Relevance of the Indian Political Model of governance to Sri Lanka
By Arjuna Hulugalle
From time to time one hears the call for introducing the Indian Political Model of governance. To get proportions correct and see the relevance of the Indian model to Sri Lanka , one has to look at India in the same way as one looks through an amateur telescope from the rear of the tube. The subject focused will naturally look tiny.
India ’s population and size is at least fifty times as large as Sri Lanka.
19 states of the Indian Union out of 28 states are larger in size population wise or area wise to Sri Lanka.
In fact, we can, at most, make comparisons on the lines of an Indian state, if we want to stretch our imagination and draw a comparison with India.
Let us have a look at how an Indian State works. The Indian States have elected State Assemblies, which govern the State. Powers are decentralized from the State Assemblies to the Districts, the Blocks (Municipalities) and the Panchayats. The State Assembly of an Indian State in this context will be equivalent to our Parliament.
However, the evolution of our system has been quite different and the chances of a similar structure here may be difficult to be accepted by many, especially some of the Tamil political establishment. This is so even after the defeat of the LTTE and many illusions laid to rest. The demands in the past have been for separation, merger of the Northern Province and the Eastern Province and for self determination. It will take a long time to change that mindset.
The TNA election manifesto confirms this state of mind. A Tamil friend dismissed the TNA manifesto as a ploy solely to canvass votes. After all it was the same TNA that supported General Fonseka at the Presidential election and they knew that the General had no intention of complying with any of the conditions of the TNA manifesto. Is it then indicative of a residual strain dating back to times which the country had hoped was past history, when one asked for something much more than one imagined one could get?
The story of Victor and the importance of being realistic
This reminds me of a story about a friend of mine called Victor and this story goes back many years. Victor was an exceptionally bright student and had qualified as the youngest graduate to pass out in the UK in his field. Victor had however, an intriguing mentality.
His brother in law visited him in his home one day to find Victor had advertised a cow. Potential buyers were in and out of Victor’s cattle shed without Victor being able to close the sale. The offers were around Rs 1750. but what Victor wanted was Rs 5,000. After watching this for sometime, the brother in law asked Victor as to why he was asking for such a ridiculous price. Victor’s answer was:
"You never know, some idiot may turn up and make that offer. I am waiting for that."
No idiot turned up and Victor was left with the cow.
Adjusting the sails and being realistic
Not only the TNA but all Sri Lankans have to be rational. Here, the words of the American writer, William Arthur Ward could help to get our bearings: "The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails."
Sri Lanka is, a multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-lingual country and being at the cross roads of West Asia and East Asia, and its proximity to India , it has a culture of rich diversity, which if properly managed is its greatest strength.
At a macro level, there are broad divisions vis a vis ethnicity and the religions. However, the actual diversity is even more complex. Within the ethnic groups, there are several sub-divisions. Among the Sinhala and Tamil communities caste can have a haunting presence though its importance is receding. Then there are the regional and economic differences. The urban - rural divide is still very pronounced and the colonial tradition to concentrate on the urban areas and the capital city continue. The Western Province , where Colombo is situated controls 50 per cent of the GDP of the country. This has led to tension and even today this is reflected at the elections.
The best example of our diversity is reflected in the Northern and Eastern Provinces , where for the first time, the people are able to exercise their franchise without fear, and 1814 candidates from a record number of parties are contesting for 34 seats. The Northern and Eastern Provinces are not a monolithic domain of a LTTE based entity as many were made to believe for years.
The task ahead
The question to be grappled with is how to work on a concept that would nurture diversity, yet administer it effectively so that the integrity of the State will not be endangered.
We also realized that all segments of society had to be assured of Justice and Equity and through this a common destiny in the entire country would be nurtured and managed to work for the common good. In other words, a Sri Lankan identity had to come about while accepting and recognizing the diversity within the Sri Lankan nation.
Several external Constitutional experts, even those from India have been "coerced" intellectually to conclude, that all Sri Lankan problems will be solved with a political solution redressing the grievances of the Tamil community in the Northern Province and Eastern Province of Sri Lanka. The point is that there has been an awful lot of pressure to think that way for less than rational reasons. In reality, Sri Lanka needs a solution to meet the aspirations and grievances of all Sri Lankans and be acceptable to all. In fact, as a Muslim intellectual put it, the rehabilitation particularly of the mind should not be restricted to the North and the Eastern Provinces . It should be island wide. All have suffered over the past decades.
