Click for News Update: tweetsTrove

transCurrents Home

Government restricts movement to Vanni by UN, NGO and INGO staff

by Namini Wijedasa

It is more than one year since the war ended but the government from the end of June 2010 has introduced new restrictions on movement to the Wanni by staff of UN agencies, NGOs and INGOs.

Why? While there is no official explanation — as is often the case now — it is speculated the government is worried that negative reports about the ground situation in the Wanni would reach the international community via these “agents”. It was pointed out that similar fears had once led to restrictions on entry to IDP camps.

Asked how the nature of their work has changed since June, local UN sources said the new restrictions had taken them by surprise. UN and other vehicles had suddenly been turned away by the army at Omanthai checkpoint saying they now needed defence ministry permission to enter the Wanni whereas earlier authorization from the Presidential Task Force (PTF) on Northern Development had sufficed.

“At the end of June, no vehicles and staff were getting through,” said an authoritative source in Vavuniya. Instructions had been sent to the security forces headquarters in Vavuniya that no NGO or UN vehicles should be allowed through to the Wanni without defence ministry permission. There had been no advance notice.

“This is one of the problems we face, the frustration of not being officially notified that the government is going to change the access requirement,” said a UN official, on condition of anonymity. Another said that activities in the Wanni reached a “standstill” as NGOs and UN agencies tried to figure out the new system.

“Some work has been going on with people who are based in the Wanni getting access and limited supplies have been going through,” he said. “But there have been no major deliveries since June and we don’t know why these restrictions were introduced”

Earlier, it was also possible to inform the security forces headquarters in Vavuniya and to arrange permission locally. As long as the projects had PTF approval, staff and vehicles could go through. Since the change, however, defence ministry authorization is required for each trip and staff member. Given the large number of trips and staff members involved, this would mean endless time-wasting at the ministry of defence for no explicit reason.

UN sources said there was now indication from the government that the restrictions would be eased “somewhat” from Monday. “We have been told that some UN staff will be permitted to enter the Wanni on the basis of 24-hour advance notification provided to the security force headquarters in Vavuniya but we don’t know how the system will work in practice,” said one of the UN officials earlier quoted. “We will test it only on Monday. Hopefully it will go back, more or less, to the old system.”

But authoritative sources said these changes have been approved only for some UN staff of some UN agencies and that this was not acceptable to the organization. “There are some issues with the list,” the official said. “We are hoping it will be all UN staff and that the procedure will be applicable to NGOs as well.”

Laxman Hulugalle, head of the NGO Secretariat, denied that there were new restrictions on movement of UN agencies and non-governmental agencies in the Wanni. He said the PTF had earlier forwarded their applications for approval to the defence ministry; the only difference now was that the organizations were required to do this themselves. He dismissed speculation that the government was worried about negative reports reaching the international community via UN agencies or NGOs.

Hulugalle also denied rumours that a re-registration of all NGOs was on the cards. “Some NGOs are registered, some are working without registration,” he said. “We are looking at all of them but nothing has been decided.” Meanwhile, the proposed new act to regulate NGOs is shelved for the moment, he claimed.

Meanwhile, a senior UN official said he did not think the access restrictions were related to the setting up of an advisory panel on accountability for war crimes by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. “I don’t think the panel helped the mood,” he guessed. “I think they just decided to put in another layer of control.”

“We have experience this before at the Omanthai and Medawachchiya checkpoints but that was in a conflict situation,” said one UN worker, on condition of anonymity. “This is a peacetime situation and the government needs us in there to help with some of the things that are their priorities like getting people back to their homes, just providing the very basics of what is needed.”

As for the spat between the government and the UN secretary-general over the expert panel, it is learnt that the UN agencies in Sri Lanka are “trying to keep the operational separated from the more diplomatic elements this has taken on”.

“We are concerned with regard to being able to carry out our ongoing activities,” said one UN source, also opting to remain unnamed. The conversation between the UNSG and the government is happening at a different level. “But its impact on our work is of great concern to us,” this source said. “We are back to business as usual but we will be diligent in terms of monitoring this and seeing how it impacts on how we are able to do regular work.” - courtesy: Lakbima News -

10 Comments

Why Government restricts movement to Vanni by UN, NGO and INGO staff ?

