman and I helped him.

Thondaman was a good judge of men and matters. He took an instant liking for Lasantha. Thondaman saw in Lasantha a young journalist willing to look at the other side. He told me, “He looks different from other Sinhala journalists.”

When I was reading the ‘last editorial’ on Sunday in The Sunday Leader my eyes started tearing. In it he had spelt out his and his paper’s ‘angle.’ I quote that portion in full because that portrays Lasantha.

“Every newspaper has its angle, and we do not hide the fact that we have ours. Our commitment is to see Sri Lanka as a transparent, secular, liberal democracy. Think about those words, for they each has profound meaning.

“Transparent because government must be openly accountable to the people and never abuse their trust. Secular because in a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society such as ours, secularism offers the only common ground by which we might all be united. Liberal because we recognise that all human beings are created different, and we need to accept others for what they are and not what we would like them to be. And democratic... well, if you need me to explain why that is important, you’d best stop buying this paper.”

Lasantha was what he was because he believed in transparency, secularism, liberalism and democracy. That was his mission. He was totally committed to it.

Whenever we met, we talked about the ethnic problem. There were occasions when we talked as representatives of our races: I as a Tamil and he as a Sinhalese. We always agreed we must continue to be what we were born and that was what enriched our motherland.

Once he raised the eternal Sinhala fear and asked: Won’t the Sri Lankan Tamil join hands with Tamil Nadu Tamils and smother the Sinhala race?” I told him that that would never happen. And I told him that though both speak the same language and follow the same cultural norms, the Sri Lankan Tamils have evolved a separate identity and they will never permit it to be swamped by the Indian Tamils. “We are proud of our sub-nationalism, the Sri Lankan Tamil nationalism. We wish to be Tamils and Sri Lankans.”

He told me he had also discussed that matter with his colleague D.B.S. Jayaraj and he had also told him the same thing.

We discussed at length about Tamil grievances, especially during the year-long 1984 All Party Conference, which we covered together, and young Lasantha was by then a convinced supporter of the devolution process. That was the period when Velupillai Pirapaharan was one of the many Tamil youth leaders and was beginning to emerge the first among them.

Lasantha was one of the two Sinhala journalists – the other was Mervyn de Silva – who were disappointed when President J.R. Jayewardene scrapped the All Party Conference and returned to the military option. I remember young Lasantha commenting, after government spokesman Lalith Athulathmudali announced the cancellation of the political process: “We have missed a chance.”

In this context, please read what Lasantha, a mature journalist, wrote to be published in the event of his slaying:

“…we have consistently espoused the view that while separatist terrorism must be eradicated, it is more important to address the root causes of terrorism, and urged government to view Sri Lanka’s ethnic strife in the context of history and not through the telescope of terrorism.”

I was at Kataragama on Friday evening when the Sinhala people lighted crackers to celebrate the recapture of Elephant Pass. Tamils were embarrassed. Lasantha understood the long-term implications of military occupation. Now read his words:“What is more, a military occupation of the country’s north and east will require the Tamil people of those regions to live eternally as second-class citizens, deprived of all self respect. Do not imagine that you can placate them by showering “development” and “reconstruction” on them in the post-war era. The wounds of war will scar them forever, and you will also have an even more bitter and hateful Diaspora to contend with. A problem amenable to a political solution will thus become a festering wound that will yield strife for all eternity. If I seem angry and frustrated, it is only because most of my countrymen – and all of the government – cannot see this writing so plainly on the wall.”

Lasantha was warned repeatedly of the dangers of voicing such views. He had been offered official favours. He had been offered facilities to migrate to other countries. He refused to accept them and made use of his acid pen to reveal instances of fraud and misuse of power. And the most touching thing is that he prepared to face the inevitable… the slaughter.

For him: “But there is a calling that is yet above high office, fame, lucre and security. It is the call of conscience.”

Lasantha! the people,