Kick starting a change by turning to the Mahatma
Where are we to start? Like the advice that was given to Rajiv Gandhi in the context of initiating the legislation for the Panchayatiraj in India , we too should turn to Mahatma Gandhi. We need an indigenous solution. The Western models we have tried out since Independence have failed.
We know that change is always vehemently resisted and will take time to take root. Change has to start at the village because it is the primary unit and the vast majority of the country live in villages. If the village can be made self reliant and function properly it will give the momentum to a healthy change throughout the country. This process can be initiated immediately and in tandem to the discussions on the macro issues.
There are 14,400 villages in Sri Lanka . They are already administratively demarcated and referred to as Grama Sevaka Divisions. The population is generally less than 1500.
The structures for the governance in villages should be on interest sectors focused on development and the decisions taken based on knowledge and not restricted to political patronage and manipulations. Is this being realistic in a society which is highly politicized? It may need structures to be put in place where the political interference can be reduced or minimized because the village has to have substantial autonomy. The interest groups will maintain a democratic balance to keep the focus on the development work of the village. Over time a new culture will emerge.
Every village needs by statute a fixed sum from the Central Government. The suggested figure is Rs 5.000.000 for its development work. An investment of Rs 5,000,000 in a village will generate an additional Rs 10,000,000 because the businessmen and investors will then bring in that money to stimulate development.
Role of women
In this political construction, women will play an important role. Firstly, they will have at least a sector, which devotes its entire energy on matters connected with women. In practice, from the experiments of the Gramrajya that have been conducted, women are the most active participants in the process of rural democracy.
What is most important with the concept of developing the Gramarajya is that it can concentrate on giving local activity and employment which will keep women with their families away from migration within the country and overseas. This will make a very substantial contribution to the mental and physical health of a nation.
Functions assigned in the Indian example
We can surely take a leaf from the Indian Constitution. The 73rd Amendment to the Indian Constitution in 1991-1992 made rural democracy mandatory, creating a three tier grass root democracy at the village, block (Municipal) and district levels in the states. 29 subjects are managed by the elected representatives of the Panchayats. They are
1. Agriculture, including agricultural extension;
2. Land improvement, implementation of land reforms, land consolidation and soil conservation;
3. Minor irrigation, water management and watershed development;
4. Animal husbandry, dairying and poultry;
5. Fisheries;
6. Social forestry and farm forestry;
7. Minor forest produce.;
8. Small scale industries, including food processing industries;
9. Khadi, village and cottage industries;
10. Rural housing;
11. Drinking water;
12. Fuel and fodder;
13. Roads, culverts, bridges, ferries, waterways and other means of communica tion;
14. Rural electrification, including distribution of electricity;
15. Non-conventional energy sources;
16. Poverty alleviation programme;
17. Education, including primary and secondary schools;
18. Technical training and vocational education;
19. Adult and non-formal education;
20. Libraries;
21. Cultural activities;
22. Markets and fairs;
23. Health and sanitation, including hospitals, primary
health centres and dispensaries;
24. Family welfare;
25. Women and child development;
26. Social welfare, including welfare of the physically and men tally handicapped;
27. Welfare of the weaker sections, and in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes;
28. Public distribution system;
29. Maintenance of community assets.
Rural democracy
Giving rural democracy high priority and high exposure will make a big difference in the political landscape of Sri Lanka . Stable villages will result in overall stability in the country. No one will be marginalized in this construction because each village will be active with its own development.
The Indian model of the States does not stop at the village level. It deals with the Blocks (our equivalent of the Pradeshiya Sabhas) and the Districts with strong planning and administrative structures.
In our case the Districts could have much greater autonomous powers. This is a response to a historical imperative of the agitation and war which we have put to an end. An example for us here is the Swiss Cantonal construction. The Swiss Cantons are in fact smaller than our Districts but have substantial autonomy again because of historical reasons. This has led to stability and development within a Swiss identity. Though small they have an adequate critical mass for self reliance which our districts also have. Maybe the term District has to be changed to a term like "Territories" to make it more appealing as a Unit of decentralization and devolution in Sri Lanka.