Get the money and spend on their need military, build Buddha temples along the roads in north and east
Not to let the UN, NGO and INGO staffs see the war crime sites or failure of their re settlement effort
Also not to let the Chinese labor (convicts) to see


Posted by: pasel | July 18, 2010 01:15 AM

UN personnel in SL had proved many times that they support LTTE without any shame ... There many many instances of that in past few decades .... BAN Moon is leading to portray SL in bad light to support LTTE's next revival ... SL should take every steps to take control of SL rather than giving into every Tom and Dick of UN or NGO's ... SL goverment should safeguard it's citizens first ... UN/NGO's and other LTTE supporters should have no say when it comes to safety of the nation ... Take any step to protect SL from this ugly mafia now leaded by BAN moon ...

Posted by: Nihal Hathurusinghe | July 18, 2010 04:17 AM

Is the govt adopting an anti-UN stance due to its opposition to the advisory panel appointed by UNSG? In which case it is acting in concert with people like Weerawansa in obstructing UN activities in the island. This places a number of UN humanitarian projects like UNDP, UNESCO in jeopardy. Ultimate losers will be the ordinary people.

Posted by: SriLankan | July 18, 2010 09:46 AM

Certainly every Governing body in a country should be vigilant and screen every individual & organization that comes into their territory to be thoroughly satisfied of their motives and ambitions in their participation. Why alarmed so? Be cool if you have no ulterior motives.

Posted by: Udugampola Mrs. | July 18, 2010 01:57 PM


If NGO's and UN is going to cut down the funds or servicers it is time to look after our own interest atleast now. For past years Since 1977 we got used to foreign loans and funds. Then we have to listen what has to be done!!!
Thank god we have a leader who's got a good back borne not to say yes to every thing.

Posted by: Nalin fox | July 18, 2010 07:26 PM

UN, NGO and INGO staff supported Ruthless,Racist LTTE before they were gone for gud. They supplied the technologie to build Subs and supplied Arms to terrorists.
They should not given free access to our country and we must monitor their each movement while these thugs are in our country.

Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2010 07:57 PM

All sri lankan who vote and support manida and co will face prbolem to all kind aids through NGO others will stop. mahinda and co have enough money why no one asked about all politician property deatils to public. then we can find we are money go when foreign aids that is the reason NGO never beleive the states.

Posted by: futaint | July 19, 2010 02:33 AM

"For past years Since 1977 we got used to foreign loans and funds. Then we have to listen what has to be done!!!
Thank god we have a leader who's got a good back borne not to say yes to every thing." Nalin Fox

How about loans you are now getting from China, India, IMF and World Bank. Haven't you followed the advice of the IMF before the presenting the last budget? Did you increase the prices of so many essential food items before the budget at the request of the IMF or no more loans? My dear friend beggars cannot be choosers. We are now with the begging bowl.

Posted by: Martin Thomas | July 19, 2010 11:40 AM

The army needs to back out of the Wanni now and hand over civil administration to civilians. Instead, the government continues to live in fear of terrorists lurking behind every bush when they have ample opportunity to engage everybody in a genuine effort to make life better for the civilians in the north and east. And a "better" life means a life with equal comforts, opportunities and livelihood as those in the rest of the country. Enough of this paranoia. If the government thinks they can do it alone with just the military, so be it. But for God's sake, get on with the job instead of constantly dithering about hidden or imaginary "enemies".

Posted by: Anonymous | July 19, 2010 12:03 PM

Martin,I think it is time we get rid of this begger mentality cos borrowing is not begging, what ever we borrow we have to repay with interest and they know that we can and will pay our debt if not nobody would lend us any money even without any conditions

Posted by: NAK | July 20, 2010 06:36 AM

Post a comment

(The comment may need to be approved by transcurrents.com. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting; generally approved/posted if they are not abusive of the topic as well as the author and/or another commenter.)

(Please write the comment in paragraphs if its long and allow space between paragraphs, for easier reading by others)

Recent Posts on TC