Constitutional concessions are most often horse traded and inspired by mere expediency. One should avoid if one can. What is needed is an actual platform for genuine development to reach the people rather than appeasing the illusions and vanity of the elites. A meaningful evolution will also take time and constitution making has to be an evolution. The conceptualists of the Indian Panchayatiraj system envisaged that it will take 25 years for the system to come to fruition. That was stated when the 73rd Amendment to the Indian Constitution was enacted in 1991. It is only now that the strength of the system is emerging as a success story.
10 Comments
The model proposed by the writer is indeed workable if not for the corruption, political bandyism and nepotism that plagues our society. Also the presence of the executive, ministers and the evergrowing list of politicians and stooges ensures that nothing can be done at village level without their blessings and involvement. Gramasevekas, Justices of Peace are all political animals who are there to serve their masters and themselves, not the people.
India is not a country - its a continent by itself - with the largest number of diversity of any single country.
Historically this nation used to be several states with separate governance - which included the present day Pakistan and Bangla Desh. Being the second largest population in the world. these so called federal states are hugely populated as well - one could say, over populated! Their diversity includes not just different ethnic groups and culture, but different languages unique to each state. Even their ways practicing their faiths are different from one state to another.
Therefore, this "nation" called India had to have this unique system of federalism because of the diverse culture, ethnicity and language. This system suites India - nut certainly not a small nation like Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka, historically used to be one united nation.
It was only after several invasions and incursions by South Indian armies into Sri Lanka that there was some kind of different ethnic influence in this country. Several times in history certain parts of the country was also ruled by these South Indian invaders.
However, each time the Sri Lankan rulers at t hat time were successful in chasing away these invaders from the country - although there were several remnants of these people that stayed back. Several years later, we experienced the invaders from Europe - Portugese, Dutch and British - who made a mess of Sri Lanka just like they did every country in the world they colonized.
They "imported" slaves from South India and settled them in all parts of the country - including the North and the central area - to enslave them in various activities to suit these colonialists interests. The worst thing they could do was when they eventually granted the so-called independence to Sri Lanka was to divide and rule the country whereby they granted these minority population of South Indians more privileges than to the majority Sinhalese people who are indigenous to Sri Lanka.
This was the main cause of the current so-called "ethnic" problem Sri Lanka is facing - which eventually snow-balled into a terrorist conflict with the certain groups of tamils engaging in barbaric activities such as ethnic cleansing of the areas where they were a majority by killing and slaughtering the Sinhalese people who were living with them and chasing them away form these areas of the North and East.
To make a long story short, the successive government of Sri Lanka were unable to find a proper solution to this problem because the Tamil terrorists were making demands for a separate state in a merged Nothern and Eastern provinces which would have given them a control of two-thirds of the coastline of the country.
Unfortunately, the former colonialists and their friends of the West were supporting these terrorist elements because as long as there was conflict in the third world countries the western nations always profited - over the blood that flowed from the people of these former colonies.
Fortunately, Sri Lankan people elected a President in 2004 who came into power with the promise to wipe out this terrorism that plaqued the country for 27 years, once and for all. And wipe out he did which ended the murderous trail of the Tamil terrorists from the face of the world for good.
Any infringement from India will be disastrous for Sri Lanka because it was India who armed and trained these barbaric Tamil terrorists in the first place. So, Sri Lanka should ask these countries like India to stay out of its internal matters and let this Island nation solve its problems its own way.
Sri Lanka has its own political solutions to its problems and will ensure they are implemented in order to provide peace and prosperity to all its peopl irrespective of their ethnicity!
Never mind the models/modes of governance. What is urgently needed are;-
Rule of law according to the laws of the land.This will mean the right to life,freedom of expression,freedom to live in one's own home anywhere without being displaced by state personnel including the armed forces,freedom from arbitary arrest and detention,freedom to travel anywhere in the island and stay anywhere without having to explain why,freedom to pursue one's own livelihood without conditions being imposed by the armed forces and police,freedom to stand for & vote in elections without intimidation and thuggery,freedom to travel abroad without having to explain why at places of embarkation,freedom to transact business with the state in any or all of the three languages,freedom to educate children in any of the three languages,selection by merit only for employment in the private and public sectors,a judiciary which acknowledges and implements the principles in the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights of the United Nations, agreed to and accepted by the government,a Bribery Commission with adequate funds, its own investigating and prosecuting staff,immediate arrest of all except armed forces and police who posess arms,public declaration of assets of those aspiring for elective office,dismissal of all public servants found guilty of fraud, disbarment of those found guilty of criminal offences and fraud from standing for elections to any post in the administration or appintment to such posts,publishing of all presidential commissions' and auditor general's reports in the public domain and complete accountability of all public officers and legislaters.
Are these too much to ask for If,so,will the author explain why?
All these are accepeted,acknowledged and implemented in India and other nations practising democratic governance.
Why not, in sri lanka?
Hi,
Its laughing matter. So this is why the Srilanka wanted to grt the independence from Britain. So srilanka is ready to be part of a a colony of a develpoed country if economy and development is fulfilled?
Whom you are trying to cheat? as a sinhala chavunist trying to suppress minorities rights you talk and give illogical reasons. But that will not be true.
If you have just, courage and wisdom answer my questions.
Karikalan
very good solution (in your dreem)
Isn't that Mahavamsam state that Sinhalese people came to this island with Vijaya and his 400 friends???
Who is indigenous people of the Island?? Sinhalese????
Trying to say federalism is only suitable for Large nation like Canada, India and USA. Is bit foolish.
Switzerland a tiny , has the most advanced form of federalism.
Its plain obvious that you do not want the Tamil people the same freedom you enjoy, the dignity you have ?
if you ever want peace in you county let the Tamil have what they have always asked for and what rightfully theirs, thats self rule in north and east home land.
if not we have no choice but continue to support what ever form of fight against the state. Do not make the fatal mistake.
I agree with xsrilankan that we can become the switzerland or Austria of asia. can Mr.Hulugalla tell why those are not suitable for srilanka, now that he has brushed off the indian model?
Tamil people are not worried about federal set up because the Sinhalse never consider any legitimate solution to the Tamil question.Who is this man to preach Tamils. You wait and see the advise of the UN experts to Mr Banki Moon.
Leader Chelva pleaded to allow the Tamils to live with peace and dignity.But the the Sinhala leaders choosed to brutalise the Tamil people. The authore should read the consitution of Canada and try to understand how the nations live there with dignity and how they prosper themselves. Don't you know that SWRD Bandranayake propsed the federal system as the best model of governance for SL. Even Kandyans had demanded for federalism to restore their rights from the low country domination .( boru nawe atha) see R. B Herath Srilankan Ethinic crisis.pp39-40
As MR is in power for some years now Ranil and Chandrika may opt for federalism .However Tamils will accept only a Kosovo model settlement. You keep on writing on federalism for Sinhalese.
*******************************************************
We have debated and tried various solutions but I am afraid nothing will work in SL. The chauvinistic Sinhala state will never understand or accept the legitimate aspirations and the right to self determination of Eelam Tamils.
The only viable alternative is the annexation (or leasing as in the case of Hong Kong to UK) of Eelam to the Indian Union for 10 yrs and end of this period there should be a referendum in Eelam to find whether Eelamists preferred the union with India or SL. SL can use the lease money to develop the south as China did 100 yrs ago.
*******************************************************
This is a masterpiece of conceptual yet original solution to the political dimension for a future Sri Lankan state. The author has concentrated on the practical realities rather than pander to racial and ethnic stereotyping prevalent among some members of the two major races on the island. The stress is on the multi-cultural, multi-religious and multi-lingual aspects of Sri Lankan society.
This is an indigenous solution that is well worth implementing. To those who advocate an Indian state model of governance he has eloquently argued its irrelevance and the difficulties it eschews from a practical as well as a historical standpoint. Sri Lanka and India are two very separate entities and the pre-colonial and post colonial evolution of Sri Lanka and India are very different too. Even the social and cultural attitudes between these two nations are very different. Many of my Indian contemporaries are amazed at the differences when they visit and do business in Sri Lanka as they already come with the notion that Sri Lanka and India are similar.
What is strikingly alluring is that the author has utilised the rural system of governance that India has implemented and wedded it to the Grama-Sevaka system in Sri Lanka that is already successfully in existence. He not only builds on this base but progresses it the next two tiers and advocates a Swiss style canton system that gives limited autonomy with safeguards within the national framework. This is building democracy from the grass roots and is sustainable and will inculcate civic pride among the citizens as they will be part of the solution. I especially like the suggested change in nomenclature too from districts and provinces to territories or a Sri Lankan equivalent. Getting rid of these colonial metaphors will once and for all concentrate the energies on a renewed Sri Lanka for the progress of its entire inhabitants.